Recent content by Whicker

I was at OK States today and this situation occurred. During one of my games I opened with Old Amber. Apparently, at this point, one judge that saw my game didn't think that I had an active Pokemon (honestly, I think this was because I had a fossil in play and the judge didn't recognize it as a...

I hate to say this Mike, but I (and POSSIBLY Will, but he's mostly out of the game at this point) am the only one left from Oklahoma that has any interest in attending this event (bet you didn't expect that one, eh?). I think Austin's, Sidney's, etc. success in Colorado last year coupled with...

At times? Someone who trots around their own State Championship and calls people bad to their face (but I suppose saying this at all violates your idea of "humbleness") and criticizes people's play during games (and after too) and then continues to do so up until this very moment even after he...

Oh man, where do I begin? First of all, I didn't know "possibly" was even an issue with you. You always win, right? Just going off what I hear on the Gym. Oh man. 5:30 in the morning. I feel so bad for you. Most of us Pokemon players get up for tournaments around noon and then hobble to our...

What competition? I thought no one could compete with you.

These quotes are why we need a dislike button on the Pokegym.

Q. If I use Aerodactyl GL's "Primal Breath" attack, and on my opponent's turn they switch the Defending Pokemon for a different one, can they then evolve the Pokemon that was attacked by "Primal Breath"? A. Yes. The Primal Breath attack is an effect on the Defending Pokemon, the one that was...

Aerodactyl won't work because they can just Turn/retreat their active and level up the new one.

I only responded to your secondary comment because it was wrong. It has nothing to do with being upset. I'm not one to get upset over a stupid argument. Your last statement proves you aren't listening to me. If you care so much, go back over and read what I'm saying. You're looking at this from...

Come, on Austin. You did not have a Texas bias idea about the DQ at all up until now, but all of a sudden your points change and you're whining about it? Your points have nothing to do with you not being able to continue playing. Stevep: It's not like Austin's deck was randomly chosen to not be...

You still miss the point entirely. It's not okay to not read my post and then quote me. And yes, it was taken out of context, or at least misinterpreted. I said under normal conditions I would agree that it would be unreasonable to DQ someone for an incorrect deck list. However, under the...

Do you know how Gyarados plays? 3 Magikarp and 4 Gyarados (which was on the list) would be a 1-6 deck if you got lucky enough to donk someone. The change presented on the list would have created a MASSIVE change in the outcome of ALL of his games. I don't think anyone except you would argue...

I hate to say this too, but you are missing the point of what I am saying. I agree with you that a DQ is a harsh penalty and rather unfitting. I do not believe that the judges should have made a DQ the penalty for having this sort of mistake on a decklist. I think he should have had to play the...

This is a completely and utterly false statement. I was told at nine (when registration began) that we could opt out of deck checks. Please do not spread false information just to try and make your point.

The game loss, I would argue, is different. In the penalty guidelines it states I should have received a prize loss, not a game loss. However, Fish specifically said you would receive a DQ if your decklist was incorrect. It's irrelevant, however. I wasn't arguing against you, Austin. I know...