Tyranitar Lv.X

Discussion in 'Create-A-Card' started by rayquaza2222, Mar 21, 2011.

8 league13 468 60
  1. rayquaza2222

    rayquaza2222 New Member

    What do you think?
     
    Last edited: Mar 25, 2011
  2. Nintendan

    Nintendan Active Member

    Good... but not really an improvement from the Prime. Darkness Defenders quite cool, but the attack needs more power.
    Most Stage 2 LV.Xs hit for a load of damage.
     
  3. rayquaza2222

    rayquaza2222 New Member

    ^ok how about it does 100 and if you flip tails the attack fails?
    (hey that Rhymes, if tails it fails :lol:)
     
  4. rokman

    rokman <a href="http://pokegym.net/gallery/browseimages.p

    Darkness Fang, 90 damage + poison

    Also, change the body to say for EACH darkness energy...
     
  5. rayquaza2222

    rayquaza2222 New Member

    ^will do..........
     
  6. rokman

    rokman <a href="http://pokegym.net/gallery/browseimages.p

    Weakness fighting x2
    No resistance
    retreat cost 2
     
  7. rayquaza2222

    rayquaza2222 New Member

    ^forgot that..........................
     
  8. Mama_Luigi

    Mama_Luigi New Member

    Imo, you should actually level this up onto the stormfront T-Tar as it has pretty good synergy with the x.
     
  9. rayquaza2222

    rayquaza2222 New Member

    ^I think it would be better to look at the Prime one. Because not many T-tar players use Sf T-tar.
     
  10. rokman

    rokman <a href="http://pokegym.net/gallery/browseimages.p

    Well if this card came out, SF ttar would be played.

    his body + this lv.x body? so good
     
  11. Mama_Luigi

    Mama_Luigi New Member

    The reason T-Tar players don't use SF T-tar is because this doesn't exist.
    This card would completely change T-Tar.
     
  12. rayquaza2222

    rayquaza2222 New Member

    ^SF body?

    I'm sure that most of the energies played in T-tar are sp Dark and little :dark:

    (SF T-tar will go Illegal next season.) (Edit: ninja'd by Mama Luigi)
     
  13. Mama_Luigi

    Mama_Luigi New Member

    Again, this card would completely change T-Tar.
    Also, luxchomp will be rotated next season, does that mean we shouldn't account for it now? (I know terrible analogy)
     
  14. rayquaza2222

    rayquaza2222 New Member

    Yes it would change T-tar. And I guess SF T-tar would be used more if this card was real, but I wouldn't use SF T-tar.
     
  15. rokman

    rokman <a href="http://pokegym.net/gallery/browseimages.p

    Just forget it Mama Luigi.... sigh
     
  16. rayquaza2222

    rayquaza2222 New Member

    I only said what I would do

    I would agree that Sf T-tar would come back into play if this card was real. all I said was I wouldn't use Sf T-tar
     
  17. ArceusRules

    ArceusRules New Member

    I've got only 1 word for this card. BROKEN!

    Seriously! Increasing defense for attaching a Darkness energy. And 90 and poison? That's also very broken!
     
  18. wobbufet

    wobbufet New Member

    This card is FAKE. Not REAL. He can make it however he wants.

    The Card: I like this card, it's not overpowered, yet can be very powerful if you can get a ton of :dark: energy on it, preferably with Darkness Drive :thumb:
     
  19. ArceusRules

    ArceusRules New Member

    People hound on me all the time for making broken cards.
     
  20. flariados

    flariados New Member

    Three energies for 90 and poison isn't that broken when Gyarados can do 90 for no energies and Tyranitar can be done a lot of damage by Toxicroak G. It's a good card nonetheless but not seriously overpowered.
     

Share This Page