Discussion in 'Deck Help and Strategy' started by Jayson, Nov 16, 2007.
I think mentor needs to be added, 2 roseanne's probably wont allow you to get your bench set up quick enough to start getting your crobats set up. Also, I would bump the cessation crystals to 3 just because they help so much against decks that rely on powers. Another problem I see in here is the type of draw support your running, most of it is forcing you to shuffle your hand back into your deck, I would run something like
3 Tv reporter/ Oaks visit (straight draw cards always help in decks like this.)
2 Stevens (all around good card, great for recovery, and straight draw.)
1 copy cat (2 is kind of over-doing it, some times you want to keep your hand.)
Lastly, 4 double rainbow energy probably isn't necessary, although it assures you can snipe with crobat right away, it still subtracts damage away from the attack. I would take out 1 or 2 and add in 2 scrambles, because scrambles are nice recovery cards, and lickylicky requires a ton of energy, so the scramble energies might help that problem too.
AMAZING deck. I applaud you for making a semi-playable lickilicky list. in fact, i think i love you now.
But I'll leave the sig combo!
Wow...like a previous post, I applaud you. When I first looked at Lickylicky...I was wondering why it was holo. I've always liked Crobat, too. I'm going to try this for fun. Thanks for posting this. I really like it.
i wouldnt use the old licky.
2x fighting weakness yikes. plus theres rarely any more delta pokes being played. but drawing 2 cards is pretty good, i guess.
but, new licky can deal 10 and half chance for paralysis. i think that's better.
yea i'd probably go 2 new licky 1 old licky for colorful fun.
you could try out -1/1/1 crobat and a rare candy for 4 absol. you toxic them while you ruin their hand and get ready to snipe. that way, either absol or lickitung is a good start.
yea cacturne d would be cool with crobat... if you could get the amphy line up it would be amazing.
You guys shouldn't be applauding Jayson for any of this. He DID NOT CREATE THIS DECK, Chriscobi634 did. If anyone should take credit for the deck it should be him.
Second of all is why would you do this Jayson? How dare you! You get on Marriland boards, take a deck idea that isn't even yours, post it on the gym w/o permission, don't even give Chris any credit for it.:nonono:
I used a concept that was mentioned once or twice on a private forum several months ago, did a lot of work and play testing with it, and came up with an excellent deck that I was very proud of. If I was out of line in doing this I apologize. I never took credit for the idea but I won't apologize for taking credit for the work I did to find said idea's full potential.
In any case I've edited out all the information I've posted in this thread so it's a moot point now.
you already mentioned it so why delete it now?
you could at least have named me somewhere or if not that at least ask me if you could post it. Whether you did a lot of playtesting or not, I still saw a few flaws in the list.
Now why would you want to close the thread? So other people don't see that your not trustworthy of any private forum or almost any info. on decks or cards. Needless to say, I'll try to get you ban on Marrilland, if my teammates don't agree then I'll quit the team. So thanks for all the negative things you have done in this post.
I too should learn a lesson, I'll keep my ideas a little bit more secret. Even the vibrava/memory berry/crystal beach post in my "format on the rise" was wrong of me too do. But I hope it's also a back hand to the face of "netdeckers" or "deckcopiers", this is one of the reason why the more creative minds in the game don't like to post many of their ideas.
Separate names with a comma.