Pokémon TCG: Sword and Shield—Brilliant Stars

pyscic deck

Status
Not open for further replies.

lugia

New Member
It is a pyscic/fighting beat down deck in unlimited format.

pokemon(26)
3 Abra(base set)
2 kadabra (base set)
2 alakazam (base set)
3 natu (neo discovery)
2 xatu (neo discovery)
1 mr. mime (edition 2)
2 mewtwo (promo from the first movie)
2 machop (the e expantion??? its a 50 hp card num 117 if that helps)
1 machop (legendary collection)
2 machoke(base set)
2 machamp (base set)
2 swinub (neo destiney)
1 piloswine (neo destiney)
1 hitmonchan (base set)

Traners(14)
3 bill
3 potion
1 superpotion
2 berry
1 energy search
1 pokemon center
1 gust of wind
1 prof. oak
1 switch

energys (20)
1 rainbow energy
10 pyscic energy
9 fighting energy

the main attackers are xatu and machamp alakazam is used to keep them free of damage counters with his pokemon power.
 
WAY too many Pokemon. Choose one Stage 2 at most (or just a Stage 1 line), use a Stage 1 of the other type as support, and add 2-4 Babies/Basics. Also, your Energy count is a mite high. Your Trainer engine also needs major work. Here's one idea of a decklist.

Pokemon (14):
3 Natu (Skyridge)
2 Xatu (Discovery)
3 Swinub (Destiny)
2 Piloswine (Destiny)
2 Cleffa (Genesis)
2 Tyrogue (Discovery)

Trainers (30):
3 Bill
3 Oracle
3 Professor Oak
3 Computer Search
2 Item Finder
2 Town Volunteers
2 Focus Band
3 Gold Berry
2 Gust of Wind
3 Switch
2 Energy Removal
2 Super Energy Removal

Energy (16):
5 Psychic Energy
5 Fighting Energy
3 Rainbow Energy
3 Double Colorless Energy

This version uses Xatu and Piloswine to attack. Note that I changed the Natus to Skyridge. This is because of Removal Beam -- it's an attack and an Energy Removal rolled into one. Piloswine should be your main attacker, though -- High Speed Charge does a lot of damage. Be careful, though -- this deck has higher Energy costs than most Unlimited decks, so it might have some speed issues. I wanted to make sure this deck used cards from your original, though. Good luck!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top