Kiss_n_Fire
New Member
The metagame is changing my childrens perspective on Pokemon playing.
It is a very sad day indeed when my children come up to me and say "Mom, I need to play Gardevoir/Gallade or Magmortar". It is disenchanting that my children cannot be creative because the other childrens parents/older siblings/etc. are building them decks simply to crush others. Why doesn't Pokemon make a rule that a deck used in a tournament by a player cannot be used in their next tournament? Yes, it would be a daunting task to go through each and every deck list and reference it with previous...but, this could be dealt with easily as well. A site made where you MUST pre-register your decklist (say a week in advance) before a tournament. First of all it would stop all the line hustle and bustle and secondly...this rule would be made possible. Not that I think it would EVER happen, but it should. I know everyone has a competitive nature and everyone of course wants to win but when a 9 year old comes to me and tells me that he is tired of loosing to "stupid gardy/gallade"....there is a problem. Shouldn't children (most certainly) in Juniors division be using their imagination and having fun and enjoying themselves? For heavens sake...if you are going to a Pokemon event with crushing another deck in mind merely for a win with ratings...you have issues.
I see several issues with the formats in tournament play.
Age divisions:
The junior division, senior division, and masters...I think we need another division or two here. I have a child in both junior and senior divisions. My senior cannot win due to the age bracket. There are "teens" in his group that are almost to the masters division with nothing but winning in mind and with better reading skills, better concentration, and longer play time. In my opinion, divisions should look and run as such...
-Pre Juniors:6-11
-Juniors:12-16
-Masters:17-25
-Seniors:26+
You are probably asking your self "what in the world is she talking about"? Well, my reasonings are as follows. I think Pre Juniors should have tournaments of their own where creativity plays a major role. No rares tourney (for ex.) is a great way to show off your creativity. A tourney where they cannot use any poke abilities is another great way for the children to still be creative and learn while not getting CRUSHED. Winning a tourney in this age bracket should yeild prizes such as a DS/cards/trophy. I will go into Juniors now. At the age bracket I have mentioned, children are starting to get more competetive and their skill levels are going to be about the same with the same amount of drive. I think winning a tourney at this age should qualify for a scholarship/cards/trophy. Moving onto Masters. This age bracket is generally for the Professors and those still into Pokemon and the skill level and age bracket aren't too far askew. Winning here should still give the person an opportunity to receive a scholarship/cards/trophy. Lastly, Seniors...ahh yes...myself and husband included. Most people 26 and over are playing because their children do. It's something to do while the children are playing their tournaments. To be honest...when I am playing in a tournament, winning is not really on my mind. I could care less. I am playing because my children love Pokemon and because it is a family event for us. Why should someone in this age bracket be given a scholarship? No...take it away from this age group and give more to the younger kids. Give cards/trophy to winners in this division. Pokemon needs to get back to the CHILDREN!!!!
Time:
Nationals this year was horrific. Just because X amount of people show up...should not mean that children should play Pokemon for 10 hours. That is ridiculous. Both of my kids were tired, un-focused, and ended up dropping because they just couldn't do it anymore. I even heard a lady have the nerve to tell her 7/8yr old "NO, you are going to keep playing..I don't care how tired you are!! You have won 4 and lost 1 round. You WILL NOT drop out and if you don't stop whining I will whip your butt." WHAT??? This is sickening and dishearting to me. Why would you FORCE your child to play?? But it is a bit of Pokemon's fault as well. Running a tournament for 10 hours on children that age just is not appropriate. Sure, Masters can handle that...but kids cannot.
Lack of Tournaments:
In my opinon there should be more tournaments so that our children can play more events and get more experience. My kids battle at least a couple times a day and we attend league night once a week but a tournament is a much different setting. We have 7 (if I am correct) tournaments a year. Worlds, Nationals, Regionals, States, Cities, BR Autumn, BR Spring. That's it. I think having more tournaments would help out our kids.
I am sorry if you do not agree with me on this, but I am seeing things in a different light from my childrens eyes. They should not come to me crying due to the reasons above. Thank you for reading my rant and any comments are welcome. Have a wonderful day!!:tongue:
It is a very sad day indeed when my children come up to me and say "Mom, I need to play Gardevoir/Gallade or Magmortar". It is disenchanting that my children cannot be creative because the other childrens parents/older siblings/etc. are building them decks simply to crush others. Why doesn't Pokemon make a rule that a deck used in a tournament by a player cannot be used in their next tournament? Yes, it would be a daunting task to go through each and every deck list and reference it with previous...but, this could be dealt with easily as well. A site made where you MUST pre-register your decklist (say a week in advance) before a tournament. First of all it would stop all the line hustle and bustle and secondly...this rule would be made possible. Not that I think it would EVER happen, but it should. I know everyone has a competitive nature and everyone of course wants to win but when a 9 year old comes to me and tells me that he is tired of loosing to "stupid gardy/gallade"....there is a problem. Shouldn't children (most certainly) in Juniors division be using their imagination and having fun and enjoying themselves? For heavens sake...if you are going to a Pokemon event with crushing another deck in mind merely for a win with ratings...you have issues.
I see several issues with the formats in tournament play.
Age divisions:
The junior division, senior division, and masters...I think we need another division or two here. I have a child in both junior and senior divisions. My senior cannot win due to the age bracket. There are "teens" in his group that are almost to the masters division with nothing but winning in mind and with better reading skills, better concentration, and longer play time. In my opinion, divisions should look and run as such...
-Pre Juniors:6-11
-Juniors:12-16
-Masters:17-25
-Seniors:26+
You are probably asking your self "what in the world is she talking about"? Well, my reasonings are as follows. I think Pre Juniors should have tournaments of their own where creativity plays a major role. No rares tourney (for ex.) is a great way to show off your creativity. A tourney where they cannot use any poke abilities is another great way for the children to still be creative and learn while not getting CRUSHED. Winning a tourney in this age bracket should yeild prizes such as a DS/cards/trophy. I will go into Juniors now. At the age bracket I have mentioned, children are starting to get more competetive and their skill levels are going to be about the same with the same amount of drive. I think winning a tourney at this age should qualify for a scholarship/cards/trophy. Moving onto Masters. This age bracket is generally for the Professors and those still into Pokemon and the skill level and age bracket aren't too far askew. Winning here should still give the person an opportunity to receive a scholarship/cards/trophy. Lastly, Seniors...ahh yes...myself and husband included. Most people 26 and over are playing because their children do. It's something to do while the children are playing their tournaments. To be honest...when I am playing in a tournament, winning is not really on my mind. I could care less. I am playing because my children love Pokemon and because it is a family event for us. Why should someone in this age bracket be given a scholarship? No...take it away from this age group and give more to the younger kids. Give cards/trophy to winners in this division. Pokemon needs to get back to the CHILDREN!!!!
Time:
Nationals this year was horrific. Just because X amount of people show up...should not mean that children should play Pokemon for 10 hours. That is ridiculous. Both of my kids were tired, un-focused, and ended up dropping because they just couldn't do it anymore. I even heard a lady have the nerve to tell her 7/8yr old "NO, you are going to keep playing..I don't care how tired you are!! You have won 4 and lost 1 round. You WILL NOT drop out and if you don't stop whining I will whip your butt." WHAT??? This is sickening and dishearting to me. Why would you FORCE your child to play?? But it is a bit of Pokemon's fault as well. Running a tournament for 10 hours on children that age just is not appropriate. Sure, Masters can handle that...but kids cannot.
Lack of Tournaments:
In my opinon there should be more tournaments so that our children can play more events and get more experience. My kids battle at least a couple times a day and we attend league night once a week but a tournament is a much different setting. We have 7 (if I am correct) tournaments a year. Worlds, Nationals, Regionals, States, Cities, BR Autumn, BR Spring. That's it. I think having more tournaments would help out our kids.
I am sorry if you do not agree with me on this, but I am seeing things in a different light from my childrens eyes. They should not come to me crying due to the reasons above. Thank you for reading my rant and any comments are welcome. Have a wonderful day!!:tongue: