Pokémon TCG: Sword and Shield—Brilliant Stars

Masters T50 vs Spring Battle Roads

Spring BR week #2 results

Rank Name Rating Age Div State Country
1 Paul Johnston 1992.56 MA WA US
2 Emmanuel Divens 1914.95 MA MN US
3 Matthew L 1907.38 MA LA US
4 Con L 1895.33 MA MA US
5 Colin M 1895.03 MA MO US
6 Pablo Meza 1891.83 MA DF MX
7 Ian Brander 1890.02 MA CO US
8 Adam Garcia 1880.28 MA TX US
9 kyle sabelhaus 1879.46 MA SC US
10 Jason Klaczynski 1879.25 MA IL US
11 Erik Nance 1874.34 MA NC US
12 Tyler Ninomura 1874.28 MA WA US
13 Austin Reed 1873.41 MA OH US
14 Not Opted Into Rankings 1871.08 MA OR US
15 Breton Brander 1870.65 MA CO US
16 Jay Hornung 1868.38 MA IA US
17 Dustin Zimmerman 1867.78 MA IN US
18 Ulises Santamaría 1867.41 MA DF MX
19 John Kettler 1867.06 MA TX US
20 Josue Palomino 1865.10 MA MX MX
21 Darrell Moreno 1862.23 MA NY US
22 Alex Hill 1860.42 MA FL US
23 Ian Ryave 1859.93 MA PA US
24 Aaron J. Schumacher 1859.91 MA OH US
25 Alex Frezza 1858.58 MA MA US
26 Stephen Silvestro 1856.42 MA FL US
27 Andrew Cox 1849.87 MA MA US
28 Gino Rotondo 1846.05 MA RI US
29 Spencer Nalle 1840.07 MA VA US
30 Bobby Malec 1838.22 MA FL US
31 Michael Perucca 1837.32 MA CO US
32 Andrew Mondak 1836.95 MA OH US
33 Roy (Jr) Roberson 1834.75 MA OK US
34 Frank Diaz 1834.72 MA NJ US
35 Chad Harris 1834.06 MA CA US
36 Matthew Koo 1832.26 MA ON CA
37 Jordan Hill 1832.24 MA NC US
38 Drew Guritzky 1830.45 MA NJ US
39 Eric Craig 1823.35 MA FL US
40 Francisco Avila 1821.13 MA MX MX
41 Miguel Angel Lopez Bernal 1820.83 MA DF MX
42 Ross Cawthon 1818.22 MA WA US
43 David Nájera 1817.48 MA DF MX
44 Roberto sora 1815.55 MA DF MX
45 Randy Abrahamson 1813.91 MA WA US
46 Daniel Rattray 1812.67 MA WA US
47 Chris Fulop 1812.25 MA OH US
48 Josh Bangle 1809.73 MA NV US
49 Kason Day 1809.21 MA MO US
50 Dana Lynch 1808.32 MA TX US
 
Rank Name Rating Age Div State Country
1 Paul Johnston 1992.56 MA WA US
2 Emmanuel Divens 1914.95 MA MN US
3 Matthew L 1907.38 MA LA US
4 Con L 1895.33 MA MA US
5 Colin M 1895.03 MA MO US
6 Pablo Meza 1891.83 MA DF MX
7 Ian Brander 1890.02 MA CO US
8 Adam Garcia 1880.28 MA TX US
9 kyle sabelhaus 1879.46 MA SC US
10 Jason Klaczynski 1879.25 MA IL US
11 Erik Nance 1874.34 MA NC US
12 Tyler Ninomura 1874.28 MA WA US
13 Austin Reed 1873.41 MA OH US
14 Not Opted Into Rankings 1871.08 MA OR US
15 Breton Brander 1870.65 MA CO US
16 Jay Hornung 1868.38 MA IA US
17 Dustin Zimmerman 1867.78 MA IN US
18 Ulises Santamaría 1867.41 MA DF MX
19 John Kettler 1867.06 MA TX US
20 Josue Palomino 1865.10 MA MX MX
21 Darrell Moreno 1862.23 MA NY US
22 Alex Hill 1860.42 MA FL US
23 Ian Ryave 1859.93 MA PA US
24 Aaron J. Schumacher 1859.91 MA OH US
25 Alex Frezza 1858.58 MA MA US
26 Stephen Silvestro 1856.42 MA FL US
27 Andrew Cox 1849.87 MA MA US
28 Gino Rotondo 1846.05 MA RI US
29 Spencer Nalle 1840.07 MA VA US
30 Bobby Malec 1838.22 MA FL US
31 Michael Perucca 1837.32 MA CO US
32 Andrew Mondak 1836.95 MA OH US
33 Roy (Jr) Roberson 1834.75 MA OK US
34 Frank Diaz 1834.72 MA NJ US
35 Chad Harris 1834.06 MA CA US
36 Matthew Koo 1832.26 MA ON CA
37 Jordan Hill 1832.24 MA NC US
38 Drew Guritzky 1830.45 MA NJ US
39 Eric Craig 1823.35 MA FL US
40 Francisco Avila 1821.13 MA MX MX
41 Miguel Angel Lopez Bernal 1820.83 MA DF MX
42 Ross Cawthon 1818.22 MA WA US
43 David Nájera 1817.48 MA DF MX
44 Roberto sora 1815.55 MA DF MX
45 Randy Abrahamson 1813.91 MA WA US
46 Daniel Rattray 1812.67 MA WA US
47 Chris Fulop 1812.25 MA OH US
48 Josh Bangle 1809.73 MA NV US
49 Kason Day 1809.21 MA MO US
50 Dana Lynch 1808.32 MA TX US

I should be moving up quite a bit on Monday morning. I went 11-2 for two tournies. I expect to go up about 13-15 points and move into 29th place on the rankings.

Drew
 
Fianl Top 50 before Nats (I believe)

Rank Name Rating Age Div State Country
1 Paul Johnston 1992.56 MA WA US
2 Emmanuel Divens 1919.16 MA MN US
3 Matthew L 1907.38 MA LA US
4 Con L 1896.64 MA MA US
5 Colin M 1895.03 MA MO US
6 Adam Garcia 1892.30 MA TX US
7 Pablo Meza 1891.83 MA DF MX
8 Ian Brander 1890.02 MA CO US
9 Jason Klaczynski 1886.54 MA IL US
10 John Kettler 1882.35 MA TX US
11 Ulises Santamaría 1879.86 MA DF MX
12 kyle sabelhaus 1879.46 MA SC US
13 Erik Nance 1874.34 MA NC US
14 Tyler Ninomura 1874.28 MA WA US
15 Austin Reed 1873.24 MA OH US
16 Not Opted Into Rankings 1871.08 MA OR US
17 Breton Brander 1870.65 MA CO US
18 Dustin Zimmerman 1869.14 MA IN US
19 Jay Hornung 1868.38 MA IA US
20 Alex Frezza 1867.26 MA MA US
21 Josue Palomino 1866.84 MA MX MX
22 Matthew Koo 1866.28 MA ON CA
23 Aaron J. Schumacher 1864.25 MA OH US
24 Darrell Moreno 1862.23 MA NY US
25 Stephen Silvestro 1862.16 MA FL US
26 Gino Rotondo 1862.00 MA RI US
27 Alex Hill 1860.42 MA FL US
28 Ian Ryave 1859.93 MA PA US
29 Ross Cawthon 1854.80 MA WA US
30 Andrew Cox 1850.95 MA MA US
31 Andrew Mondak 1846.49 MA OH US
32 Drew Guritzky 1846.32 MA NJ US
33 Spencer Nalle 1840.07 MA VA US
34 Bobby Malec 1838.22 MA FL US
35 Michael Perucca 1837.32 MA CO US
36 Frank Diaz 1835.55 MA NJ US
37 Roy (Jr) Roberson 1834.75 MA OK US
38 Francisco Avila 1834.64 MA MX MX
39 Chad Harris 1834.06 MA CA US
40 Chris Fulop 1833.71 MA OH US
41 Jordan Hill 1832.24 MA NC US
42 David Nájera 1826.67 MA DF MX
43 Miguel Angel Lopez Bernal 1824.60 MA DF MX
44 Eric Craig 1823.35 MA FL US
45 Daniel Rattray 1823.15 MA WA US
46 Roberto sora 1821.55 MA DF MX
47 Kason Day 1820.49 MA MO US
48 Randy Abrahamson 1817.22 MA WA US
49 Scott Faust 1815.70 MA IN US
50 Will Berry 1811.51 MA OK US
 
Well, the point threshold is that much greater now...

Before BR's: 1840-ish
After BR's: 1862.

Luckily, I doubt we'll see the overall threshold go "up" too much after nationals...If the top ranked Canadians/Mexicans do not do super at nationals, and the Americans do, then expect it to be as high as 1870.
 
Congratulations (and admiration :smile:) to John Kettler, Ross Cawthon and Matthew Koo for taking home the "biggest gainer" status moving up >=20 spots in the T50!!! Very nice playing.

By my quickie analysis the "play or not" decision isn't too hard to make. If you're very high ranked, playing is unlikely to hurt you (of the top 10 I believe only one moved down and that was just 1 spot). On the other hand if you're on the bubble invitation wise, you should play because the folks who chose not to play dropped between 3 and 4 spots with more movement the lower you were (e.g. Paul didn't move at all but the players around the 20 spot dropped 5 ish. So overall I think there's every reason to play!

-Cory
 
How is this guy, Paul Johnston, so far ahead of everyone?
I mean it doesn't make sense how he is nearly 100 pts. above 2nd place.
It doesn't even seem possible. That's almost like every tournament you participate in you go undefeated, right?
It just doesn't seem like it could happen.
 
Congratulations (and admiration :smile:) to John Kettler, Ross Cawthon and Matthew Koo for taking home the "biggest gainer" status moving up >=20 spots in the T50!!! Very nice playing.

By my quickie analysis the "play or not" decision isn't too hard to make. If you're very high ranked, playing is unlikely to hurt you (of the top 10 I believe only one moved down and that was just 1 spot). On the other hand if you're on the bubble invitation wise, you should play because the folks who chose not to play dropped between 3 and 4 spots with more movement the lower you were (e.g. Paul didn't move at all but the players around the 20 spot dropped 5 ish. So overall I think there's every reason to play!

-Cory

I go 21/20-4 and I get no props. I jumped 20+ Points and 6 spots. I had to clear almost 3 7 POINT GAPS!! :tongue::eek::cool:

How is this guy, Paul Johnston, so far ahead of everyone?
I mean it doesn't make sense how he is nearly 100 pts. above 2nd place.
It doesn't even seem possible. That's almost like every tournament you participate in you go undefeated, right?
It just doesn't seem like it could happen.

Well, when you have a decent rating and you like 11-0 or something at regionals your going to jump a heck of a lot.

Drew
 
I go 21/20-4 and I get no props. I jumped 20+ Points and 6 spots. I had to clear almost 3 7 POINT GAPS!! :tongue::eek::cool:



Well, when you have a decent rating and you like 11-0 or something at regionals your going to jump a heck of a lot.

Drew

yeah, I guess your right.
It just seems kinda ridiculous
 
He was already top 10 after cities and then went 10-1 at states and 11-0 at regs. With those k values, it would take about 105-5 in battle roads to match that gain. (not exactly since states was k 36 not k 40, but close enough).
The current rating system is now heavily based in those 2 tournaments, and of course nats.
 
With that in mind, if you get a good point gain from Battle Roads, then it undoubtedly means something.

I would not have shot up 55 points (the amount it'll roughly be after my last tourney is fixed) if not for the fact that I was consistently beating people who had also top cut my regional - or bubbled via resistance.
 
I am having a really hard time believing Kettler managed to gain around 60 points from BRs. That is unreal. I went 21-4 and only gained around only 22 points. I seriously am baffled. :nonono:

Drew
 
I am having a really hard time believing Kettler managed to gain around 60 points from BRs. That is unreal. I went 21-4 and only gained around only 22 points. I seriously am baffled. :nonono:

Drew

Two reasons:

1) I went a really good record. 28-1 is actually better than last year's 28-2.

2) I played against many high-ranked people. Of my twenty nine games...

*4/29 VS 1500-1599.99

*10/29 VS 1600-1699

*11/29 VS 1700-1799

*4/29 VS 1800-1899


The mean ranking of my battle road opponents is around 1730 - not bad for 8k events, I guess!
 
Yeah, and 28-1 is A LOT better than 21-4. For me, I was gaining 1.75-2.25 pts for most wins, and losing 5.75-6.25 for most losses, so every loss wiped out about 3 wins. So Kettler looks like 25-0, while Drew looks like 9-0. About 3 times higher.
Let's see, I was 43-6 I think. So about 25-0 gain, and I got 60 points like Kettler.
 
Back
Top