Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 26 to 33 of 33

Thread: What separates the pros from the above average?

  1. #26
    Quote Originally Posted by Rogue Archetype View Post
    Uh... the people who "pick up a deck and win" can do so BECAUSE they've played so much that they're familiar with game-mechanics AND the cards themselves.

    They're NOT playing the cards for the first time, they're just playing your deck for the first time.

    No practice/experience = Average Player at best.
    Bianchi.


    __________
    Or how it's spelled, ha-ha.
    Trading Thread: http://pokegym.net/forums/showthread.php?t=129733 - Refs
    Quote Originally Posted by afstandopleren
    1/ Am I, as European, living in a future for Americans? 2/ how about forcing experienced players to use non-donk decks and force newbies to play CHamp, Kingdra and other Donk decks? 3/ ...Kingdra failed during BRs. 4/ ^^^There is luck involved in Chess

  2. #27
    Adam Vernola put it best, "100 people think they're in the top 25"
    The Truth is Out There. Print Ross' Worlds Deck!!!!!

    "100 players think they're in the top 25." ~ Adam Vernola

  3. #28
    yoyofsho16's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Virginia Beach
    Posts
    4,378
    Images
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by DarthPika View Post
    I think my brother falls into that last category.
    ...which of the 4,000 Miles Bros. are you talking about?
    www.sixprizes.com
    Quote Originally Posted by ryanvergel View Post
    No one cares about what bad deck you are testing. You are a very new senior and are a blip on no one's radar. You could reveal your exact deck and list and nothing would change.
    TEAM HATTER! ...like a boss

  4. #29
    Yeah there might be a lotttt of above average players, but there's only 100 or less really really good players.
    The Truth Is Out There
    You miss 100% of the shots you don't take. ~WG
    AIM: Magnechu; E-Mail: Magnechu@gmail.com
    T4, T8, T16 US Nationals, 2x T32 Worlds, Iron Chef Champion

  5. #30
    1. 60% or better flips
    2. Endorsements
    3. Good Accessories (ie - bandanas, goofy hats, etc.)

  6. #31
    Researching Tower Scientist, Retired Magic_Umbreon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    3,896
    Images
    14
    Nothing, you've either got the talent or you haven't. Now some things will potentially stop a talented player from succeeding, but not the other way around.

  7. #32
    Quote Originally Posted by Magnechu View Post
    Yeah there might be a lotttt of above average players, but there's only 100 or less really really good players.
    I really think the number of really good is around 75 not 100.

    75 top ranked players that could win Nats/Worlds on any give year.

    What about the players who can't go to Nats or Worlds? Do you rank them as really good or Top 75 if they do well at their Regionals?

    That's why I hope they really keep top cut at Nats @ 64 because then it fells like the games best are going at in a years best tournament at least in the US. Maybe out of those 64 about 5 would be "out of place" by either donking their way there or getting really lucky and having favorable match-ups throughout the day. Kind of like March Madness, but in Pokemon. In basketball though their are probably really around 12 teams that are legit contenders.
    Top 4 Midwest Regionals 06-07, 6-3 @ 06-07 Nats, 1st Nats attended
    Top 16 Midwest Regionals 07-08, 08-09
    2nd WI States 06-07, 07-08; 2nd IL States 08-09 (I need to stop taking 2nd at States)
    Top 124 @ 08-09 Nats, Skipped Nats 07-08,09-10
    http://pokegym.net/forums/showthread.php?t=145660

  8. #33
    I think that one thing that shows your mastery of the game is your ability to analyze the weaknesses of the current metagame and make a counter or rogue deck, and/or the ability to analyze your opponent's play (particulary in best of 3 matches) and exploit it to your advantage. This could be something as simple as realizing how to bait them into giving you what you want with a Marley's, or something bigger such as paying attention to what cards they run and maybe keeping track of something such as how many Unown G's you think they run.

    First and third, however, may be entirely separated by luck. For example, I was in a T4 match at Cities last Saturday. Game 1 I won, Game 2 I got donked T1 (yes, he was playing Machamp :/), and Game 2 came down to 2 coin flips. We both had 1 prize left as time was called, his Machamp Lv. X knocked out my Gengar with Strong-Willed, I got tails on the Fainting Spell flip, brought up a benched Mesprit Lv. X, hit him for 300 (weakness/body ftw!), and he got heads for the game (he ko'd me with take out). This match came down to coin flips, and I had a 75% chance to win, yet I still lost. No amount of skill could have made up for that. Also, the T1 donk game 2 was pretty annoying...
    Quote Originally Posted by prodigal_fanboy View Post
    Legos is named Legos because Marcus Tullius Cicero invented the deck as a counter to Catiline's attempts to overthrow the Roman Republic -- it's notoriously hard to overthrow an empire when you can't even Cosmic Power to draw into a fourth legion.
    click the arrow for the full quote

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •