Poisonous Roses (E-on)

[SwampertEX]

Pokemon: 21
4 Treeko (Dragons)
2 Grovyle (Dragons)
4 Sceptile (Holo)
4 Roselia
3 Grimer (Dragons)
3 Muk ex
1 Dunsparce

Trainers: 19
4 Oracle
3 POR
3 Switch
3 Oran Berry
3 PETM
3 Candy
1 LPS
1 Town Volunteers

Energy: 18
18 Grass Energy

This deck seems like it could work. What do ya think???
-Swampert

 

[nikePK]

I think you need more draw power. Drop a switch and a grass for a Warp energy, then add another Oran berry for more heal. Its not bad, it seems like it can matchup with most decks nicely. Against gardy, you haev its weakness. Against Blaziken, you have Muk.

Definitely play Wurmple over Dunsparce though. Maybe bump it to 2 also and drop something, i dunno. 9 basics isn't bad... if your running Net Search of Fanclub, none of which you are running.

You just need to add a lot more draw power. 4 Oracle and 3 Oak's research won't cut it imo. Get some Birch or Cat in there.... I dunno what you'd drop though. Also, you should be fine with being able to drop a Sceptile.

Gl with it.

 

[SwampertEX]

Umm, I have 12 Basics...

 

[nikePK]

oops, i can't count, rofl.

Nm, but change Sparce to wurmple fo' sho and try and find some room for more draw power.

 

[Kyogre]

It looks good, let me try and change it a little.

Pokemon: 21
4 Treeko (Dragons)
2 Grovyle (Dragons)
4 Sceptile (Holo)
3 Roselia
3 Grimer (Dragons)
3 Muk ex
2 Dunsparce

Trainers: 19
4 Oak's Research
3 Birch
3 Switch
3 Oran Berry
3 PETM
3 Candy
1 LPS
1 Town Volunteers

Energy: 18
18 Grass Energy (or maybe 14 Grass and 4 Boost?)

Not many changes, but it suits my play style better. And why do you want to use Wurmple over Sparce. Wurmple doesn't have the switch feature that Sparce does.