Pokémon TCG: Sword and Shield—Brilliant Stars

Cards for Legends Awakened

Status
Not open for further replies.
Well, but a lot of these possible reprints were last printed 4-5 sets ago. The last rhypherior and magnezone lines were in DP for example. If they don't reprint some cards then the ones in this set that need reprints to complete the lines, those new cards will become next to useless (unless in a deck with Garch X) in the next next format (09-10) when, unless POP drastically changes their rotating out pattern, at least DP-SW will be rotated out (prolly GE too.) <-- (sorry if that's hard to follow)



If you go here it has proof that we'll get at least 5:

"More powerful new Pokémon LV.X than ever before!"
But there's no reason they won't print new ones in future sets that will be in the 09-10 format.
 
In the news article on the POP website it says that Legends Awakened will have 'over 140 cards.' I made a list of all the cards we didn't get yet (that should be in LA) along with other reprints that may be there for higher stages (like magnezone and rhypherior lv. x.) I'm guessing there are only gonna be 141-149 cards in the set (why would they say over 140 if there would be over 160?) so, what do all of you think is going to be left out? Here's the list:

1. Bellossom
2. Deoxys (Normal Form)
3. Dragonite
4. Dusknoir (PRO)
5. Frostlass
6. Giratina
7. Gliscor
8. Heatran
9. Kingdra
10. Lucario (PRO)
11. Luxray
12. Magnezone (PRO)
13. Mamoswine
14. Metagross
16. Politoed
17. Probopass
18. Rayquaza
19. Regigigas
21. Spiritomb
22. Vileplume
23. Yanmega
24. Armaldo
25. Azelf
26. Camerupt
27. Castform
28. Castform (Rainy)
29. Castform (Snow Cloud)
30. Castform (Sunny)
31. Cradily
32. Crawdaunt
33. Delcatty
34. Deoxys (Attack Form)
35. Deoxys (Defense Form)
36. Deoxys (Speed Form)
37. Ditto
38. Forretress
40. Groudon
41. Heatran (PRO)
42. Heatran
43. Jirachi
44. Kyogre
45. Lopunny
46. Luxray (PRO)
47. Mespirit
48. Mewtwo
49. Poliwrath
50. Probopass (PRO)
51. Regice
52. Regigigas
53. Regirock
54. Registeel
55. Shedenja
56. Starmie
57. Torkoal
58. Unown !
59. Uxie
60. Victreebell
61. Yanmega (PRO)
62. Anorith
63. Dragonair
64. Drifblim
66. Exeggutor
67. Gliscor
68. Gloom
69. Gloom
70. Grumpig
71. Houndoom
72. Lanturn
73. Lanturn
74. Ledian
75. Lucario
77. Marowak
78. Metang
79. Metang
80. Mightyena
81. Ninjask
82. Persian
83. Piloswine
84. Poliwhirl
86. Seadra
87. Swaloat
88. Swellow
89. Tauros
90. Tentacruel
91. Unown J
92. Unown R
93. Unown U
94. Unown V
95. Unown W
96. Unown Y
97. Unown ?
98. Weepinbell
99. Bellsprout
100. Beldum
101. Beldum
102. Buneary
103. Chinchou
104. Chinchou
105. Corphish
106. Cubone
107. Dratini
108. Drifloon
110. Exeggcute
111. Gligar
112. Gligar
113. Gulpin
114. Hitmonchan
115. Hitmonlee
116. Hitmontop
117. Horsea
118. Houndour
119. Ledyba
120. Lileep
121. Luxio
123. Meowth
124. Misdreavus
125. Nincada
126. Nosepass
127. Numel
128. Oddish
129. Oddish
130. Pineco
131. Poliwag
132. Poochyena
134. Riolu
135. Riolu (PRO)
136. Shinx
137. Skitty
139. Spoink
140. Staryu
141. Swinub
142. Taillow
143. Tentacool
144. Tyrogue
145. Yanma
146. Buck’s Training
147. Cynthia’s Plan
148. Stark Mountain
149. Snowpoint Temple
150. Technical Machine TS-1
151. Technical Machine TS-2
152. Bubble Coat
153. Claw Fossil
154. Double Full Heal (E08)
155. Energy Patch
156. Energy Switch (E08)
157. Poke-Radar
158. Pokedex Handt 910is (E08)
159. Root Fossil
160. Switch (E08)
161. Azelf Lv. X
162. Gliscor Lv. X
163. Heatran Lv. X (PRO)
164. Magnezone Lv. X
165. Mespirit Lv. X
166. Mewtwo Lv.X
167. Rhypherior Lv. X
168. Uxie Lv. X

Thats 10 cards cut already, all the reprints. Then theres the promos and the trainers they might decide to not add in (Switch, Pokedex, Energy Switch, Double Full Heal). Then we're suddenly in the 140's.
 
There will be 8 LvX's. Japan now seems to be putting 6-8 LvX's out per set. If we only keep bringing out four each time we'll never be caught up.
 
I don't see how you can get that its meaning more than four. It just means that there will be new Lv.Xes, which is giving us more(adding to the ones we've gotten in other sets). There could be more then 4 Lv.Xes in the next set. But I don't see how you get it from * More powerful new Pokémon LV.X than ever before!
 
Even if there are 8 lv.Xs in the set, I bet you that it will still be 1 lv.X per box.
 
Look at this way tho. Of the Level X's, only Azelf, Mespirit, Uxie, Magnezone and Rhyperior were in the regular set.
I'm betting we won't get Heatran. We'll get that one set later. Mewtwo and Gliscor are interesting, but I'm betting Tin on them.
 
"More powerful new Pokémon LV.X than ever before."

Okay, let's analyse this from a grammatical point of view. If a word means something else, then by definition the synonym can be transferred in to keep the meaning the same. So, if we're taking more to mean a synonym for 'additional' or 'further' we can substitute that in.

'Additional Lvl. Xs' would make sense. However, 'Additional Lvl. Xs than ever before' wouldn't. The 'than ever before' implies that something that was in place previously is going to be beaten. So we have to take the definition of 'more' to be quantitative within the set. Hence, 5+ Lvl. Xs.

Either that or the people who wrote the sentence have a poor understanding of grammar. Which I suppose is very possible.
 
I guess they'll keep that Dusknoir promo back and release it together with the Lv.X form in the following set.

And there won't be any reprints. Maybe it's just the Japanese DP5 without those promos.
 
I myself got told we are getting 6 Lv.X's this set, and don't forget about Raichu and Dusknoir Lv.X

My 2 cents worth, i could be wrong
 
They MUST put Dusknoir lv.X in. It's too cool to not be included.
It's not cool, it's broken.
And why should they add a Lv.X from a future if they already have 8 Lv.X to print?

what does the heartan lv x do
Body makes all of the opponent's coinflips for burn fail, and power attaches two fire energy to it that were just discarded by an attack (Magmortar Lv.X, Blaziken, Ape etc).
 
Even if there are 8 lv.Xs in the set, I bet you that it will still be 1 lv.X per box.

Prime, I have a serious question? Why are you so negative about new set releases all the time? You ALWAYS think of the absolute worst possibility and then say it like it is a fact.

Here is why your actually wrong, If you look at sets that have had 8 Ex's then you would know what is going to happen here. Most of the time if a set has 1-4 Ex's/Lv. X it is 1 per box. If it has 5-7 Ex's/Lv. X it is 2 per box. 8 is interesting because it was about 2-3 per box. 9 is 3 per box.

Now, I dont know why you wouldnt use past history for this but saying it as fact or "betting" (which I feel is the same) isnt the greatest way to say it.

Oh, and B_T, I agree with you that would be absolutely horrifying to try to get the Lv. X and I might be in the same boat with you possibly.

Drew
 
Betting isn't the same as stating as fact. In betting, you can lose if you are wrong. In stating as fact, you can't lose, because it's already true. And I've made the point before, because you've brought up the whole "me stating as fact" thing before (for some odd reason, you felt it important to bring up again), and that I usually always cover myself with words like imho, feel, think, etc, etc. I don't have any insider sources like some people might, so all my thoughts are exactly that, just thoughts, and I hope I make it quite clear of that.

Why am I negative? Give me two examples of me being negative with the new set. 1 lv.X per box. One. Now, give me a second. You won't find it. It might sound negative, but in reality and imho, it's somewhat rational and realistic. I can't remember sets off the top of my head, but I remember people have better luck with lv.Xs in sets that had less than 4 in them. I seem to remember people pulling 2 lv.Xs more often in earlier sets than they do now (almost never it seems). Why should this change? More lv.Xs in the set? Has it changed between MT and MD? Nope. I don't see why it would change now. We aren't even guaranteed 8 lv.Xs. We are guaranteed more than 4 thanks to the "more lv.Xs than ever before." 5 is more than 4.

I don't see how you can apply EX-set logic to lv.X set logic. They are two totally different kinds of cards. We had so many sets where we had over 4 EXs in the set (all of them, I think, had more than 4), and we have never had a set with over 4 lv.X in them (yet). So there is no pattern for you to jump upon to (hopefully) "prove" me wrong.

I don't know what your problem with me is. You seem to be trying to find reasons to call me out, because you don't seem to be quoting anyone else here that shares the same views with me. I would think you might have better stuff to do with your life than come up with excuses to put down a fellow player of the game.

=/ [DEL]'Mom[/DEL] Prime

Prime, I have a serious question? Why are you so negative about new set releases all the time? You ALWAYS think of the absolute worst possibility and then say it like it is a fact.

Here is why your actually wrong, If you look at sets that have had 8 Ex's then you would know what is going to happen here. Most of the time if a set has 1-4 Ex's/Lv. X it is 1 per box. If it has 5-7 Ex's/Lv. X it is 2 per box. 8 is interesting because it was about 2-3 per box. 9 is 3 per box.

Now, I dont know why you wouldnt use past history for this but saying it as fact or "betting" (which I feel is the same) isnt the greatest way to say it.
 
I've seen multiple people post saying tha some X's will be in a tin.
Impossible.
All tin cards are REPRINTS! So, they have to be in set before they get tinned.

TheDarkTwins, the ratio of an X might change by 4 packs less.
2-3 X in a box is not possible, since we don't get a foil(Rare Holo) every pack
like our friends in the east, now, do we?

Back to back posts merged. The following information has been added:

I don't understand why you have 168 cards. When POP usually says more than 140 cards, it's usually within 141-149 range.

In DP1, it said more than 120 cards, and we got 130!
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top