Pokémon TCG: Sword and Shield—Brilliant Stars

Espeon on a Yugioh card?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Leader of the BGGD said:
Well, its not that big of a deal...

First of all, Espion Is a Nekomata

their in Japanese folklore, which explains that its modeled after the Nekomata, Since it has the Same Forked tail.
Click to expand...
I don't see the resemblance between Eifie and a Nekomata. A Nekomata's tail usually forks near the base, not at the end. Given that Eifie is not monstrous looking and is a Sun Pokemon seems to further differentiate the two. Additionally, none of the Eevee line are feline anyway.
 
Serebii1997J said:
http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/Crystal_Beast_Ruby_Carbuncle See the difference in the 2 now?
Click to expand...

Whats even more, something I didn't notice on the original picture, this creature ALSO has a second set of ears below its first set, like Espeon has those things below its ears as well, sure maybe its a bit chubbier, but IMO, you made it look more like Espeon with that.....

Side note: No more comments about Uri Geller, thats very off topic.
 
Cause we don't play YGO... This is a Pokemon forum, you can't try and make people sound stupid for just noticing something that takes place in YGO.
That would be like me calling you dumb for not knowing something completely off topic and irrelevant.

And that first card looks just like Espeon. The second card still looked a lot like Espeon, but just a little less than the first. It's fatter and has some dumb jewel thing on it's tail.
 
I should design my own card game. Just get all the Pokemon and add two extra ears and claim it is "original". But don't worry. I will have hundreds of thousands of 11 year old fanboys backing me up on that fact.
 
I'm sorry, but that thing uncannily resembles an Espeon. You can't add 2 extra ears and say, "Nope... Not Espeon." It even has a jewel in the middle of it's head!!!

BUT!!!!!!!!!!!!


The copyright date on the card outdates the creation of Espeon (I Believe). So that means if anything, we TOOK Espeon from them!! But of course, that's only if I'm right about the copyright date.... Please God no.
 
the copyright data on the magestic dawn espeon will be in relation to when the card was printed
espeon as a pokemon would of been copyrighted when the pokemon where all confirmed for the gold/silver gameboy games
ruby carbuncle would of only been created in the last couple of years(unless ofcourse they have been sat on the design for like forever) i suspect the date on the yugioh card is for the entire copyright of the yugioh cards('96 in this case) and that covers everything printed regardless of when it was created however i'm not an expert on copyright law
 
Last edited:
DarkJake said:
That's not a defense, lol. That isn't the card in question =\ that's like saying if I ripped off a pikachu in one image, but then made it different in another image means I'm in home clear. Nope.
Click to expand...

lol
That IS the monster that is resembled on a card.
They had to make it smaller so it's harder to pinpoint the details.
BUT, that's the monster that's supposed to be depicted on the card.
 
CSOC-JP054_800.jpg


Is it just me, or is that Gary Oak?
 
It has some resemblence but is way too manly. Although, with the way he's struggling with playing his cards, I'm not sure how manly he could be.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top