You're assuming that Pokemon owes you good cards, which would be nice, but isn't really true. I take kind of a strong stance on this just because I buy singles religiously, and only open packs for fun. I pulled a shiny rayquaza out of the first 32 packs of new cards I got... and nothing else good, at all.
I know this is bumping an old post, but I'll do it anyway since its still relevant.
If I go to a steak house and pay $20 for a steak (or more at a higher end steak house), I assume they are going to give me a good steak. If I thought they were going to give me a crappy steak, i wouldn't order it. Seriously, if you went into a restaurant and said, "Give me the 20 oz" and the waitress informed you that the new cook had no idea how to cook steaks, you probably wouldn't order it. In fact, a big part of any "service" industry is that they are better than their competitor. X steak house makes better steaks than Y steak house, lets go eat there instead. X cleaning company cleans my house awesome every time, Y cleaning company pisses me off every time they come and do a bad job. To assume that I expect good service from those companies seems reasonable to me. If I'm paying you for your product and you can't do it right, I'll go to someone else.
The other side to that is consistency. If I go to a steak house one day and ask for a medium well steak and it comes back more done than I like, next time, I order medium and it comes closer to medium well, that's fine. But, if I go back next time and buy a medium steak to compensate for the too well done steak and the steak is still mooing, I just can't order steak from there. But, lets assume they do have some consistency. I take all of my friends out for steak at a steak house I've frequented for years. I know they over cook their steaks and I've compensated by order one step rarer than I like and its always been perfect for years! So, i take 3 friends out with me at $30 a plate. We order our steaks all at medium (actually wanting medium well) and they all come out....lets just say, below medium rare.
According to your "you expect good cards" theory, i should gladly pay for my bad steaks in either situation and feel foolish for "expecting a good product" from a company that I'm paying.
Lets be honest here. Pokemon sales are doing very well DESPITE the situation of our economy. Personally, I'm going to say its because R&D and Japan has done a pretty good job creating some pretty sweet cards and keeping the format....exciting, if nothing else. When they new sets come out, you want to go buy the cards! I remember when I started playing and SP was dominating the format, the only reason you bought HGSS was for the uncommons. Then, nothing format changing came out in UL, UD offered Vileplume, etc. Lately, an environment that is favorable to sales and a healthy environment has been created by Japan. Then, TPCI gets the cards and makes the cards more favorable to sales and puts the health of the format as a secondary concern. To make it even worse, the last two sets have just had ABSOLUTELY sporadic pull rates, which equates to not being able to get a steak cooked the same way twice. The moral of the story, Pokemon sales late aren't doing as well as they are because of TPCI's decisions, they are doing well because of R&D's decisions.
The Pokemon community is the only community that continually gets the short end of the stick and not only thinks its OK, but thinks you're a jerk (or an idiot) if you expect good service for a product you buy.
Any of you guys looking for ocean front property in Arizona?
The pull rates in this set are just as bad as the last. Lets be honest about it, its a problem. Even if it doesn't bother YOU, I don't understand why it bothers YOU (and the word you is being used as a collective sum of everyone that agrees with the statement to which I'm replying) that other people are upset about it. And, if it doesn't bother YOU, just know, it does some people, like Vaporeon....and me. Total pack wise, I probably bought about 200 packs from DEX. I haven't bought one from Boundaries Crossed...and probably won't actually buy one, other than in drafts.
As far is the fact that its supposed to be a gamble, lets even put gambling ideas into.
Would you buy a lottery ticket that didn't have a win ratio printed on it? Lets say you buy 5 and never win, do you buy a 6th? Lets say you do and even buy as many as....oh, i don't know, $50 more worth and didn't win, would you buy another not knowing what the ratio was like, on the pretext that "its supposed to be a gamble?"
So you buy a lotto (the kinds with drawings) ticket. In the real world, as an example in Texas, the Texas Lotto has 50 numbers (I think, been a while since I've actually bought one, did when it came out anyway). The lottery commission not only has the probably on the website, but its even on the tickets! The probability has nothing to do with sales, but a statistical equation. You can buy tickets and play odds. But, what if they didn't have known odds? All they would have to do is have the first drawing ever with 20 balls, but not tell anyone. Then, next drawing, when everyone comes out to buy tickets, bump it to 40 balls (with out telling them, of course). When people see that it is still reasonably easy to win, when ticket sales go up, bump the drawing to 60 balls (without telling anyone). Then, just wait for the pot to get huge because no one can win and sales are down and everyone hops in to hit the big one, do 60 balls for 5 numbers and 40 balls for the 6th number, jacking probably through the rough. Not know how many balls would be in the drawing, at what point would you quit buying tickets?
One more...what about sports gambling? "Oklahoma is a 4 point favorite." You're betting on the spread. Do I think Alabama can either beat them or be with 3 points and loose? That's how you gamble in sports. Or, sometimes, they give you something like "a 5-1 underdog," which is just stating the odds. If the spread or the odds in sports gambling wasn't stated, would you gamble on it? If you didn't know the spread, you don't know what condition has to be meet, you would never bet on a football gam?. In boxing, if you don't know the odds, you won't know what your payout would be for betting on the underdog, you would never do it.
So, tell me again, why this is ok for Pokemon to expect us to "gamble" but not give us reasonable "odds?" Come on man, even Vegas gives probability...I find it hard to believe if you are going to try and convince me that Vegas has higher moral standards than a family institution like Pokemon.