Search results

Right. And the team who has only scored one offensive TD in their last nine games didn't score an TD's vs. the Ravens. Secondly this whole "the defense is a year older" argument has been repeated ad nauseam for years now. When will people realize that it isn't true? Terrell Suggs is 26, Haloti...

You completely missed the point. The Ravens have been the best defensive team in the NFL since 2000. They have a history of excelling on defense. Why should they have to "prove" that they're good defensively? And even in the San Diego game, the Ravens still won and they didn't give up a TD in...

Apparently you didn't notice the :wink:. New England does NOT have a prolific offense yet. They should've lost to Buffalo. They had a prolific offense the last time Brady was healthy. He is not playing like he was in 2007. Tennessee has been been bad lately. They started 10-0, then went 3-4...

But but but... Denver has only allowed 16 points! They have the best defense in the NFL! :wink:

For all intents and purposes a vaccine is a natural remedy. Also, what a load of garbage that article is. First of all, there is not such thing as a "live" or "dead" virus. Viruses aren't ever alive, so how could they possibly be dead? And only 500 people dying from swine flu? That number is...

One game vs. Houston means that the Jets have a great defense? Back to back posts merged. The following information has been added: So the Cleveland move was done correctly. None of the original Baltimore Colts wanted anything to do with the team once they left Baltimore. The fact that Indy...

Why don't you look up what things there are to do in those cities? "things to do is such a subjective thing anyway,population isn't. Dallas has a zoo and an aquarium. St. Louis has a zoo. If Nationals where in a city like Baltimore, you can take a 45 minute, $5 train ride to D.C. and see two...

But then our decomposing bodies would flood the waters with massive amounts of nutrients, which would it turn, cause algal blooms, which would then kill off all plant and fish life, etc. etc.

Why would the population be smaller? Why wouldn't there be need for a toilet? Where do you think people will go? No showers? Wait, I think I just answered my own question. The population will be smaller because everyone is going to die of bacteria poisoning. Good to know.

I think that might be brussels sprouts. They do leave a nasty aftertaste.

Do you really think the world grows enough vegetable matter to feed the entire population? Sure production could be increased after the meat ban, but what happens in the interim? Please tell me, what part of a huge cylindrical tower is simple? And as for the water cycle, You don't think...

Ah, It seems that you haven't read up on the whole Congress thing yet. Or about presidential elections. Come back to me after you've read about those things.

Why is it a bad idea? How many buildings would have to be destroyed to build your new ones? Where would the money come from? How many people would be put out of work when you ban meat? How many people would starve due to the meat ban? Have you read about the water cycle yet? Apparently not. Need...

After reading this post I've come to two conclusions: A) You're just thinking up the most outlandish ideas possible. B) You really believe this. If so, I recommend looking at the Constitution. I also suggest you read a little about Congress. And after you've finished with that, maybe you could...

Intelligent doesn't necessarily mean smart. Apparently you missed that entire "self aware" part. Besides, the fact that we can argue about whether or not we are intelligent proves we are. "Cogito, ergo sum"

You can't have an accent over the e, but you can have silhouettes of pokemon?

And isn't it amazing how the clouds match up perfectly?

True, but there weren't any fast food places within walking distance of the convention center. So the hours of operation of non-existent restaurants is hardly an issue. I'm still surprised there wasn't any sort of place in the actual convention center selling food. That tiny little cafe doesn't...

Ok. The part about major corporations hiring people to scout out things like food and stuff that was confusing. My point was there was absolutely no excuse for the food issue this year. If that is what you meant, then yes, we are in agreement.

It doesn't reinforce your point. Driving for more than a day is rarely cost effective. Plus it means that people have to take at least two extra days off of work. And there where two parts to the post. You still completely ignored the first part.