Pokémon TCG: Sword and Shield—Brilliant Stars

your FATE is to lose

Status
Not open for further replies.
:eek: No way! This isn't anything like Destiny! Destiny had ONLY basic pokes, no evolutions. This looks like R-Gon if anything.

I'd remove these cards:

1 Lickitung D -Delta Pokes are dead, except in the mirror match, use Castform for draw
1 Chimecho D -A waste of Bench space. If you want Energy just play more
1 Mew D -It just isn't so great now that pokes have less that 100% more damage due to weakness.
1 Latios Ex D -Ex cards aren't seen so much, don't like this guy (I'd replace with Rayquaza ex)

actually, destiny plays egg d
 
States? That is several months away! The metagame will likely be much different by then, I'd worry about more current events like Cities and Battle Roads! What age division will you be playing in? That has a major role on the success of a player/deck?
 
This looks to be more of a Flygon variant than a Destiny variant.

The big difference here is...

Well...

- all those Pokemon
+ a heap of Eeveelutions.
 
Don't stomp kids down for trying to come up with an original deck. v_v;

Rudeness won't get him anywhere.

Anyways!

The deck is very random - it seems to me you're trying to do too much with too little.

-1 latios,
-1 - 1 fearow d
+1 TVR,
+2 Wager
I can't say I'm thrilled with not starting out with riolu - hand advantage is great, but you can have hand advantage the entire game until your opponent throws their Wager. Don't bank to much on personal draw power.

I'd say be nervous about castforms, but if it works for you, go for it.

What do you mean original, this deck was played everywhere last year minus flygon d.
 
lolganium said:
hmm...yeah...uh...hate to tell you...eeveelutions aren't playable any more

Well yes I am aware of that. Destiny was Eeveelutions + some random other crud. You can't get something similiar to R-Gon or Z-Gon or...God knows how many of those there are. I am sure there is one for each letter of the alphabet by now. And call it that.

It is like making a deck with Rayquazas, Absol's and Shiftry's and calling it the new Metanite.
 
you are not calling it the new metanite krucifer
call it a new speed spread variation if you will, but it doesnt even remotely match metanite's strategy
 
you are not calling it the new metanite krucifer
call it a new speed spread variation if you will, but it doesnt even remotely match metanite's strategy

Then how does this "New Destiny" even remotely match Destiny's strategy?

Call it "Fate" all you like. In fact, names are names when it boils down to it. But you cannot call it the "New xinsert archetype herex" when it does not even resemble that archetype.

This deck is a good deck. But it is no way a "New Destiny" in terms of the skill level needed to do things with it, the speed and well...All the technical mumbo jumbo that a deck has when it has 4 Eevees and 7 of its evolutions. And also simply. Because there are no eeveelutions in this deck. :S
 
Then how does this "New Destiny" even remotely match Destiny's strategy?

Call it "Fate" all you like. In fact, names are names when it boils down to it. But you cannot call it the "New xinsert archetype herex" when it does not even resemble that archetype.

This deck is a good deck. But it is no way a "New Destiny" in terms of the skill level needed to do things with it, the speed and well...All the technical mumbo jumbo that a deck has when it has 4 Eevees and 7 of its evolutions. And also simply. Because there are no eeveelutions in this deck. :S

speed spread's strategy was disruption and damage spread
metanite's was all out power and beat down
the deck you described was the former, thus it matches speed spreads strategy more
why not just give your deck its OWN original name, rather than using another one?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top