ShinySwampert
New Member
Why would you ever play more than 1? If it's prized, oh well. That's like saying all tech lines should be 2-2 or higher because a piece of it could be prized.
My thoughts precisely. More than 1 is wasted deck space.
Why would you ever play more than 1? If it's prized, oh well. That's like saying all tech lines should be 2-2 or higher because a piece of it could be prized.
Why would you ever play more than 1? If it's prized, oh well. That's like saying all tech lines should be 2-2 or higher because a piece of it could be prized.
Not quite. All tech lines should be 1-1 because there's Azelf LA. Azelf can't get you Trainer cards, so ...
Agreed. Your 2 card tech just became 3. Might as well throw in the 4th card and forget Azelf; it takes up bench space, and is useless after you Time Walk.Bplz, that's already increasing it to 3 cards. Plus, if I'm not mistaken, you get to remember the order of the prizes, so just memorize where the Lux Ball is if it is indeed there and draw it the next you draw a prize.
Bplz, that's already increasing it to 3 cards. Plus, if I'm not mistaken, you get to remember the order of the prizes, so just memorize where the Lux Ball is if it is indeed there and draw it the next you draw a prize.
Playing more than 1 is nothing to do with it being prized. Its to increase the chances of drawing into/starting with 1. Playing only 1 of these is a major misplay. Almost every deck has a certain quantity of cards that become dead at some point, its really not THAT big a deal. Flick them away when neccesary, or just, like, keep Claydolling them away.
The point is you're going to want to be able to use 1 EARLY most of the time. And, like, having more than 1 obviously makes it more likely. Anyone with decent experience of actually playing this game will know that fast and consistent openings are WAY more important than not having a couple of dead cards later on. Being able to use a Draw Supporter and THEN search ANY pokemon, on the SAME turn, say t2-t3 is just MONUMENTAL. This is the best trainer printed since Holon Transceiver. Unless you're running a L.X heavy deck such as STK then you NEED at least 2 Luxury Ball.
Switch two Bebe's for 2 Luxury ball? Yeah right. Maybe you don't, but I tend to use more than 1 Bebe per match. I've probably never used all 4, but at least I can.Its the non-supporter aspect that swings it. Even if that means switching a Bebe or 2 for Luxury Balls. You MASSIVELY increase the chances of being able to use one or the other T2. Which means you're almost guaranteed any Stage 1.. be it Claydol or whatever, it also swings the odds of getting a T2 Stage 2 in your favour. I've already analysed the impact on probabilities it has and its incredible.
Honestly, it really is.
You said it yourself, you've probably never used all 4. So why not switch out 1 for another Luxury Ball? There's no reason not to. 4 is probably a bit much (for Lux) but certainly only running 1 is not an option. I'm thinking 2 is generally best at the moment but obviously I'll test more when it is about to enter our format.
You said it yourself, you've probably never used all 4. So why not switch out 1 for another Luxury Ball? There's no reason not to. 4 is probably a bit much (for Lux) but certainly only running 1 is not an option. I'm thinking 2 is generally best at the moment but obviously I'll test more when it is about to enter our format.
I've already explained why that makes NO sense at all. Running 4 Bebes + anything less than 4 Luxury Ball is a misplay. If its a case of deck space then the viable combinations are as follows:
BEBE - LUX
1 - 3
2 - 2
2 - 3
2 - 4
3 - 2
3 - 3
Running 4 Bebe (you ARENT going to use them, we're assuming, which is almost certainly the case) then there is NO benefit to having additional Bebe over Luxury Ball. None whatsoever. Its like being offered $2 and only taking $1, because the thing you want to buy only costs $1.
If we accept the points that are fundamentally obvious, and don't factor in L.Xs (because obviously that changes your objective), then the case in point is practically scientific fact.
Perfect analogy.That is exactly the same thing as if I were to play 1 Beldum and 4 Metagross as a tech in one of my decks, just because having 4 Metagross would make it much more likely to draw into one.
lolToo bad I took Ryuzaki's advice on this one....