This recently happened in one of our major tournaments. The match is a 1 hour game and best 2 out of 3. During the 3rd round time has been called normally a tie would have been handed out to them given. However one of the players asked the judge if they can finish the game (determine a winner instead of a tie) the judge agreed (they have both 3 prizes by the end of last 3 turns). My question is, is allowing the game to continue (assuming both players agreed) a legal or acceptable?
In my honest opinion i believe that it shouldnt have not been allowed and a tie should have been given right away irregardless if both players agree. Need help/comments/opinions
In my honest opinion i believe that it shouldnt have not been allowed and a tie should have been given right away irregardless if both players agree. Need help/comments/opinions