As do most Americans after a stint of Republicans in Office, or when something goes wrong that the "people" dont like.
Thats true for either party. :thumb:
Here's a rule that should be at the top of every casual observer: don't assume anything, especially when throwing around the word "most."
It isn't the stint of "Republicans" being in office that makes Americans so angry, so much as a stint of "Bush."
Re the topic poster: if you're actually keeping close track of this primary contest, then how could you say the Democrats are more interesting? Their debates have degenerated into a Jerry Springer affair: i.e., squabbles over who is the best president for a vaguely-defined 'change," who best honors MLK, who said what about who, etcetc...
Meanwhile, the Republicans are actually debating every relevant issue, including Iraq (Ron Paul makes things very interesting). Sure, they've gotten caught up in one or two minor battles (one instigated by Giuliani versus Paul, and the other instigated by Romney versus Giuliani), but the Republicans are not absolutely
consumed by it.
You know that the former First Lady and the Illinois Senator are going too far when
Howard Dean tells you to calm down. Heeyah!
