King Piplup has been incredibly wishy-washy and flip-floppy this game, and could very well have been lynched already if he didn’t claim seer.
True, and I certainly don't deny it. I played pathetically Day 1/2, thats for certain.
Curious, then, that he hasn’t been killed or (judging by the updates) even targeted by the wolves yet. I’ll elaborate more on this in a bit, but first let’s look at some of his posts:
Brightpowder. /story
BrightPowder turned out to be a "bluff". Even if it wasn't, though, it still wouldn't have explained why you weren't targeted by the wolves, only why you weren't killed by the wolves.
OK, I have the item. I was over exxagerating its powers to discourage the wolves from going after me. Explain how this is a bad play?
“No lynch is by far the best thing we can do right now!”
Then we get three posts in a row by PF5, ProHawk and DP, all expressing their dislike of voting No Lynch. And, of course, what does KP follow up with?
“Disregard my last post, guys, No Lynch is obviously a terrible idea!”
“Eh, you know what? I don’t really care about the No Lynch thing anymore. Oh, and I’m not gonna vote. But you should totally vote!”
“Yeah, I got called out on my fence sitting, so I guess I’ll go ahead and post my thoughts. But I’m still not gonna vote!”
Adressing all of these points together below, but FWIW, I'd been playing TCG all day and am lying in bed far too late in a hotel room. Clearly I should've just kept my mouth shut, because I do make myself look like a complete idiot and like I have no idea what I'm doing, as well as looking scummy as possible.
FWIW? That's not worth anything. You can't expect to be cleared of suspicion because you admit to playing scummily.
FWIW, which was nothing. I expected nothing, but lying it is stupid...
“Yeah, I’d be all for lynching Dave today. I’m still not voting, though!”
I'll be honest, I didn't see you making any constructive posts/points against people. With half the 'Gym offline, we needed ideas quickly, and I didn't have anyone. I was basically asking if anyone had any ideas, because if we didn't, Diaz would likely be lynched, and I felt he was town. If you look at past Day 1's, alot of the time the person who makes the radical vote gets lynched. I frankly did NOT want that to be me.
Way to strawman your way out of that argument. Me contributing or not contributing has nothing to do with this. Also, your argument has nothing to do with the post in question:
Quote:
Originally Posted by King Piplup
You have a good point.
At this point, as posted above, my favorite lynch is dave268 (sorry if the numbers are wrong), simply because I think the one post made in his defense should not be enough to get him off the radar.
Posted with Mobile style...
Can't see anything about asking people who to lynch here. You're saying "My favorite lynch is dave628" and then not voting for him. Why?
Again, see my voting fears and etc. It's not good logic, and I seriously regret it and am trying to play better.
“Time to completely disregard PMysterious! Oh, and I feel like voting now. Can you tell me who to vote for, please?”
I'll be honest again, I thought PM was just a total idiot. Clearly I was wrong, but hindsight is 20/20...
“I think Dave’s the best lynch today (still not going to vote for him myself, though, in case people disagree with my vote), but I actually don’t really know why we’re lynching him.”
Again, yep, this makes me look totally stupid and was really illogical.
“Yeah, PM’s a valid lynch, probably the best, but I’m not gonna vote him because I don’t think a lot of others will vote him and then I won’t be on the popular bandwagon. Oh, and since he's the Alpha, I don't really want to vote for him either way.”
Again, more of my "fear of stepping out of line because the vets rule the world here" syndrome. I realize I need to shake that, but that's my (not the greatest) logic.
There's a difference between being careful and scummy. Things that just look odd (erratic vote and opinion hopping, not voting at all even though you've clearly stated suspicions strong enough for casting a legitimate vote) usually fall firmly into the latter category.
Difference maybe, but on here it's a razor thin difference.
"Last-minute chance to control my vote, everyone!"
Not how I meant it, but that is how it reads.
Then how did you mean it? You said "Any last thoughts before I vote Dave?". That gives very clear signals to me that you're attempting to go with the popular opinion and letting yourself be swayed by others, to the point where you're inviting others to basically convince you of the best vote instead of formulating an opinion yourself.
Meant that unless anyone had any better ideas (Seriously, it's Day 1 and I didn't feel as strongly about Dave as I was leading onto) I was going to drop my vote. Crime?
These posts are all from Day 1. Already, he's looking scummy from all the flip-flopping and unwillingness to take an independent stance. Also, his reluctance to consider PM as a valid lynch target for various reasons makes a lot more sense now that he flipped wolf.
You saw my reasoning above.
To summarize-
• I freak about getting lynched early (especially with a seer role), and did not want to be on the wrong side of the vet's ire so early. Clearly all I've done is put suspicion on myself, but that's the logic.
Let's go through some more posts:
This is where he stole an argument from a post two posts above his. He blames it on Tapatalk delaying his post, but that claim is just so incredibly easily fakeable.
It's true. I clearly can't prove this, but I'll go to the developer to see if there's a log on these type of things if you really want proof.
Awesome contradiction right there. Do you want the priest playing a guessing game, or do you want them protecting DP?
Total stupidity. Seriously, that was stupid.
Stupid of you or of me?
Me, but I like how you ignore my last two points.
"OH HEY GUYS, DP IS A POWER ROLE TOWNIE. JUST THOUGHT YOU OUGHT TO KNOW."
Wow, really? Way to be completely anti-town by revealing a power role who wasn't very pressured anyway.
Thought you all would like to know my night activities, since hiding them would be anti-town as you can get.
So then all seers, priests, roleblockers and everyone with a night role has to claim ASAP because "hiding their night activities would be as anti-town as you can get"? Faulty logic.
In case you hadn't noticed, I had already claimed at that point. Faulty logic alright, but not mine.
This post is delicious. It's such a convenient scheme for the wolves! KP, the wolf rolecop, seers someone. The wolves nightkill KP's target, getting rid of a townie AND giving KP credibility by distancing him from the wolves. But the wolves missed one big point: they haven't even targeted KP yet. Why would the wolves kill KP's targets instead of KP himself? Sure, killing a seer's targets prevents his night role from being useful, but killing the seer would accomplish the same thing and more! So logically, the only reason for wolves to do the above would be because they want to keep the seer alive. And when would they want that? When the seer is a wolf, of course!
Wolf/seer? See post on screwed up game. If that's true, then we have serious issues with the game here.
Not as messed up as a 100% protection item…
Do I really have to continue this...? I can't believe that the people accusing me here can't realize I was trying to bluff the wolves. Seriously.
I don’t think you’re Shauntal, KP. There’s been no evidence so far to suggest the Elite 4 being in the game, which means that E4 claims should be taken with exactly as big a grain of salt as non-Pokémon universe name claims.
You'd be wrong. I'm Shauntal, /story. If I was a wolf, would I be stupid enough to claim Shauntal (a Pokemon E4 from the Region the game is based off of, when there are clearly characters from other universes that wouldn't be likely to be countered)
Textbook example.
How is it WIFOM? How stupid would it be to claim someone likely in the game that early if I wasn't that person? Plus Thunderjolt has already semi-confirmed me as Shauntal since the flavor text in our roles match up almost exactly
I’m also interested in your BrightPowder. If it really does protect against everything that can happen to you during the night forever, wouldn’t that be extremely broken? Think what an actual town-aligned seer could do with that thing! They could reveal as soon as they get it, and then essentially ensure a town win! How is that even remotely balanced?
It does offer 100% protection at this point. My theory (since it does only raise evasion in the Video Game) is that the level of protection eventually falls or even completely goes away. It's not unheard of to have items that prevent wolf kill. (See DP Paraisan Intrigue)
It was all a "bluff"!
It really gets frustrating when all you do is attack the Brightpowder issue when I was trying to protect myself from the wolves.
I see a number of you advocating for a “follow the cop” strategy, where we let KP seer the “IDK list” and give us the wolves. However, for a strategy like this to work, we need a confirmed town seer. Which is exactly what KP is NOT. And even if there was a possibility that he is town-aligned, which I don’t see, why would we take the risk? Following a wolf rolecop is a fast and easy way to lose.
Again, I have never even considered a Wolf seer. Ever. It would be ridiculously OP.
To summarize my points against KP:
• Has been posting illogically and scummy
Can't deny it.
• Has not been using his role well (yeah, sure, go ahead and seer Lil_Magma (who didn’t even post that game day) on Night 1 instead of someone who actually took heat like PM or Diaz. Sure, target Redados1 Night 2 instead of someone like desufnoc.)
Wanted to get a read on Napoleon so we didn't have a power player possibly joining the wolves. Same logic with Waynegg replacing Redados1.
• Revealed DP as a power role townie by repeatedly telling the priests to protect him
Perhaps dumb, but in all honesty, it would be more scummy for me to withhold information.
No. No it wouldn't. Revealing DP as a townie power role is incredibly scummy, because it basically screams out to the wolves "Hey guys, killing DP will weaken the town considerably!". You've stated you wanted a priest to protect DP a number of times now, but priesting DP would roleblock him, rendering his power role useless. And by repeatedly stating how much you feel he needs to be priested, you're opening a perfect opportunity for the wolves to get a guaranteed kill - just don't kill DP!
Priests didn't have to protect him, but with the pressure there for them to do it, any smart wolf wouldn't target him.
• Has not been targeted by the wolves yet
Can't honestly speak to why this has happened. The Brightpoweder explains last night (Along with the freeze)
Nope, BrightPowder explains nothing. If you were targeted by the wolves and BrightPowder blocked the kill, then this would be a valid argument.
Maybe the wolves were smart enough to not target me with the threat of 100% immunity? (Even 25% would be risky for a group of wolves that really can't afford to waste a kill if they want to win)
• Claims to have a gamebreaking item that should not exist by any reasonable WW modding standards
Again, see WWX(I?)
• Has a somewhat shady name claim
How? Please elaborate.
We have no evidence of your character being in the game, and IIRC no character with even a slight resemblance to Shauntal has appeared in the updates yet. Evidently at least some (if not all) night roles are shown in the updates - so why no mention of a girl with a Jellicent?
Not all show up, clearly. I believe AT's last game was an exception rather than the standard for updates.
And here’s what I think needs to happen:
• Ideally, we lynch KP today, getting rid of another wolf. If not, then for the love of Arceus at least seer him.
Sounds fun, seer a seer...I welcome it though, if the town has a consensus.
• Ultimatedra, I recommend you challenge KP. Going by KP’s vague description of BrightPowder, it should not protect him from roles during the day. If you challenge him, the resulting update will surely reveal whether or not he’s telling the truth about his claim.
I welcome this also.
• KP, you obviously have a lot to answer. I would specifically like to hear this from you, however: how does your BrightPowder work more specifically, and who gave it to you?
I elaborated more on it above, and it is seriously best for that person to remain anonymous. They have even requested it through a bit of a coded message in their post(s).
• I’ve obviously painted a huge target on my back. So, to my other doctor friend out there (you know who you are), please protect me tonight.
Agreed, the wolves will be on you.
Let’s lynch a wolf today.
VOTE: King Piplup
~Akane
KP:
Did you miss my entire post? Read the parts in purple again. Are you claiming I didn’t refute any of your points?
Actually, I did miss it.
Also, you yet again fail to see what I mean with the BrightPowder. I don’t care about what it actually does – I was talking about your “bluff”. This is your “bluff”:
I've explained this already, but I'll do it again-
- Wanted to discouarge roleblockers/obviously the kill
- I hadn't considered anybody would want to seer me, so it seemed a non-issue. Clearly I was wrong.
All I can see here is you claiming it protects you from ALL night roles. Not just offensive roles, but
everything. So why would you claim it protects you from seers if you just “bluffed” the claim to avoid wolves targeting you?
Pull evidence from 100 posts ago ("Hold up a minute")when reasons above still applied to the bluff. Not very solid reasoning.
~~~
http://wiki.mafiascum.net/index.php?title=Role_Cop
No.
~~~
That’s not nearly enough. We have no evidence (minus your claim) that Hawes is in the game – heck, we don’t even know Lenora’s in the game yet. More proof, please?
Bold/blue...Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think I've caught up on my missed accusations.