waterfox17
01/26/2010, 08:48 PM
I noticed that in the Card of the Day thread, people referred to Dialga [G] as being a threatening counter to Kabutops.
Dialga [G]'s first attack reads: "Deafen: Your opponent can't PLAY any Trainer cards or Stadium Cards from his or her hand during their next turn."
Kabutops's first attack reads: "Primal Scythe: You may DISCARD Helix Fossil, Dome Fossil, or Old Amber from your hand. If you do, this attack does 20 damage plus 50 more damage."
If your opponent uses Deafen, I can only assume that people infer that Primal Scythe's extra 50 damage is void because of the trainer ban.
But my qualm is with the words "PLAY" on Dialga [G]'s description, and "DISCARD" on Kabutops's description.
Does it count as PLAYING the card if you discard it, since it's not for the Trainer's described effect, but as a condition of Kabutops's attack?
Can any pokemon professors shed light on this? If there are any rulebook or official statements for a ruling, I'd love a reference.
Dialga [G]'s first attack reads: "Deafen: Your opponent can't PLAY any Trainer cards or Stadium Cards from his or her hand during their next turn."
Kabutops's first attack reads: "Primal Scythe: You may DISCARD Helix Fossil, Dome Fossil, or Old Amber from your hand. If you do, this attack does 20 damage plus 50 more damage."
If your opponent uses Deafen, I can only assume that people infer that Primal Scythe's extra 50 damage is void because of the trainer ban.
But my qualm is with the words "PLAY" on Dialga [G]'s description, and "DISCARD" on Kabutops's description.
Does it count as PLAYING the card if you discard it, since it's not for the Trainer's described effect, but as a condition of Kabutops's attack?
Can any pokemon professors shed light on this? If there are any rulebook or official statements for a ruling, I'd love a reference.