DarthPika
New Member
Guess someone else finally thought of Leafeon Lv.x. lol
There was a thread a while a go that had it in it by pikachu*.
Lame-U (L-AMU): Testing the Pixies
- Thread starter Prime
- Start date
Guess someone else finally thought of Leafeon Lv.x. lol
There was a thread a while a go that had it in it by pikachu*.
butlerforhire
New Member
I was just thinking that the "L" in "L-AMU" would actually stand for something with Leafeon lv. X in tow.
I doubt that will happen. Or if it did, people still wouldn't take my results for any value since I wouldn't be using "the list".
I do want to print off some more scans and build a Kingdra deck when I get back from Worlds. Maybe if I work on the AMU list and work on the Kingdra list, I can playtest them against each other. But by that time, BRs will probably be here already. :/
Or...you can do what I did. Go to Kinkos, print off scans, for like $4, get a complete playset of Kingdra and new trainers, and just test it out yourself. It's never good to rely on others for all your guidance. Sometimes, you just have to do it yourself.
As it stands, I've played 28 games with my UMA list, and I've only played 3 games in which I did not have all three Lv. X's out, and I've only lost 1 game. Granted, I have not played against Kingdra, I've not seen a powerhouse Kingdra deck in my area, and as such, I don't get much of a chance, unfortunately.
Irregardless, a lot of the math involved is too ratio based to be running Poke-Radar and Dusk Ball. 1 - 7, 1 - 5, are too low for any set of odds involving so few Pokemon.
I do not run Claydol [ or any other draw support Pokemon ] and rarely come off worse for wear. And in most games, I do the 200 damage three turns in a row. There is enough cycle ability in the format that I, so far, have not come in contact with any major snags in the decklist. And, amusingly enough, I don't run Snowpoint Temple, I run Moonlight Stadium [ because I prefer the LA versions of the basics, ] and it helps the ability to cycle through my basics.
I had enough card-movement in the deck to be able to constantly align my hand to my Opponent's and deal 70 with Mesprit's basic attack - which actually won me the game on more than one occasion because I was constantly knocking out the basics early.
I don't know. We agree on most things, Prime, but your standing on UMA is a bit off, based on the things I've encountered so far.
Irregardless, a lot of the math involved is too ratio based to be running Poke-Radar and Dusk Ball. 1 - 7, 1 - 5, are too low for any set of odds involving so few Pokemon.
I do not run Claydol [ or any other draw support Pokemon ] and rarely come off worse for wear. And in most games, I do the 200 damage three turns in a row. There is enough cycle ability in the format that I, so far, have not come in contact with any major snags in the decklist. And, amusingly enough, I don't run Snowpoint Temple, I run Moonlight Stadium [ because I prefer the LA versions of the basics, ] and it helps the ability to cycle through my basics.
I had enough card-movement in the deck to be able to constantly align my hand to my Opponent's and deal 70 with Mesprit's basic attack - which actually won me the game on more than one occasion because I was constantly knocking out the basics early.
I don't know. We agree on most things, Prime, but your standing on UMA is a bit off, based on the things I've encountered so far.
Great to hear your having success with the deck Steven. Thanks for the information.
I've looked at a lot of the LA cards and am totally not even interested in UMA anymore. There are just too many things that just dwarf the deck totally.
Please keep posting and contributing to the conversations, though.
I've looked at a lot of the LA cards and am totally not even interested in UMA anymore. There are just too many things that just dwarf the deck totally.
Please keep posting and contributing to the conversations, though.
~`Flygon`~
New Member
DeathBerry
New Member
It's cuz their format is shifting to DP-On. With things that actually made the deck goood(Gardy pk i hear) rotated, it's pretty much equivalent to DP-on GG.
DarthPika
New Member
Actually Leafeon lv.x was used with it, not so much Gardy PK.
Keep in mind that they have IFDS, and that AMU has a hard time with some of the cards in that set.
Well, I know a player that played the PCL guys. One had a pixie deck and a Kindra deck built. The pixies were tough to beat, but his build had no way to counter mewtwo X, he simply said he loses to mewtwo (ergo, no evos in his style deck). The also didnt have leafy X in their pixie deck. Take that for what you want.
Keith
Keith
Like Dusknoir...
LOL @ using Leafeon for energy accel. Energy Pickup is clearly the play. Trainer >>>>>>>>> Stage 1 Lv. X, even on a coinflip.
Like that deck isn't expensive enough.
Japanese people:
So we now got AMU how can we spend more money on our deck to have the most expensive in the world?
Other one:
Let's add Leafeon lvx, it's expensive and we have energy accelaration for mesprit!
First guy:
Yeah now we have the most expensive deck ever!
Japanese people:
So we now got AMU how can we spend more money on our deck to have the most expensive in the world?
Other one:
Let's add Leafeon lvx, it's expensive and we have energy accelaration for mesprit!
First guy:
Yeah now we have the most expensive deck ever!
DarthPika
New Member
Your forgetting that Leafeon would also serve as an alternate attacker, Mewtwo killer, help the Kingdra matchup.
XYZ_Sniper
New Member
I read the first page and decided to stop reading. IMHO prime I have Tested this deck and it has great potential, granted the player knows what to do. I recomend call as a bonus and help set up. And I agree people who have not tested the deck don't go hateing it because the deck seems complicated and other bogus reasons
DeathBerry
New Member
No they didn't. They DID use Gardy. It was a 2-1-2 line I believe, or maybe just 1-0-1.
Give it up, the leafeon is a waste. Why kick a dead horse before it is even alive? I 2-0'd a version at worlds with leafeon with one of my top decks for next season and I have yet to test the luxray match-up which I should win with relative ease. The JPN players did indeed say it was not good they were trading these things away to dizzy american players like it was nothing.
I'm seeing this alot ...
Pokemon:
2-2 Mesprit LV X (MT)
2-2 Azelf LV X (LA)
2-2 Uxie LV X (LA)
1-1 Mewtwo LV X (MD)
1-1 Mightyena (LA)
TRAINERS:
4 Roseanne
4 Bebe's Search
4 Premier Ball
4 Quick Ball
1 Time-Space Distortion
2 Night Maintenance
2 Energy Pickup
3 Warp point
3 Snowpoint Temple
2 Cynthia's Feelings
I figure the Quick ball GUARANTEES the pokemon whereas PokeRadar is a glorified Duskball ..
thoughts ?
Energy:
13 Psychic
2 Multi
Pokemon:
2-2 Mesprit LV X (MT)
2-2 Azelf LV X (LA)
2-2 Uxie LV X (LA)
1-1 Mewtwo LV X (MD)
1-1 Mightyena (LA)
TRAINERS:
4 Roseanne
4 Bebe's Search
4 Premier Ball
4 Quick Ball
1 Time-Space Distortion
2 Night Maintenance
2 Energy Pickup
3 Warp point
3 Snowpoint Temple
2 Cynthia's Feelings
I figure the Quick ball GUARANTEES the pokemon whereas PokeRadar is a glorified Duskball ..
thoughts ?
Energy:
13 Psychic
2 Multi
DarthPika
New Member
What deck did you use against it? If you used one with a good matchup against AMU then its dumb to say how you won. Saying you beat AMU means little if you don't say what you beat it with. >_>