View Full Version : Unexpected Rouge? For nats
06/20/2008, 01:58 PM
4 premier ball
3 warp point
1 energy switch
1 special dark
3 basic dark
This deck is awesome. it uses level x's to pew pew.
Strategy: set up level x's and attack.
I just want to get feedback on how random this is! =D
06/20/2008, 02:52 PM
so random. harry potter all the way.
06/20/2008, 02:59 PM
Truth be, with the fact that your running 12 basics, 4 being VITAL to your deck theme, the fact that your not running 4 great balls and 4 rossanne's is a sin. Why waste celios on the basics when you can use them for the lvl X's.
I'd also try Weville's and moonlights in here, lets every pokemon in the deck abuse darkrai, and with moonlights, you might be able to set up all 3 X in the same turn. It also allows you to pick whoever you want to be active, regardless of who they pick for palkia to be up, and gives you an option to put some major damage on dusknoirs an almost garentee a 1 shot kill on banette ( a huge factor with cresselia taking 2 prizes).
06/20/2008, 03:44 PM
+4 Great Ball
+2 Sneasel DP
+2 Weavile SW
What I would do, based on vadrake's suggestions. Which were very nice.
06/20/2008, 04:25 PM
06/20/2008, 04:29 PM
ily this deck is god. <33333
06/20/2008, 05:56 PM
its not unexpected now.....
Muscovy Level X
06/20/2008, 08:09 PM
How consistant is it? It seems like it wouldn't be.
But seeing the mess of lines reminds me of a deck a run myself: Useing Weavile and Darkrai Lv.X as a power-up. Palkia lv.X is tech with monlight stadium for total control.
-Call is better than Pachi, if you even need either
-Either take Darkrai out, or add in a good Weavile line
-Unless you get Weavile and moonlight in there, 1-1 Palkia would be suficiant. Even if you do, 1-1 can still be concidered.
Here's a sample:
4 Weavile (4 SW or 3 SW, 1 DP)
4 Moonlight Stadium
4 premier ball
2 Dual Ball
4 Dusk Ball
4 special dark
7 basic dark
The only way I justifly Palkia in my deck is that I need Crawdaunt ex.
06/21/2008, 12:47 AM
WoW someone likes GE lol :)
06/21/2008, 08:23 AM
I don't know.... but the strategies might be complicated if you playing this deck.....
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.2 Copyright © 2016 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.