http://www.pokegym.net/forums/showthread.php?t=61991 Hold it, that can't possibly be the case. Mothim specifically states it "Evolves from Burmy". Just plain Burmy. If Burmy Plant Cloak was considered its name, it can't evolve into Mothim since Mothim evolves from "Burmy", not "Burmy Plant Cloak" or anything along those lines, unless Mothim stated all three Burmy variations and not just "Burmy". And there's also the case of the font of the cardname in the top left. Stuff like "Trash Cloak" and "West Sea" are not the same font as the rest of the Pokémon's names. Simply put, it reads "Burmy Sandy Cloak", not "Burmy Sandy Cloak". It's not the same as in the case of the Unowns, where the name is of the same font size as the rest. Furthermore, it was ruled here that Pokédex HANDY910is is to be treated as if its name was Pokédex. HANDY910is is in the same font size as "East Sea", yet the former was judged not to be part of the name and the latter was. I'm convinced that the actual names of the cards in question are "Burmy", "Wormadam", "Shellos", and "Gastrodon", and that prints that say that stuff such as "Burmy Sand Cloak" being its name are errors, and as such, you can't have 4 Plant Cloak and 4 Sandy Cloak Burmy in your deck.