Pokémon TCG: Sword and Shield—Brilliant Stars

After all these years I finally did it

Status
Not open for further replies.
Since the original debate of the thread revolved around Crinus's diss and why it was wrong, I'm not really sure what you expect the "debate" to be. At this point, having a debate concerning (what I believe you're intending it to be anyway) whether Majora's Mask is good or not isn't really the original conversation.

Crinus stated it wasn't a zelda game.

The key counters to this phrase (the phrase which people had a problem with and argued about):

In the title it states "Legend of Zelda"

It was created by Nintendo, making it official canon.

It is placed in the Legend of Zelda universe.


The "debate" on the topic of discussion brought up is cut-and-dry.


---
Also, though I respect you in telling us what we CAN'T post, telling us to do something: "continue debate" seems highly improper and a command.
 
Last edited:
I click this thread, read the OP, and it's talking about praises for beating a super hard game... I scroll down, and everyone is arguing! I feel this thread is pointless! Congrats on the win buddy, but please... What is the point of arguing? Can't you guys agree to disagree?
Posted with Mobile style...
 
I click this thread, read the OP, and it's talking about praises for beating a super hard game... I scroll down, and everyone is arguing! I feel this thread is pointless! Congrats on the win buddy, but please... What is the point of arguing? Can't you guys agree to disagree?
Posted with Mobile style...

Yeah that seems to happen quite alot in alot of my post.
 
To be fair, I never thought MM was that great, it always felt like half a game to me personally, while trying to distract you with mask collecting. But still, it's ridiculously easy to beat, even with the whole 3 day constraint.

Besides, if you cheated using an online guide for Zelda 2, why does that make you feel so differently with MM?
 
Well I didnt really use an online guide for nothing else but to find where the boss is in the great palace, I got sick of roaming that big place to never find the boss.

The place is so ridiculous you get a fairy and 1up link before getting to the boss.
 
MM is my favorite zelda game IMO.
When you first play it, it starts out really confusing, most people quit because of the time limit. The character depth and the theories that were developed from this game were phenomenal. Once you get the ocarina back, the game starts to have familiar aspects to it, but takes a lot more strategic thinking to complete.
The game is my favorite because of it's darkness IMO.
 
This statement leads me to think you have never even played it before. How can you say you don't like a game when you haven't even played it?

Well, off the top of my head:


  1. The game contains content I find objectionable. It doesn't matter if the underlying game mechanics are genius if I have to subject myself to material I consider harmful.
  2. The game style is one I have never enjoyed before, even with similar games (prequels sequels) I have played, thus is seems unlikely that specific title will do something different enough to be worth my time (and possibly money if it isn't being loaned to me by someone).
Please note that I love The Legend of Zelda series as a whole, and of the games I have played Majora's Mask was phenomenal! I just have often been on the receiving end of ultimatedra's argument (from other people) and know that when phrased that way, it is flawed. Likewise I've had people try to extrapolate it from something like foods or gaming and then things really get messy (there are many behaviors I have never tried and hope never to try).


Now in Crinus case it seems odd since he states he enjoys so many other titles in the series, and I don't understand his complaint about combat, save oh yeah, the game starts you off as a Deku Scrub. Crinus did you ever get past that point? Once you do combat gets to the point of being like OoT, and as the game expands it goes beyond OoT as you enjoy learning how to fight as a Goron and Zora!


When I write on the internet, I do not care to be grammatically correct.

If I were to write a novel or English essay, then perhaps.

Your logic is flawed. It is common courtesy to attempt to use proper grammar and spelling. Not using it is considered an insult. If you cannot use it, that is fine. Your argument is the equivalent to someone who refuses to speak clearly unless giving a speech. So everyday life is frustrating for people interacting with such a person, because sometimes he mumbles, sometimes he whispers, sometimes he shouts... and in the end it almost always garbles what he says.

Please have common courtesy to attempt proper written communication. Most of us are more than willing to accept some online shorthand here or there, but abusing the language just because you don't want to capitalize a proper noun or use the correct punctuation makes your posts frustrating to read and sometimes even insulting.

On Topic: Congratulations on beating Zelda II, Crinus. I never did beat that one myself and when I sold off my games, it had to go too of course. Not sure exactly how far I made it, I just know I was nearing the end. I might have made it to Shadow Link once, but if I did I am sure I died to his stabbity rage.

Now... why the shame/hate for using guides? I recognize the accomplishment of a player who beats a game using only his own wits and exploration, but not everyone can take the time to do that or finds it enjoyable. Not surprisingly I fall into the camp of wanting to "enjoy" my game, and I regularly use guides. Most of this stems from hating to "miss" stuff and then having to play the game again just for that thing I missed and honestly being a bit of a perfectionist. "Simplistic" games where there isn't something to miss are usually the ones I can skip the guides for, or at least come back and use them later should I need them.

I know this is a common opinion, but I find it so odd: do the people who feel it is wrong to use a strategy guide or seek help with a tricky spot in a game find the idea of anything but self-education equally offensive? That if you had to have a teacher or tutor help you (at all) you "cheated" in your education? :lol:
 
Depends on the teacher, depends on the guide. You'll have to be more specific since quite frankly I was being generous: I should have compared it to guide versus textbook, but since guides are able to focus on a more specific set of circumstances, I upped the comparison.

I also was including help from actual people too, now that I think about it. I know I've had to have a friend "show me how to do that" before.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top