![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
#2 |
|
Won't work. Kecleon's type is that of all BASIC Energies attached. Rainbow and Multi are SPECIAL Energies.
__________________
Every time I think I can't say anything stupider, I prove myself wrong. Maybe I should just stop thinking.
There's an exception to every rule, except this one. This one has two. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
If it doesn't say Basic, it doesn't mean Basic -- I just thought it did say Basic.
__________________
Every time I think I can't say anything stupider, I prove myself wrong. Maybe I should just stop thinking.
There's an exception to every rule, except this one. This one has two. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Uh-uh. Rainbow and Multi Energy are never Basic Energies. They just provide those types.
__________________
Every time I think I can't say anything stupider, I prove myself wrong. Maybe I should just stop thinking.
There's an exception to every rule, except this one. This one has two. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
I'm looking at playing Kecleon in my RainbowBurn v.2 with the new Dragons! Actually, Kecleon can do 4x damage to certain EX Pokemon with double weakness!
__________________
Brian
CISSP, MCSE, retired Pokemon Professor (current project - nordoxandsoaps.com!!) | Mega Refs List |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Trading Mod Supervisor
|
Poké-BODY Energy Variation: Kecleon's type is the same as every type of basic Energy card attached to Kecleon.
Bolded for emphasis. Rainbow Energy and Multi Energy do provide every single type of Basic energy but they never count as Basic Energy cards. If Energy Variation did not contain the word "card" Rainbow Energy would work. Also note Kecleon can never be a Dark type nor Metal type.
__________________
The Compendium
"We are not purposely trying to mess with your minds." - DMTM Indentifier of the Magby Rule. Diamond & Pearl H/W You'd be crazy not to attend the New England Regional Championship. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
I'm intrigued by the comment about double weakness. Seem's like a poke is either weak or not. Has there been a ruling on this?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
There are certain ex Pokemon with two Weaknesses. It has been ruled that such Pokemon, when hit by a Kecleon whose types are both of its weaknesses, take 4X the damage they otherwise would have taken.
__________________
Every time I think I can't say anything stupider, I prove myself wrong. Maybe I should just stop thinking.
There's an exception to every rule, except this one. This one has two. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Quote:
__________________
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
I've been pondering the double weakness thing myself. My question is thus:
What if Kecleon is the type of both the weakness AND resistance of the defending Pokemon? Would they cancel out? Or would you double the damage for weakness, then reduce the damage by 30? Or, even, reduce it by 30, then double it?
__________________
Citizen of England, often known as the "Land Without Pokémon Cards".
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
They wouldn't cancel each other out, but they would both be applied as per the rulebook. First weakness, doubling the attack, then resistance reducing that number by 30.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | ||
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
|
What happens if a Porygon2 coverts a basic energy into, say a darkness energy? Would Keckleon's Poke-body count that as a dark or what it was originally?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
If Porygon2 says that an energy on Kecleon now provides Darkness energy, then no, as the basic energy (now providing dark) would still be a basic Energy Card.
It's just a technicality between "Energy" and "Energy card". It's also one of those things I pick up a lot of other people on, and something I have found that severely restricts some of the cards in my deck. However, it does make a difference in the game, just like the distinction between "Energy" and "Basic Energy"...
__________________
"He who lives more lives than one, more deaths than one must die..." ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Quote:
Or rather under the current set of rullings it doesn't work. If you were to ask MTJimmer you could get a completely different answer from the Ho-oh Porygon2 ruling. The Porygon2 Ho-oh rulling was controversial on the old gym and is still not easy to get your head around. Last edited by NoPoke; 09/18/2003 at 01:51 AM. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
Administrator
|
Quote:
Also, the new Compenium also has them. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
It's in the new Compendium (which is back up, haven't been able to get to it for a couple of days - gotta love VeriSign). My appologies.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 | |
|
Quote:
__________________
Brian
CISSP, MCSE, retired Pokemon Professor (current project - nordoxandsoaps.com!!) | Mega Refs List |
||
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|