Search results

1st, I think Chandelure would be a nice attacker. It can cause 30 damage in 3 pokemon simultaneously for only ONE enrgy, and for two (thought discarded) it can Inferno the opponent for 80 damage and 40 damage burn! Doesn't sound useful? 2nd, I mean a deck consisting mostlyof LEGENDS, with...

1st, I didn't delete the thread. 2nd, I tried this deck in PlayTCG, and I admit it didn't go out as thought, especially with Dark Explorers. I like that Simisear idea (with Chandelure added) However, I'm also thinking of a LEGEND deck. What do you think?

Here is my third deck, with a lot of changes. First, I decreased the number of Pokemon (still a good lot-27-, but a little less is still less) Second, added more Trainer cards. I know that 2 Supporter maybe sound not enough. This time, I'm concentrating in the use of the three basic elemental...

Sorry, I had a typo. I meant a Lighting Pokemon.

I actually think of fitting one Lost World in my next deck. As you said, nobody would think that a Deck that has nothing to do with it would contain it.

:nonono:No no no no no, you didn't nderstand me. I mean that , if he uses them at a Fire Pokemon, then he won't have any Fighting Energies to put in his Fighting Pokemon. And moving Special Energy cards from Pokemon to Pokemon is a litle more difficult in the current format...

1st, what do you mean by "meat-shield"? 2nd, what I tried to say was that, in early game, Flipctini can help the basics with a little boost. I I didn't, they were fully toasted. And, as I don't run Revives in this deck, I was toasted, too. Flipctini is just a chance for them to survive-...

Noone mentioned neihter Bebe's Search nor Pokedex Handy.

At first, should I say that the only members that comment my topics are CoMiT and X Empoleon X (oh, and Evil Psyduck, as I have a problem with giving the right amount of cards:biggrin::lol::biggrin:) Come on, don't be shy, I need the opinion of a lot of people. As of X Empoleon X's comment...

I know-now. I learned it a little after my post.

Yeah, but it can be used as fire energy, too. If he uses it as fire energy, then that means no fighting energy cards!

What do you mean by RDL?:confused:

Actually, Zekrom and Zekrom EX have the same name, so you need to eiter remove the Zekrom EX or one Zekrom (of cource, removing one Zekrom is more logical)

Thanks CoMiT, but actually, I hate following ides that everyone uses, like Rare Candy. I mostly try to build decks that can prove that items like these should not be in the list of "nessessary. Maybe because I don't have a lot of cards (at least in present. I had a lot of cards, but I'm from the...

I'm sorry, I thought you told me that I had 57 cards in my previous topic, so I added three. Well, it is easily fixed.

Here I am again, with the second deck of mine! This time, I found that some Items and Supporters are nesessary, so it is no longer just pokemon-energies. Also, all cards are format legal. Of cource, it is not perfect yet, so tell me your opinion! PS:For another time, I would appreciate you...

Thanks a loyt X Empoleon X, but I'm not beginner. I know every single benefit of Items and Supporters. I just tried to substitute some of them. For example, Electrode's Energy switch was a substitute of Exp. Sharing a Rainbow Energy, Raichu's Split Ball was a Substitute of two Energy Switches...

The strategy of this deck was to have each Pokemon get powered by the cards lost by the pevious one, so trainers were not something very important in this deck. If used carefully, it had opportunities. But who cares? I cxannot use it. I wanted to use it in a competition!(of cource, after asking...

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!! What am I going to do now? I need to make it from scratch now!

Oh no! you mean only Diamond and Pearl, or all of its expansions?