butter nut ninja
New Member
Based on point a) you are indirectly calling me a wolf if Vablakes is a wolf because I called you out for wrongly saying I defended him? You are saying that if I was town, I would not contest that you were displaying wrong information about my actions? But it goes past defending now, you go on to say that if I was town, I "backed" a wolf without good reason.
Point b certainly comes off funny. Assuming Vablakes is a wolf, you are telling me I either contested your false information because I was a wolf, or I "backed" a wolf without a good reason. Now this is interesting. You changed your whole point. It went from "defend" to "backed." Those are very, very different things. But yeah, I think I WILL quote my post.
Here's the link: http://pokegym.net/forums/showpost.php?p=2362265&postcount=215
to where I attack HD and his case against Valblake. Nowhere did I defend Valblake and I will tell you something vegitalian, twisting words like that, changing intensity like from "defend" to "backed." These are all very, very scummy tactics. Your entire post above is a sublte accusation of me without actually coming out and saying it.
Unvote: Vablake
Vote: vegitalian
Clearly I was not the only one who disagreed with your post:
To which you responded:
Wait what? You are of course saying it means something, you went the trouble of pointing it out, and are implying it will mean something later. Also what’s with this “you’re right you were defending his point (but more subtly his playstyle.) You have no proof of that either. You are doing exactly the opposite of what you just said:
Vablake may be doing some really fishy stuff, but what you just did really raised a red flag.
-You posted False information
-You didn’t bother to even cite or back up your own opinions, which you just contradicted in your next post
Because you didn't back up ANY of your points
-You further went on to accuse me of either being a wolf who doesn’t like that you said I was falsely defending Vablake or I am a dumb townie who backed a wolf without a good reason. Do you know for sure Vablake is a wolf? You sure seemed confident in that second statement.
Scrolling back up, I happen to see this:
This whole post is off. It’s one thing for him to make a point and say “I think it’s safe to assume the wolves can talk,” but that part at the end really gets me. It’s a loaded question and no matter how it would be awnsered it would put the person he was asking [PokemonFreak5] in the wrong. Not the mention it’s unnecessary and unprompted given the situation.
But then there’s this post as well:
What? Don’t post a lot? It helps the wolves? You make a point to say you’re new? Who cares? I don’t. You make a point to say that you agree with everyone, but won’t hop on the bandwagon. This post is entirely filler and fluff, adds nothing to the conversation, and is useless.
No, no something is going on with you vegitalian. You are indirectly trying to accuse people without just out and saying it, you are posting just enough to stay active, but most of your post contribute nothing, and you say “back-up your points” and post information on people (including some false one) without backing up any of it, claiming it is just “how you perceived it.”
Your move.
Why mount a huge defense against vegitalian over listing players that defend/attack another? I think it's helpful and might be useful to us later on. It's awfully scummy to defend yourself against something as silly as a list. There's not much of a reason to do that so early in the game.
VOTE: Absoltrainer