Not just people, Rahul himself said you taught him.
First and foremost Rahul was a cheater at Nationals 2013 before I even knew him. The allegation that I taught a CHEATER how to cheat is so juvenile. On top of that he's 16/17 years old. His credibility is already shattered. Rahul is an example of just another player hopping on a bandwagon filled with starting rumors.
This is the first statement I've seen from you denying you stole the laptop.
Your research about me or what you've read is poorly executed. I denied taking Mees's laptop long ago. The only thing I plead the fifth about was giving an explanation that could incriminate myself and others. Watching Mees and his friends walk scott free from all this when they were the ones who STOLE JONS BACKPACK the night before I don't regret that decision at all. I believe in karma and this is a perfect example.
Respectfully, why did you start this topic if you're not willing to explain your side?
I have statements from five of my opponents that claim to not once see me look under my deck. Kyle Morris a judge who accused me of looking under the bottom of my deck to his judging knowledge my action was only worth a warning not a DQ. He doesn't even know the penalty guidelines yet because he's a judge his word is valued more then mine, even in my innocence. An email was sent to the entire judging staff from a POKE PARENT wanting me banned from regionals the night before. The fact that a judge claimed to see me look under my deck and did not step in to give me the benefit of the doubt or say something like "don't lift your deck that high or could you please shuffle the opposite direction because you could see your cards" just implies they were setting me up. I was treated unfairly and I couldn't even plead my case. It was non-negiotable. Someone earlier in this thread even posted that a judge stepped in to tell him to shuffle in the other direction because he could see his cards but I don't get that sort of treatment. Im treated unfairly and i'm discriminated against. I explained my side of the story you need to re-read my thread buddy.
I suppose it's to illustrate that TPCi was out to get you, or persuade people to believe you. So people can make up their own minds, these are the claims you make in your post above:
- Mees is lying
- There is no video evidence of you rifling through his suitcase
- The reported eyewitness must be lying
- Two Judges (Kyle and Bob) lied about what they saw at Philly Regionals
1-3 that you listed is all irrelevant subjects. Those three things shouldn't determine a judges actions against me. Just because someone said something doesn't make it true.