Pokémon TCG: Sword and Shield—Brilliant Stars

Speculative BW: Dark Explorers Set List

Status
Not open for further replies.
T&T have it listed at 46, but there's no picture yet.

Regardless, I've been visiting Bulbapedia for TCG stuff for a couple of years now and Nate always has been good about not updating things like titles of card pages such as "Espeon (Dark Explorers 46)" unless they're for certain.
 
Frost said:
Espeon being 46 means that they're going to cut two of the Lightning cards... boo. And they'll have to move something up either from the Dragon sets or as an English exclusive to close the gap between Espeon and Groudon. Which makes sense I guess because this set is pretty light on Psychic cards.
Click to expand...
Wouldn't it be funny if Siliglyph got bumped up a set?
 
I hope they don't put Sigilyph in there, as it messes up Darkrai Donk and CMT. Hopefully it stays in its own set so we can have one more format with these two being strong. (CMT isn't as bad, as it can tech in some regular Tornadus, but Darkrai Donk will have a sad face).

The death sentence Gothitelle line, however, would be a nice addition to this set.
 
Maverick Nate said:
What's wrong with Bulbanews? I'm the one who wrote that story, and I can confirm that everything in that story is corrcet, numbers included. I received a personal e-mail that had all of those things. If you have a problem with bulbanews, then say what it is so that it can be fixed.
Click to expand...

I think he's referring to there not being a source. You know, you want credit, so give the source credit. Basically, he doesn't want to credit the non-creditor.
 
immewnity said:
I think he's referring to there not being a source. You know, you want credit, so give the source credit. Basically, he doesn't want to credit the non-creditor.
Click to expand...

No, I got it from a personal e-mail where there wouldn't be a source. Don't assume things based on what you do (or, at least did for a while)
 
Maverick Nate said:
No, I got it from a personal e-mail where there wouldn't be a source. Don't assume things based on what you do (or, at least did for a while)
Click to expand...

You mean what I still do? That is, report on TCG news with sourcing where it was received? If it was from an email, say so. If the source wanted to remain anonymous, write so in the article. If they don't, write whom sent it. I believe you about the info, I'm just reinforcing the Bulbanews Code of Conduct: "Stories must include credible sources. These are to be presented as links at the end of the article under the headline Information. ". Emphasis is Argy's.

Anyways, back to the topic at hand, it could be an alternate art reprint. I mean, it is possible for us to get a card prior to even the Japanese reveal, as happened with many cards in Emerging Powers. I think a fully English exclusive card is nearly out of the question, though, as that is a very rare occurrence.
 
Groudon EX's official card number is 54/108 and Kyogre EX's official card number is 26. My proof is all herehttp://www.pokemon.com/us/pokemon-trading-card-game/bw_series/bw5/featured/.
 
Seriously hope we don't get 3 Eevee...Honestly the card annoyed me enough being in every pack of UD, not this set to...
(Though the Eeveeloution reprint is a good indication UD is on the way out)
 
I doubt we're getting all three eevees considering one of them is alternate art. We could be getting another :metal: or :normal: pokemon to fill the void.
 
I've always predicted two Eevee and one Volcarona card because we never get alternate artwork reprints in the same set as the original card. They're all either usually promos -- i.e., BW40 Volcarona as perfect example -- or less occasionally dumped into later sets like Call of Legends or Emerging Powers.
 
Haha... I thought that had solved the mystery of how many Eevee will be in the set, but I forgot that they put cross-generation evolutions together.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top