No, but one bad decision on TPCi's part will last forever. Then the next time they're in a messy situation (which is bound to happen) we'll remember back to how oh so very well they handled it last time. Then, eventually we'll get tired of them screwing the game over and we'll quit.It's just one year.
*SPAM*
One bad year is not going to ruin everything.
Spirit of the Game said:As a game of skill, the Pokémon TCG is enjoyed for its complex strategies, entertaining characters, and atmosphere of friendly competition. While the objective of a Pokémon TCG tournament is to determine the skill level of each player involved, our ultimate goal is to ensure that every participant has fun. It is this attitude that Play! Pokémon wishes to emphasize during Pokémon TCG events.
Cobi: No, you can't limit the playing of a card to one per turn - that's the same as errata'ing the card.
"Almighty Golden Garchomp": You're wrong. nobody in here is being impatient - we're all patiently waiting for P!P to fix the problem, save the next four month of OP, and secure its company's bottom line.
What this thread is about, though, is anxiety. Players are anxiously awaiting an announcement, and because they are anxious, their patience is wearing thin.
http://www.pokemon.com/us/organized-play/about/
Click the quote for the source.
No it isn't. I've already explained why in this very thread.Going by that it makes the problems with the format, whatever they may be, the fault of the players. It doesn't say that TCPi is responsible for what people do in the format. When you see someone playing a donk deck like the Sabeleye everyone is hysterical over, I hope you have something to say to them about it and don't just talk strongly on the PokeGym forum.
Pretty much this.
This is a competitive game. You pick the deck that gives you the best chance at winning no matter what. There are certain personal factors that are involved in this. You might play better with spread decks, you might be exceptionally good with tanks. Doesn't really matter, you choose the best deck for you.
Just because you are playing a certain deck doesn't mean you like how the deck works or like how the current format is or like whatever. If you wish to actually have a chance at competing you are forced to play certain decks. You can either play one of the best decks in the format, or you can come up with your own rogue to counter the best decks in the format (and even then, your rogue deck will become popular and you're back to square one). Those are your only two options. Usually, it's a lot easier to go with the first option.
tl;dr: If you want to play competitively, you have very few options available to you, but you don't necessarily have to like any of them. Right now we're at a point in time where a lot of people don't like the options available to them. There will always be people who aren't happy with something in the game, but right now I think people have the right to complain.
The personal factor is currently missing from the game. What good is writing music if you don't play with emotion? Similarly, what good is it playing a game when you're not having fun? People can't connect with the game at a personal level with the current format the way it is.
It's a loaded question.
It's TPCi's ultimate goal to ensure that every participant has fun, not mine or yours, or anyone else's. My ultimate goal is to win the tournament at all costs, while staying within the rules, of course.
It is allowed under those rules, and that's why people will play the deck! However, I cited TPCi's ideals, and the nature of the deck, and this entire format, obviously goes against those ideals. They're the only ones who have power to change the format, therefor it is their responsibility alone.Sabledonk as it stands is allowed in those rules. Are people really upset that it will ruin the game and its spirit for others or is it just self interest? That those who want to win at all costs actually know the upsetting reality that it can and will throw a wrench into their gears and shut them down?