meganium45
Active Member
OK, since there is no answered ruling on this question as of yet, and in reading Jimmer's response to the original question, it was not clear, except that he would rewind the steps, I thought I would give perspective on how I am ruling this call, and have someone disagree with me. If Jimmer tells me I am preparing to do it wrong, or one of the powers that be disagree with me, then I will change my perspective.
Situation, my opponent calls "Bringdown" the Ralts with a Gardevoir Lvl X having 3 psychic energy attached.
Bringdown is the attack on Gardevoir LVL X that knocks out the pokemon with the least hit points remaining in play, excluding Gardevoir Lvl X.
My opponent points to my Ralts (60HP remaining) as he states this.
I point out to my opponent that he has a ralts with 3 damage counters on it, and that Pokemon is knocked out.
My opponent then says "whoa, that's not what I meant", and calls a judge over.
The correct ruling in my gym is that my opponent called an attack with Gardevoir..
He said "Bringdown" which was a legitimate attack that he had the energy for.
He then incorrectly targeted a Pokemon with the attack - "that Ralts" or "your Ralts"
He had a pokemon with less hit points, and therefore that pokemon is knocked out, I take a prize, and my turn begins.
This is NOT this situation where he calls an attack with insufficient energy, or being unable to attack (Disable). He called an attack that he had the energy, and the ability to do.
The attack is called "Bring Down" - he called it. That is the decision he made.
The whole idea of a "Junior Mistake" really does not come into play here. This is a "big boy" card, and the player should be aware of what it does.
My decision on this does not change if he said "Bring down the Absol" when his Ralts had less HP, the Ralts still falls.
My decision may change if he said - Bring Down, pointed to my active and said - 60 damage, no powers, if I had disabled his bring down attack. (he really, and obviously meant the other Garde attack, and could not use bring down)
Vince
Situation, my opponent calls "Bringdown" the Ralts with a Gardevoir Lvl X having 3 psychic energy attached.
Bringdown is the attack on Gardevoir LVL X that knocks out the pokemon with the least hit points remaining in play, excluding Gardevoir Lvl X.
My opponent points to my Ralts (60HP remaining) as he states this.
I point out to my opponent that he has a ralts with 3 damage counters on it, and that Pokemon is knocked out.
My opponent then says "whoa, that's not what I meant", and calls a judge over.
The correct ruling in my gym is that my opponent called an attack with Gardevoir..
He said "Bringdown" which was a legitimate attack that he had the energy for.
He then incorrectly targeted a Pokemon with the attack - "that Ralts" or "your Ralts"
He had a pokemon with less hit points, and therefore that pokemon is knocked out, I take a prize, and my turn begins.
This is NOT this situation where he calls an attack with insufficient energy, or being unable to attack (Disable). He called an attack that he had the energy, and the ability to do.
The attack is called "Bring Down" - he called it. That is the decision he made.
The whole idea of a "Junior Mistake" really does not come into play here. This is a "big boy" card, and the player should be aware of what it does.
My decision on this does not change if he said "Bring down the Absol" when his Ralts had less HP, the Ralts still falls.
My decision may change if he said - Bring Down, pointed to my active and said - 60 damage, no powers, if I had disabled his bring down attack. (he really, and obviously meant the other Garde attack, and could not use bring down)
Vince