Search results

Hahahaha xD As long as you're not pushy about it, it's all good. Edit: I remember getting a Pokemon Professor logo right before I quit <.< I phail.

Good suggestion, thanks. I live a tad farther to it than I did 3 years ago, but seems like a good idea to start. Now to spend my entire savings on new cards <.<

...are there many of these guys still playing? Kinda why I quit in the first place, the game was overrun by seriousness 4-5 years ago ;_;

I have over 10,000 basic energies stored up. I think it's time to donate all but about 100 of each...

I see a few combos that could be used. Raikou + Electivire, anyone?

Nope, I'm dead serious. All I see with the fandom now are uptight jerks who like starting crap because they think they're so 1337 their feces don't stink and they want everyone to suffer that loses to them or that don't even play the way they do. Pokémon. SERIOUS BUSINESS.

The spirit of the game died log ago. All that's left is people that're trying to win at all costs, and not even caring what they're even playing as long as they can use it to get thast ever-so-important prize at the cost of their humanity...

Of course it makes sense. Pikachu always attaches itself to other Pokemon:tongue:

Those Pokémon look... delicious. Half yellow rat/half fruit is a great idea:rolleyes:

I haven't been to a league in months... this is the first I've heard of them. Pics?

Beckett treated Pokemon as if it was just another fad, hence their article structures and why they actually ditched Pokemon. Very unrespectable from something like that.

That's pretty much it. Where do you think the archetypes came from though? Most weren't born archetypes, a leader type built a rogue deck, pwned with it, and it cought on and became popular. The followers can't do that, they need to go directly archetype because they don't have to go through...

I in no way said that rogues don't need strategy AT ALL, but you have to admit more people would win with them than most rogue decks. And what I said also don't imply that leaders aren't too great to play archetypes. Don't force that competitiveness on me. I already said I'm a casual player...

IMO... Rogues are for leaders; Archetypes are for followers ...meaning usually archetypes are nobrainer decks that anyone with the herd mentality and half a brain can play, whereas rogue decks need to have the most strategic of players to not only play correctly, but to be created properly as...

I'll sign it.

It comes out exactly on my fiance's brother's birthday. Heh...

I nominate myself as best emo casual player.

VERY off-topic, but... How do you actually say that? Like a question? I've never heard of that phrase, and it sounds pretty gramatically wrong. And on-topic: New Blaziken art > Old Blaziken art:thumb:

Well Absol, I don't want to argue, debate, or fight with you or anyone, so I'll try to make this simple. You're misunderstanding me in lots of areas, that's all. I think it's best if you just forget everything I said anyway, because I come in a thread(in any board) with one intention and get...

Not wise. Too many people misunderstand my threads, and even my posts, such as the earlier ones in this thread. I'm not too great at wording my opinions and thoughts. So no, it's not much of a good idea...