![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
#1 |
![]() |
Life without Claydol?
I would like to get some feedback regarding life without Claydol, should it go out in September. Or even, what the game was like before Claydol GE?
I started playing Pokemon during the release of Majestic Dawn, so Claydol has always been a part of the game for me. My Gym leader, Mr. Raichu, put it like this; In order to be a successful Pokemon player, you must do what successful Pokemon players do - run Claydol. So in nearly every deck that I have built, I have had a 2-2 Baltoy - Claydol line. Currently I am toying with an Amphros - Manetric deck and I am trying to stay away from Poke-Powers. During the test games at home I always tend to struggle with the lack of the Claydol draw engine. (This was true with the Scizor deck I built.) So, I am looking for a system, or draw engine, to use that is not dependent on Claydol. I realize what an awesome card Claydol is, and that not much can compare to it, but any ideas, suggestions, or strategies sure would help. Thanks |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
|
Life without Claydol?
I will be so Happy Life without Uxie and Claydol? I'll be dancing around my house in happiness
__________________
Back in Action
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
|
Well... I've been fine without Claydol actually. And seeing how big of an impact Claydol has had on the game, it's a good reason to believe that POP will rotate it out so as to keep the strategy making alive.
__________________
~Renzo
of Pokebeach. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
I have to admit. I haven't built a list with claydol since platinum came out with the exeption of a couple lists I've changed from before like terra. I'd be purfectly fine. I've just notice claydol becoming more of a target then a helper.
For example: Durring a cities when I was playing regi, I noticed so many decks were reliant on claydol I mean I would be losing one turn but then I lock them with mesprit for a couple of turns and then I just kill claydol and they just draw nothing and I basically win. So many decks have not supporter draw anymore and just play claydol. In the next set there is going ot be a supporter that is basically calydol and with that one card, a tech uxie and a consistent trainer engien claydol is dead. So in the end, I'd love to see claydol. Uxie on the otherhand would be enoying. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
|
We will most likely lose Claydol, but we get Staraptor Lv X C and we will still have Uxie.
We also will FINALLY be getting a good multi use supporter in the form of Volkner (or however you spell the 8th gym leader's name). While I love Claydol, it is a bit annoying needed to include him in 9/10 of my deck for it to be consistent, so I will not be overly sad to see him go. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
first double rainbow energy that every1 relied on now claydol curse u pop!!!!!!!!!!!!
__________________
Sig'
http://pokegym.net/forums/showthread.php?t=157078 TRADES ![]() MY YOUTUBE: http://www.youtube.com/user/xuii2 Pack Openings Deck Review Trades BITM and More come take a look ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
What is so wrong with these cards? Uxie and Claydol turn the game into more strategy than randomness. The game is a lot more skill than ever before. Games used to rely a lot more on what you drew into last season before Claydol was released, and the season before that.
__________________
www.sixprizes.com
TEAM HATTER! ...like a boss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
As long as we don't get dumped with nothing like when the Holon Engine was rotated, everything should be fine.
__________________
I <3 1,3,7-trimethyl-1H-purine-2,6(3H,7H)-dione 3,7-dihydro-1,3,7-trimethyl-1H-purine-2,6-dione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
|
What does Staraptor C X do?
__________________
The New Jedi Order
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Quote:
__________________
I <3 1,3,7-trimethyl-1H-purine-2,6(3H,7H)-dione 3,7-dihydro-1,3,7-trimethyl-1H-purine-2,6-dione |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
|
Actually I think some people just love whining and living in the world of "make believe", where they can ignore common sense and established fact about decks in a format and pretend they will do well at anything larger than a City Championship.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Forum Moderator
|
Quote:
![]() Might wanna revise that, Uxie is already over $15, and the Lv X ironically can be got for about as much.
__________________
Shameless self-promotion:
Interested in the VGC? Want to be the best you can be? Check out my VGC Teambuilding guide here: http://pokegym.net/forums/showthread.php?t=158669 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
|
Uxie and Claydol may introduce some strategy, but they shouldn't be ABSOLUTELY necessary to compete. You can definitely make a competitve deck w/o some broken draw staple (seriously, draw six each turn? My MTG friends couldn't believe it)
Unfortunately the way its going, we'll keep getting insanely broken draw staples to keep us going. After Claydol is Uxie. After Uxie is Snorlax lvlx (if we get it) and so and so. |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
![]() |
Why do you all think that Claydol will be gone for sure?
There are 7 DP sets, and if they want to come to PT-one, they'll have to rotate only 3 sets one season. As long as Stormfront is out there, Unown G will have to stay, otherwise some cards would get extremely broken (Dusknoir, Gengar, Machamp). So GE-on is the most likely format for next season imho. btw, there are lots of competitive decks that don't run Claydol und rely on Uxie. At least half of the top cut decks at States in Leiden didn't have Claydol. |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
id like to have furret SW reprinted after claydol leaves. great free searching attack, but not too powerful.
__________________
2010 - 2011 Season Record: 8 - 7
SSBB:Kaz 4983-9636-2838 Sell me things!! My iTraders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
|
Quote:
That's nice, I see 2-3 decks in the previous format who were remotely good without Claydol, AMU, Scizor, and one could argue Gigas didn't need it. Outside of that, I see no deck in the previous format that would not work better with Claydol in it than without. Arguing that you saw few Claydol in ONE CITY is hardly a remotely decent argument. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
After Claydol is gone, we have Uxie, which IMHO, is much better than Claydol. It may not be more consistent, but with UXie Lv.X, it is a good drawer and a great attacker. IT will see play in every deck. But I won't really miss Claydol, but I would have missed it if Plox was still legal with the DREs and Scrambles.
__________________
Grinded in 2 Years in a row (last year in Seniors, this year in Masters)
Youngest person this year in Masters to play in the Grinders and Worlds Proud member- "Team Wolfpack." ![]() Trade Thread: http://pokegym.net/forums/showthread...39#post2307939 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 | |
|
Quote:
I barely saw Claydol in SIX cities. Does that hold a better argument to you?
__________________
At the Dutch Nationals, a deck was stolen from me. It contained 3 Yanmega primes. 3 weeks later, Yanmega takes USA and Canada nationals by storm. I never felt this cheated before. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
|
Dusknoir and Claydol could easily benefit from Claydol more than they would miss the two spots it takes up. My arguement was there were no decks who could more benefit with Claydol than without, you posted two decks who would love to be with Claydol. Good job.
Why would it? That would be your area, not the metagame as a whole. I saw Claydol at every city in 90% of decks. As a whole, there were many more decks relying on Claydol than solely replying on draw without it, and an even higher percentage of decks that won who relied on Claydol. |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 | ||
|
|
Quote:
__________________
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#25 | |
|
Quote:
__________________
I <3 1,3,7-trimethyl-1H-purine-2,6(3H,7H)-dione 3,7-dihydro-1,3,7-trimethyl-1H-purine-2,6-dione |
||
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|