Stephen Carpenter
New Member
Team:
We have two juniors playing in a local weekly tournament. Player A wins the coin-flip, and decides to play first. The players draw their opening hands, and Player B starts playing. She draws a card and attaches an energy to her active Pokémon. At this point, she realizes that Player A was actually supposed to play first, and calls a judge.
The judge investigates and finds that Player B was not intending to cheat (ruling out Unsporting Conduct). When asked why Player B started playing first, she says "Oops, I forgot". Because they are juniors the judge decides not to issue a penalty, as it's a simple mistake.
My question is what to do for a proper fix. If the judge rules to rewind by putting the energy back into Player B's hand and placing a random card from the hand on top of the deck, is this appropriate? If the judge rules that Player B has not gained an advantage from going first (i.e., doesn't get to attack first, etc.), and to continue playing through Player B's turn leaving the game-state as is, is this appropriate?
Why or why not? Is this supported by the documents or common judge practices? Thanks!
- Steve
We have two juniors playing in a local weekly tournament. Player A wins the coin-flip, and decides to play first. The players draw their opening hands, and Player B starts playing. She draws a card and attaches an energy to her active Pokémon. At this point, she realizes that Player A was actually supposed to play first, and calls a judge.
The judge investigates and finds that Player B was not intending to cheat (ruling out Unsporting Conduct). When asked why Player B started playing first, she says "Oops, I forgot". Because they are juniors the judge decides not to issue a penalty, as it's a simple mistake.
My question is what to do for a proper fix. If the judge rules to rewind by putting the energy back into Player B's hand and placing a random card from the hand on top of the deck, is this appropriate? If the judge rules that Player B has not gained an advantage from going first (i.e., doesn't get to attack first, etc.), and to continue playing through Player B's turn leaving the game-state as is, is this appropriate?
Why or why not? Is this supported by the documents or common judge practices? Thanks!
- Steve