You could play it with Blissey pretty well.
Now that I think about it...I like that. I really think the deck needs stage 2 techs tho.
You could play it with Blissey pretty well.
I was going for something like this
20x Pokemon
1x Alakazam*
2x Gible
1x Gabite
2x Garchomp
2x Garchomp Lv X
1x Squirtle
1x Blastoise D
2x Bronzor
2x Brongzong
3x Gardevoir D EX
3x Flygon D EX
23x Trainers
3x Bebes
3x Celios
4x Tvr or Holon Adventurer depending on which pokemon
4x Rare Candy
2x Night Maintence or TSD
4x Quick Ball
2x Windstorm
1x Battle Frontier
17x Energy
8x Grass
7x Fire
2x Multi
just for example but, you could play just about anything in place of Dragonite and Gardevoir. It just depends on what you choose
i challenge ANYONE to make a list with this that isn't clunky.
It'd be better if not for the TONS of Blissey in the format.
Why is everyone saying to tech in stuff like Dragonite ex, Ttar ex and Flygon ex? The ultimate tech would obvoiusly be a Salamence ex PK, so you can finnish off any thing that garchomp cant handle. It would very much be like the Lugia ex tech in Metanite, a really nasty suprize.
Anyone who plays Garchomp needs to play at least five different types of basic Energy cards.
Anyone who plays Garchomp needs to play at least five different types of basic Energy cards.
4, max. you just gotta know the popular decks
exactly should be :lightning :fighting: sychic: :water: -next magmortor
pokemon * are risky with garchomp. Playing stage 2's without their under evolutions is best because you bottleneck yourself a good start (or at least consistant start). Lone Pokemon* starts are more likely then one might think. Besides, no pokemon * is really worth playing when you've got an array of stage 2's to choose from, all of which Chomp X can practically pull out of thin air. And lest we forget, that if not for the blissey in the format, Garchomp would be good by himself.