Sandslash7
<a href="http://pokegym.net/forums/showpost.php?p=
third person scorri
Unvote
Vote: Sandslash7
Voting a person for "faking" a posting restriction appears to be an attempt at getting an easy bandwagon going to scorri since it would be easy to push scorri for "lying". This appears to scorri as if Sandslash7 is voting for her for an easy reason and not a valid one.
"Easy bandwagon." I laugh. Responding with an "Oh My Goodness You Suck" vote is not a healthy response to my pressure. My vote is for a valid reason.
Now, Pikamaster posting that all warnings are now private thoroughly destroys any way for your impediment to be confirmed in-game without your death. At this point I have to accept your impediment as truthful.
UNVOTE: SCORRI
...What? No, I was just saying, from experience as a mod, with this many players I would usually strongly consider having two mafia teams. I'll have to double check what I said earlier (if I can be bothered) but what I meant was, a single mafia is likely about 11-12 people, but we might have more mafia than that spread over two teams.
I was looking for data and reasons for why you would expect a moderator to split the anti-town faction into two factions at that number. It would be very easy to haphazardly say something like that to plant an idea into townie's minds, and come back to it later when you are on the block.
I'm interested in the concrete. I too think that that many scum (Diaz will probably push us to assume 15 wolves (33%), given his track record) is very viable and logical, especially given the data presented in the WMAT. However, I'm going to be wary of your experience, as this is the Gym, and not anywhere else that you may have played. The Gym is a bit different. Thus, I'm going to be wary of ideas that you try to plant without in-game evidence.
@Dragon Clyne
I said, nobody should target me at night and so it is upto you if you want to target me, that is all
And we have our first role-claim of the game, and we aren't even halfway through Day 1.
It is clear you are crumbing a retaliation role. The fact that you say "target" means that the role you are crumbing is not an on-death role like Napoleon's from XVI, but an on-target role, which is significantly more powerful. You are attempting to dissuade all roles from targeting you, thus you do not want to be Seered or Priested. And because you are dissuading roles that are beneficial for you to be targeted by, you are clearly crumbing a role that is VERY harmful (probably a retribution-kill role).
Which could easily be a front for a wolf making a gambit early to avoid being seered. Either way it is a courageous move.
I'm inclined to believe you, actually. The correct play when given a role such as that is to make its presence known as swiftly as possible. This does not mean you are by any means cleared. You could just as easily be an independent with a "survival" win condition (possibly even a Serial Killer), or any other alignment.