SomethingElse
Active Member
As the other posts in Ask The Masters, you are allowed to search your deck, like let's say Holon Mentor, and search for "up to 3", 1 to 3, only allowing 0 if you're opponent can not "find" a basic"
If you're opponent were to farmer the previous turn 3 basics in, and mentor the next turn saying there's 0 basics in the deck, is that common knowledge? Should a judge be allowed to confirm this by looking in the deck and acknowledging that none are in there? Or is a player allowed to lie in front of an opponent when it can be blatantly obvious when there are basics in the deck?
If you're opponent were to farmer the previous turn 3 basics in, and mentor the next turn saying there's 0 basics in the deck, is that common knowledge? Should a judge be allowed to confirm this by looking in the deck and acknowledging that none are in there? Or is a player allowed to lie in front of an opponent when it can be blatantly obvious when there are basics in the deck?