Pokémon TCG: Sword and Shield—Brilliant Stars

2010-1-5 Ninetales Rumble 3/16

Status
Not open for further replies.
MrMeches

MrMeches

New Member
"Before posting, please review the FAQ and follow the Guidelines provided for Card of they Day. Whereas we enjoy opinions of the cards, it is necessary to include a Brief Description for all players to understand your point of view and an optional Rating (ex. x/10). In the future, posts not using the FAQ information may be deleted and reported. Thanks, Mgmt"


[gal=49512] 2010-1-5 Ninetales Rumble 3/16 [/gal]​
 
3 for 60 is not the greatest if you use doubble color less and expert belt 2 for 80 no discards could be extremely helpful verses beedrill and leafeon. 6/10 can be teched to be good but not the great. Just my 2 cents
 
The Best thing about this card is it's simplicity.

60 for 3 energy.

There are too many weird cards to teach young players with. I say weird, but I think most people know what I mean. Cards that are simple as this are excellent to train with, and undoubtly is the reason it was released with Rumble.

For Rumble itself, I would give it 7/10 for the game.
For TCG limited, I would give it 3/10. 20 damage per energy is out classed these days.
For Training young 5 to 8 year old players, I would give it 8/10. I know that there are players that can handle more, but for all players first starting in TCG, KISS method works much better than more complicated cards and deck.
 
okay....now THAT'S cute!!!!!!!!! :biggrin:

anyway, 60 for 3 energies is not particularly good, but Rumble was released for it's own reasons, and i feel as though it has fulfilled it. this card is very simple. no giant secret strategy to it, just plain straight damage.
 
Almost unplayable in the TCG. Although, it does do well in the actual RUMBLE game.

2.1/10 - Modified
7/10 - In the Pokemon RUMBLE game.
 
Horrible drawing, only 1 move and it's 3 for 60. Very slow and very bad. I don't like any of the Pokemon Rumble cards. 0/10
 
Okay... this is horrible. The only cards that should have x2 weakness are SPs and Lv X's. I'm outraged by the fact that this TCG is going backward and beginning to closely resemble it's first generation as opposed to growing more complex. This card is weak; though I like it's picture. 0/10
 
I agree the card Game is Going Backword's It is getting worse :(
Unseen Forces and Emeral was the Best Time's
the NineTails 3/10
 
Maxwell Sage said:
Okay... this is horrible. The only cards that should have x2 weakness are SPs and Lv X's. I'm outraged by the fact that this TCG is going backward and beginning to closely resemble it's first generation as opposed to growing more complex. This card is weak; though I like it's picture. 0/10
Click to expand...

Better get used to double weakness more now because ALL the cards in HeartGold and SoulSilver have x2 weakness.
 
It looks like Origami, the picture is just dodgy.

3 for 60. . . That's better than Arcanine SV !!!!!11!!1!!11!

And finally weakness x2 to Gyarados and Kingdra. Yep 1/10 for sure lol
 
3 for 60 is underpowered. Water Weakness is bad. 90 HP is OK. But the other Ninetales in the format-MT and soon to be HGSS- are much better. 2/10
 
Sadly, in my opinion, this is the worst Ninetales in the format. I can list each Ninetales that is better than this one right now.

Ninetales MT
Ninetales PL
Ninetales HGSS (the new one by the way; will it be in the next set? Who knows)

Even the Ninetales from the Magmortar battle deck in Japan is better than it too.

Yeah, looks all the other Ninetales in the current modified are better than it.

Well, one attack for a fully evolved Pokemon isn't the best. Sure, later on this year, put DCE and a :fire: energy on it and this can give it a speed boost and do 60 (which is decent damage at least). But really, nothing but one attack? Sorry Ninetales, your artwork may be cute, but you really aren't the best compared to your brothers.

Overall 2/10 in modified

The Ninetales mentioned above are really better than it. Those Ninetales can really help you in certain situations compared to this one.
 
Last edited:
Wow... a rumble CotD? Anyways, onto the card... Ninetales from Rumble has a good 90 hp for a Stage 1, a terrible weakness of x2 to :water:, no resistance (bad!) and a good :colorless: to retreat. Flame Tail, it's only attack, is bad. :fire:colorless:colorless: for only 60 damage? Baaaad.... However, this card could be better by making a combo of Exploud SV to remove weakness, Expert Belt to increase damage and HP, and a DCE to help with the attack cost.

Modified: 3/10
Limited: 0/10 (Limited for rumble?)
Unlimited: 0/10
Rumble: 8/10
 
All the rumble cards are plain terrible plain and simple.
High energy costs to do meager damage, topped off with no supportive ability of any kind.
1/10 for normal tcg
Fad-that-will-die-out-in-a-month-just-you-wait/10 for rumble
 
I'll admit that I'm not that familiar with Pokemon Rumble, so I'm kinda presuming you can use these regularly in the TCG...anyways, Nintales Rumble is...kinda weak. Statwise, 90 HP is average for a Stage 1, x2 Weakness to :water: hurts, no Resistance is common, and :colorless: to Retreat is cheap. Flame Tail is...uninspiring at :fire::colorless::colorless: for a mere 60. Really, there's not only better Ninetales to use, but better cards overall.

Modified - 1/10 (Not worth it, MT one is much better and tech-able)
Limited - 0/10 (Presuming this is some sorta promo thing or within its own set; at any rate, it's not draftable)
Unlimited - 1/10 (No use here)
Rumble - ??/10 (Seriously, no clue how effective this is here)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top