Pokémon TCG: Sword and Shield—Brilliant Stars

Suggestion for PTOs: Update round pairings and standings via your website

Status
Not open for further replies.
Only if it fit on a single screen without any scrolling. You would have to shrink the heck out of the fonts.

And sorry, call me cheap if you want, but I'm not shelling out the money for a projector, forget one powerful enough to display as large/bright an image as would be required.

You're assuming I've never tried this... :wink:

You're bent on thinking how it could NOT work rather than trying to imagine how it DOES work :smile:

If you would entertain the thought...

I came in here with a practical and possible solution that would forgo the notion of using an open-web-based medium.

1. Project the results (HDMI to FlatScreen or HDMI Projector onto wall) and also....
2. Tape your Paper Print-outs to the wall anyway.

Two sources = Increased Efficiency.

HOWEVER, you now have a computer projection that serves multiple functions. You can incorporate photos of past round matches, scroll information/announcements onto the screen, and advertise for the venue.

Cut-and-Paste to PowerPoint is your friend :thumb:
 
Wasn't scrolling pairings tried at Worlds one year? Back when the projectors were there and the game clocks were still displayed. I thought I heard that people were complaining that OMG MY NAME ISN'T THERE because they were too impatient to wait for their name to show up.

Granted, I'm not sure if there was also paper copies out. Or maybe I just made the entire thing up. Who knows. x-x

You would need to also weigh the time lost in moving the pairings into PPT vs time gained from having it up. Might it save time? Sure. Would it? I have my doubts.


Also, I'm still not buying a projector. :p
 
Most of the PTO's in Ohio use the scrolling projector method. However, it's not as good as it sounds. In a 200 person tournament, the fact that the software they use sorts by table number makes it hard to find your name.

This also wouldn't work so well in all environments, and still could cause a crowding issue.
 
Awesome thread for so many reasons.

One question I have is what actually constitutes "collecting" information, or whatever the technicalities of COPPA say? If you aren't actually identifying the minor, are you falling under COPPA standards? In other words, writing Ryan V on a website doesn't identify anyone or anything. How many Ryan V's are there? Tons. I have to assume (yes, with all jokes considered) that posting a minor's first name and last initial does not violate COPPA. And, to that extent, where exactly does COPPA protection stop? Does tournament reports on the 'gym with first name/last initial violate COPPA? If not, I can't imagine posting pairings is any different.

I'm very interested in this development as a whole. I'm pretty technically savvy, though not compared to most of you young bucks out there nowadays. I'm curious if there is a simple way to try texts (even if that idea is not being looked at as much as internet). TOM spits pairings out in some form of HTML, making it relatively easy to parse the info. So, could some more technically savvy person write a simple script to parse the parings (maybe even as simple as copying and pasting, don't have TOM in front of me) data (ie, name, table #, etc) into a database. Then, have the database (maybe even a spreadsheet) auto fill pre-entered phone numbers (this will be a pain, but truthfully not that complicated after the first tournament----mind you, I'm thinking something along the lines of a cities marathon), maybe even have them entered into an online database by the player, then have that number pulled off onto your local database/spreedsheet. The idea is to copy the table from pairings, then post into spreadsheet/database and have that autofill the phone number based on name recognition, then have the table number (also extracted from TOM with their name) pushed to their phone. Might be more simple to push them to twitter or even email with a simple mailto function. Its late and I'm rambling...
 
I came in here with a practical and possible solution that would forgo the notion of using an open-web-based medium.



Two sources = Increased Efficiency.

Why do things always have to be in opposition to each other?

Why couldn't you use projection and a web-based medium in conjunction with paper pairings?

If your logic holds, two sources= increased efficiency, so three sources = even more increased efficiency.



Projecting is not a new idea, but hasn't been implemented because of the cost and maintenance of said projectors. I'm not opposed to it at all, but I don't understand why you would even introduce the idea as if it's in opposition to web-based.

You're offering an "alternative" as if an alternative is even needed. IDGI.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top