![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
#26 |
|
|
Reshiram and Pokemon Catcher say hi.
- Croatian "quadruple your pleasure" Nidoking
__________________
LL, Dragon's Lair Games, Ft. Lauderdale, FL. "Wynaut" join us?
1st, Miami HP Pre, 15+ & Miami DF Pre, 15+ ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#27 |
|
|
This is stupidly good and makes matchups all-important.
I hate this card with a passion. 2x weakness is horrible compared to +30. 4x weakness is the stupidest thing I've ever heard.
__________________
My Pokemon TCG YouTube Channel:
http://www.youtube.com/user/raenpokemon |
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
Forum Moderator
|
Could be fun, it could theoretically make fun for eeveelutions or 4/6 corner variants.
__________________
Shameless self-promotion:
Interested in the VGC? Want to be the best you can be? Check out my VGC Teambuilding guide here: http://pokegym.net/forums/showthread.php?t=158669 |
|
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
|
Well like i said in another post this would be amazing with keckleon and from riseing rivials and porygon z from great encounters in the ruby and sahphire on format. But i really cant find this good with any thing elise.
|
|
|
|
| These members say thanks for this post: |
|
|
#30 |
![]() |
I could think of an anti-meta deck using that Vileplume, with Excadrill, Rayquaza etc, but that will depend on how the metagame will look like.
But I wouldn't overrate that card. It's a stage 2 after all and very situational. History shows that such cards don't get very successfull - especially not in a metagame with Catcher and Rare Candy handicap so that 1-0-1 techs aren't viable.
__________________
2nd @ German Nationals 2008 with EmpZong 2nd @ German Nationals 2009 with Blaziken 2nd @ German Nationals 2011 with Magnezone/Steelix |
|
|
|
|
|
#31 | |
|
Quote:
Of course, realistically a deck may be able to get by covering only a handful, but then we come back to the earlier point: damage output on Pokemon is so high that even Pokemon EX are unlikely to be safe. The real danger to this card is the tendency of TPC to design something and "forget about it" or at least significantly under estimate it until late in the format, and the fact that despite yearly rotations are set-blocks seem to be built with no clear division every four or five sets. Still, lest I misrepresent myself, I do agree that the damage doubling Weakness needs to go. I've never been good enough at the video games to give anything but a novice's opinion, but if it works out there, it is because of all the other (painfully complex) factors not present in the TCG. Returning to the +X and -Y variable Weakness and Resistance would be much better in the long run for the game, I think. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
Front Page Article Editor
2010 Theme Deck Champion |
Thank goodness we will still have Catcher in the format.
Otherwise it would be dominated by crappy Basics that do 40-50 for 2 + Vileplume.
__________________
Read my article on Blastoise/Keldeo please
UK National Seniors Champion '10 || Worlds Competitor '08, 09, '10, '11 Worlds 2012 Top 32 Masters Division YOU/USEDTO_B E A_LRIGHT_AT/POKE_MON WHAT /HA_PPENED |
|
|
|
|
|
#33 |
|
In all seriousness, would it?
I mean, we have a format full of awesome Basic Pokemon already, that also OHKO or at least nearly OHKO almost everything they face. What's the point of a Sawk hitting 80 for and 160 for ![]() (due to quad Weakness) or a well timed Terrakion hitting for 180 (due to Weakness) because of it's probable-to-trigger extra damage clause was indeed activated? Or a Landorus that can accelerate Energy for itself and otherwise usually survive a hit (and thus get off at least one Gaia Hammer for 160 via normal doubling Weakness)?Fast-weenie hitter backed by a Stage 2 versus huge Pokemon EX often backed by little else. Without Pokemon Catcher I'd say such a deck actually has a chance, but shouldn't dominate, or at least any better than a generic Potpourri style deck (Haymaker that hits most or all Weaknesses). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#34 | ||
|
First things first, we've got another thread on this here. No, not saying that should be "the" thread, just that it exists. We have the catch of this is "News", but the actual discussion of a single card strategy... yeah, better in a non-news forum. Maybe a Mod can merge the threads?
Quote:
How are we likely to run Vileplume, and which build is better than the alternatives?
Quote:
__________________
Last edited by Otaku; 07/02/2012 at 03:44 PM. |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#35 |
|
Front Page Article Editor
2010 Theme Deck Champion |
Probably not.
I just wanted to say 'thank goodness for Catcher'
__________________
Read my article on Blastoise/Keldeo please
UK National Seniors Champion '10 || Worlds Competitor '08, 09, '10, '11 Worlds 2012 Top 32 Masters Division YOU/USEDTO_B E A_LRIGHT_AT/POKE_MON WHAT /HA_PPENED |
|
|
|
|
|
#36 | |
|
Content Developer
Blog Admin Contest Host |
Quote:
This is a single card, not an entire set. So, this discussion so go on in this forum. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#37 |
|
Sounds like maybe a few basic pokemon that do damage, but just not enough (right now), will now be put in decks to exploit weaknesses.
Durant with pluspower to KO Kyurem? Sure! j/k
__________________
6th place MD States 2007, 48th place US Nationals 2007, 8th place Stafford CC 2010, 6th place Mid-Atlantic Regionals 2011, 2nd place Leonardtown BR Spring 2012, Winner Ditto ex CaC Contest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#38 | |
|
|
I posted something about this in my "Rise of the Eeveelutions" thread just yesterday. Figured I could contribute to this discussion by copying and pasting it here....
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#39 |
|
|
Aerodactyl and Twist Mountain could help a Vileplume deck by letting them get away with doing even less damage. It could allow a deck of easy to set up basics work well, and would help Leafeon and Glaceon kill EXs weak to grass and water. However, on paper it seems that there are no obvious ways to abuse the opponents' weakness with Vileplume w/out being over or under-reliant on it. Only time will tell if Vileplume decks will be a strong force in the format, or it will be just another useless card.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#40 |
|
|
Geez. Did everybody forget that Leavanny from NV is still legal?
Leaf Tailor: Each of YOUR pokemon that have any energy attached to it has no weakness.
__________________
Owner, Manifesto EX TCG Blog
Master, California |
|
|
|
|
|
#41 |
|
|
Leavanny is a Stage 2 and is generally too clunky to include in a deck as a tech. Most people will aim to target down the Vileplume itself if Vileplume sees any play at all, rather than use a clunky STage 2 tech.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#42 |
|
it's gonna be that 1-0-1 tech you play when there is nothing left for your deck
__________________
PROUD MEMBER OF TEAM SHENANIGANS
My trade Thread http://pokegym.net/forums/showthread.php?t=173507 Ohio States Top 4 2013 Michigan States Top 4 2013 Top 64 Pokemon National Championships 2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#43 |
|
|
Only if you run Rare Candies, and that would mean that you run Stage 2 pokemon. Empoleon is the only respectably decent Stage 2 right now as far as a BW-on format is concerned. All other decks would need to destroy their consistency just to fit in an EXTREMELY situational tech.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#44 |
|
^are you basing this on no dragon types yet?
__________________
PROUD MEMBER OF TEAM SHENANIGANS
My trade Thread http://pokegym.net/forums/showthread.php?t=173507 Ohio States Top 4 2013 Michigan States Top 4 2013 Top 64 Pokemon National Championships 2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#45 |
|
|
this thing worries me. We could see a nasty counter to the meta with
Vileplume + Terrakion (Kills Dark) + Verizon EP (kills Terrak/Groudon) + Giratina-EX (kills dragons and works with grass energy) or something. Sure people will say it'd be tough in theory and sure catcher would try to kill vileplume, but realisticly it would not be too hard to get 2 vileplumes in play and catcher will be a lot harder to play whenever you want because of the loss of Junk Arm. sure Skyla helps get catcher out, but how many of those are you really gonna play in a format with only 2 hand refresh supporters and 2 draw supporters? Prism and Ether would also make this deck all the more easy to play. Of course, this vileplume won't be released for half a year or so, but something tells me that a deck as consistantly good as Darkrai won't be going away until it gets rotated or some amazing sure-fire counter comes up. Terrakion also is too good to be unused in a format that has an abundance of Darkrai. Just an idea, and I'm sure I'll be getting half a million hateful replies as to why this is irrational and wouldn't work, but even so, Vileplume might not be as insignificant as people think in a format with such powerful basics that counter each other. |
|
|
|
|
|
#46 |
|
|
Huh makes you wish that the Kecleon that was every type was back doesn't it,
|
|
|
|
|
|
#47 |
|
No^
Kecleon isn't dragon type :P
__________________
PROUD MEMBER OF TEAM SHENANIGANS
My trade Thread http://pokegym.net/forums/showthread.php?t=173507 Ohio States Top 4 2013 Michigan States Top 4 2013 Top 64 Pokemon National Championships 2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#48 |
|
|
with all of the over powered basics, its only fair to make a STAGE 2 BE ABLE TO ONE SHOT A BASIC.
__________________
Team Shadow elite![]() top cut worlds grinded into worlds twice secret non meta decks for the win |
|
|
|
|
|
#49 | |||
|
Quote:
...and that's what you'll have to do. We've got Fighting decks running Groudon EX and Landorus already. Their Weakness is Water, not Grass. All the Pokemon in that list are just hitting for normal damage. It sounds suicidal to run a Pokemon EX that has a Weakness with Vileplume; even a fast one is likely to be OHKOed; the max HP is 180 and that means just 45 points of damage (not that it could literally be that number) OHKOs them. As a Pokemon EX, your opponent just has to take it down before said Pokemon EX KOs two Pokemon to break even. So that's now a matter of two Pokemon hitting for about 30 points of damage each for the biggest Pokemon EX! Instead of Leavanny countering this card, it might be needed to use Vileplume effectively itself. I mean, the "weenie rush" idea also suffers: even if you're using non-Evolved Basic Pokemon that need a single Energy to attack and exploit quad Weakness... they are weenies. If their Weakness(es) aren't present, your opponent has a good chance of running over them with normal tactics anyway. Quote:
The converse is not true; if it is easy to draw into a Pokemon Catcher, it still may not be easy to set up two Stage 2 Pokemon. Yes, we are talking two copies of the same Stage 2, but it still takes time and resources. Plus it isn't just setting it up, it is setting it up while pulling, playing, and powering up the Pokemon you need at the moment to exploit Weakness. For many, if you aren't powering them up in a single turn you're not going to be able to build sustainable advantage. The big thing is you counted wrong. We have Professor Juniper, N, Cheren, and Bianca for draw power in the next format. That is four Supporters, not too. Bianca and Cheren aren't ideal, but Cheren has done an adequate job in my play-testing and the Japanese lists I've seen seem to favor Bianca. Maxing out all of them is 12 draw Supporters, and you can run Random Receiver to give better odds of drawing into the one you want. Losing Junk Arm just means no more casually tossing Items for discard costs or being able to recycle a TecH copy as needed. Anything important you just have to run in threes or fours. Quote:
Don't set up people disagreeing with your Theorymon as "hateful replies"; you made your points and I presented my counter-arguments... some of which have already been made earlier in the thread. |
||||
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|