Pokémon TCG: Sword and Shield—Brilliant Stars

2014 Season Updates and Event Dates!!!!!

I am not a fan of Masters paying a fee just from what's revealed so far, makes me want to give up on the TCG entirely instead of bothering to continue. Granted I'm mostly a VGC player since VGC came out since I've always been stronger in the videogames than cards, but yeah...I mean, unless you're like guaranteed a pack for playing, I can take my $5-$10 elsewhere and play my one-time cost videogame and wait to compete in it for free.

Not necessarily saying the younger sort should pay, but considering the Masters are the ones who pay the most outside of random Poke-parent and spoiled kid who probably don't even play the TCG formally, it is a bit of a slap in the face to be charging those same fans who grew the game to play now, as I'm willing to bet like me a lot of those Masters were once Seniors and Juniors too.
 
Not necessarily saying the younger sort should pay, but considering the Masters are the ones who pay the most outside of random Poke-parent and spoiled kid who probably don't even play the TCG formally, it is a bit of a slap in the face to be charging those same fans who grew the game to play now, as I'm willing to bet like me a lot of those Masters were once Seniors and Juniors too.

Like stated before, Seniors and Juniors already have a low turn out. Having them have to pay to play fewer rounds, in some cases one match, will not attract more younger players.
 
For a League Challenge, need a printer, laptop, and TOM. And a judge since the TO cannot judge (unless that gets changed). And room and time. League only runs for 2 hours since that is the only time we can run it. Logistics for this can be very tough. And can regular League be run when the Challenge is going on? I know some Leaguers won't feel like playing in the Challenge and may just want to play at League.
 
For a League Challenge, need a printer, laptop, and TOM. And a judge since the TO cannot judge (unless that gets changed). And room and time. League only runs for 2 hours since that is the only time we can run it. Logistics for this can be very tough. And can regular League be run when the Challenge is going on? I know some Leaguers won't feel like playing in the Challenge and may just want to play at League.

The room and Time will be the deciding factor on most leagues. I have a feeling if not enough leagues have these Battle Roads going on, this is a one year thing. I like the idea, but you brought up a strong case why this plan may fall through
 
And can regular League be run when the Challenge is going on?
A league and a tournament can be run as parallel, separate events. They cannot report each other's attendance. League players who did not play in the tournament can't be on the tournament roster. Tournament players who are not there for league can't be on the league roster.
 
The league season will start mid-late september, but the challenges are at the end of the season, hence October.
Ah, well that really sucks, then. I understand there will be an awkward period with changes like this, but going so long without tournaments really stinks.
 
I am very impressed with the changes being made. I'm pretty blown away, even. More prizes for Masters (the largest division) with entry fees to support them, best of 3 swiss rounds, Top 8 only cut, draws being brought back and more trips and money for consistent strong play. These are all great things. You knew there would be a but, though. 50 minutes for best of 3 in swiss is not exactly sufficient. It might be better than swiss single game, but not by much, if at all. I couldn't imagine having 50 minutes for best of 3 for 15 rounds at U.S. Nationals. The amount of ties would be ridiculous. I'm sure there will be more discussion on this topic later.
 
Some thoughts on the information released about the 2013-2014 season…

1) League Challenge

I have been WAITING for this for YEARS. It makes the road towards becoming a PTO so much easier, allows players the opportunity to play in regularly scheduled tournaments that mean something, and can be done anywhere there’s a League. I love this. Even with the Swiss Only portion, I absolutely love this. Plus, it allows the TOs to run their tournaments their way. If you’ve got the time for 2/3 90 minute rounds and you wanna do it that way? Go right ahead! If you can only fit in the minimum number of 30 minute rounds? That’s good too! Wanna charge and give bigger prizes? If that’s what you wanna do, we’re cool with that! Free tournaments? Why the heck not!?!

The point here is that this is a very, very positive development, and one that I applaud.

2) High Level Tournament Structure

Let’s be clear here. This section is talking ONLY about States, Regionals, and Nationals. Cities will still have the familiar 1-day structure of Swiss+Top8 that we’ve had for a couple of years. In this instance, the 50 minute 2/3 Swiss format is designed to ensure that at least one legitimate game is being played between two players. In my opinion, this is NOT designed to have 3 good games. It’s donk protection, pure and simple. And it works rather well in that regard IMO. 50 minutes is actually LONGER than I thought we’d get if we were to do this ourselves. I was thinking 45 minutes.

Because of the Donk protection, I’m also reasonably cool with the top-8 limitation. I’m not 100% happy with it, as I feel that 2-day events like Regionals and Worlds and 3-day events like US Nationals should allow those that hit a couple of bad matchups into the top cut. The 2014 US National Champion will probably be the luckiest player of the weekend, rather than the absolute best. But, with the 2/3 Swiss, I’m not completely destroyed by this decision. I do hope, however, that TOs, especially at the events that are going to be the largest and most complex (Nationals, Worlds) have their schedules thought out well in advance of the tournament starting. This structure will be much, much more difficult to implement correctly. Even at the States level, I’m thinking there will be quite a few really, really late finishes if TOs decide to go 1 day tournaments.

I’m also hoping that More Swiss Rounds are a major part of the Top-8 restriction. I know that MTG runs something like 13 rounds of Swiss, with a single cut at the end of Day 1 getting rid of all players X-3 or worse, for their largest tournaments. Or something like that. It’d be AMAZING to see Pokemon run something like that for Nationals (and possibly Regionals). Day 1, 8 rounds Swiss, out by 7pm. Day 2, cut the X-3s, 5 more rounds of Swiss, then T8 and maybe T4 depending on timing restrictions. Day 3, Finals of all age groups.

All this being said, I HATE Ties. HATE them. It allows players to manipulate the tournament by NOT PLAYING THE GAME. And that is IMO insane. The winner of the tournament should be decided at the table. It drives me nuts when players sit down for their final match, and 16 slips come back in 30 seconds, all with “Draw” marked. I want my players to, y’know, actually PLAY the game of Pokemon. I have never liked the idea of a tie in Pokemon, and I probably never will. Tournaments should be decided at the table, not by manipulating the tournament itself.

I’m really, really looking forward to the new tournament rules. Hoping those go up quickly so that planning can commence on the larger tournaments.

3) VGC

If anybody expected XY to be legal at Autumn Regionals, they were deluding themselves. If anybody expected BW2 to be legal AFTER Autumn Regionals, they were deluding themselves. This is an expected change.

4) Entry Fees

I’m reserving judgment on this until I see exactly what the fees are going to look like and what the prize structure is going to look like with the fees. If the prize structure justifies the cost, then I’m happy with it. If not, then I’m not. Also, happy to see that the J/S tournaments will still all be free, at least at the City level and above.

5) Prize Structure

Well, whaddya know? Some questions answered immediately! They say that the prize support in Masters will increase, but they don’t say what that prize structure is going to look like. I’d like to see the tournament-level prize structure before I completely make a thought on this.

However, the Travel Award and Stipend to be based on CP rankings going into Nationals? ME GUSTA MUCHO!!!!! It’s always been rather pathetic to me how few of the truly great players end up going to Nationals because they can’t afford it. If a player can hit the Top 100, there would almost be no reason NOT to go to Nationals! Even at $300, that pretty much covers a plane ticket from most of the country to Indianapolis. You’d be paying for food wherever you go. And you can split the hotel amongst a few players to make the weekend pretty manageable. My weekend at Nationals this year cost me about $500, and I really didn’t need to spend about $100 of that cuz I carried on more than I needed. True, I live in Minneapolis right now, and that’s reasonably close to Indy. But still, that $300 will probably cover somebody’s entire trip (and then some, for some people I know).

Also, it looks like the Awards and Stipends will happen across all 3 age groups. So that’s an extra (roughly) $124650 IN JUST TRAVEL STIPENDS!!! I’m not even looking at the Travel Awards yet!

And that’s just for the TCG! The VGC is getting similar Nationals support, though it doesn’t go as deep as the TCG support. Do ya know what this means? More VGC players at Nationals! AND more VGC players IN GENERAL!

About the only (minor) gripe that I have here is that players that top at Worlds get a MASSIVE head start and are probably going to get the 1-16 Nationals Travel Award quite easily. And I’m not sure if that’s a gripe, really. But that World Championship prize just got a HELLUVA lot bigger for US players.

I absolutely LOVE this change for US Nationals.

6) Player Rewards Program going away

It was a bit of a hassle to administer anyway. If this is going away to pay for the prizes above, then it’s a wonderful tradeoff. While I’m sad to see this go, what’s replacing it is so much better that I’m not really unhappy.

7) Professor Program

This is the part that has the least definition, but the most potential impact. We need more information on this before I can make a reasonable assessment about how this is working.

8) CP Structure

There is literally no change here, though we don’t know what the Worlds Qualifying CP amount will be. I hope they don’t go back to “top 40” and instead stick with a flat line.

Anybody else find it strange that P!Ps are still being talked about even though there is no more Player Rewards Program? Maybe this has something to do with Nationals Qualification or something…

BTW, it’s nice to see that South Africa is finally getting their support. I’ve been watching them from afar (being from RSA myself), and they appear to have a wonderful LD with great Leagues and Tournaments. This has been a LONG time coming for those guys.

9) Season Schedule

OK, this is where I think TPCi goofed a bit. While I LOVE having the League Challenges taking place throughout the year, I fear that some of them will overlap with all of the new tournaments going on.

First things first. NINE DATES FOR REGIONALS?!? That’s obscene. It’ll turn Pokemon into a game of endurance and money, rather than skill and luck. I hope TPCi changes back to 3 Regional dates next year. I don’t want to have to fly out for a tournament 14 weekends a year (15 if you include the Marathon).

The City Championship season seems, well, rather short. IDK why, it’s pretty much exactly the same length it’s always been. But, now that there’s really nothing going on in the Fall or late Spring times, that length of high-level tournaments seems rather, well, short. Also, what happens to Leagues when they can’t run their League Challenge because there’s a City Championship happening in the same town on the same day as their League? Can the LL/LO delay or accelerate their LC based on the dates their PTO gives them? Or can Cities now be run more easily from the TO level, without having to get the PTO involved?

I do like that US Nationals already has a date and a location. It’ll make planning SO much easier and faster. I can already request my time off from work. This is a massive improvement from the last few years, when we didn’t know when and where Nationals was until halfway through the tournament season. Also, nice to know when Worlds will be, even if we don’t know EXACTLY where it’ll be. Still, I can now request time off with CONFIDENCE!

10) Conclusion

I’m reasonably happy with the changes being made for this year. There are a LOT of questions that have yet to be answered, but I feel as though this will be a positive step for both the game and the community.
 
About the only (minor) gripe that I have here is that players that top at Worlds get a MASSIVE head start and are probably going to get the 1-16 Nationals Travel Award quite easily.

I think that they statement about CPs from World's not being counted until after Spring Regionals will take care of this. They'll give Travel Awards/Stipends to the top for their performance in the 2013-2014 season, while still giving folks who did well in Worlds a chance to qualify for the next one. I like this too!
 
I think that they statement about CPs from World's not being counted until after Spring Regionals will take care of this. They'll give Travel Awards/Stipends to the top for their performance in the 2013-2014 season, while still giving folks who did well in Worlds a chance to qualify for the next one. I like this too!

Hmmm... I didn't see that anywhere. Where'd you find it?
 
Hmmm... I didn't see that anywhere. Where'd you find it?

It's right on their page of announcing all the changes.

Changes to Tournament Prize Structure

Play! Pokémon will be increasing prize support in the TCG Masters Division to coincide with the change to entry fees. Masters Division booster pack prizes will be increased at City Championships level and above, and prizes will be given to more players lower in the finish order. Four additional World Championships Travel Awards will also be added to the U.S. National Championships Masters Division. On top of that, Tournament Organizers may choose to award additional prizes to one or more age divisions. Be sure to check the tournament listings for details!

Also new for 2014, U.S. National Championships Travel Awards and Travel Stipends will now be awarded to the top TCG performers in the season’s Championship Point rankings. Travel Awards and Travel Stipends will be awarded as follows, based on Championship Point rankings at the end of Spring Regionals:

Championship Points earned at the 2013 World Championships will not be factored into the rankings until after the U.S. National Championships.
 
A league and a tournament can be run as parallel, separate events. They cannot report each other's attendance. League players who did not play in the tournament can't be on the tournament roster. Tournament players who are not there for league can't be on the league roster.

I thought that was changed to be no League during an event. I used to do a tourney at Disposable Heroes during League but stopped when this became a rule.

I will also miss Player Rewards - it was my hook to get people to sign up for a Trainer Club account. Hopefully something like a Badge Case will be offered so i can use that as the hook.
 
I will also miss Player Rewards - it was my hook to get people to sign up for a Trainer Club account. Hopefully something like a Badge Case will be offered so i can use that as the hook.

Did you not attend this season's league/run? We just had badge cases. Thanks to them, my league went from 15% to 95% ID's activated. Hopefully they continue having these as they were really cool.
 
The thing that kinda weirds me out though is that Masters pay attendance for all premier events, but only Cities and above get better booster prize support.

What's going to happen with League Challenges then? Are they not going to be considered premier events, or is there going to be a fee that doesn't go to prize support, or is there going to be different prize support than boosters, or was this an oversight in the wording?

Right now I'm kinda cautious about this, there's a lot of changes, and I'm not sure how it will work in practice, especially with Battle Roads now being pushed onto leagues that sometimes can't seem to even run monthly tournies easily (the ones around here are run by store employees, and they often get called away to help at the register, and I can't see that being good for a premier event tournament).

The good thing though is that Battle Roads won't be lumped to where one metagame dominates the fall/spring tournaments, but it'll kinda suck if you have a hot streak with your deck and it cools off when the game shifts after the next set.

Also, there's been rumors that LO's have been telling their members yesterday and today that only players that (semi)-regularly attend league can compete in the League Challenge events. Is this just an assumption/way to drive up attendance, or have LO's been told this explicitly?
 
I agree with Bilbo Baggins. As fun as it is to come home and see something that is not a bill addressed to you--and kids love getting mail--Player Rewards were ineffective to get players to activate/link their accounts and were not any kind of motivator to attend leagues and tournaments. They were great when OP started but fell into an afterthought that must have become very demanding on OP because of how late are getting sent out. Hopefully the funds get used for more items similar to the badge case for league :cool:
 
Last edited:
The thing that kinda weirds me out though is that Masters pay attendance for all premier events, but only Cities and above get better booster prize support.

What's going to happen with League Challenges then? Are they not going to be considered premier events, or is there going to be a fee that doesn't go to prize support, or is there going to be different prize support than boosters, or was this an oversight in the wording?

Right now I'm kinda cautious about this, there's a lot of changes, and I'm not sure how it will work in practice, especially with Battle Roads now being pushed onto leagues that sometimes can't seem to even run monthly tournies easily (the ones around here are run by store employees, and they often get called away to help at the register, and I can't see that being good for a premier event tournament).

The good thing though is that Battle Roads won't be lumped to where one metagame dominates the fall/spring tournaments, but it'll kinda suck if you have a hot streak with your deck and it cools off when the game shifts after the next set.

Also, there's been rumors that LO's have been telling their members yesterday and today that only players that (semi)-regularly attend league can compete in the League Challenge events. Is this just an assumption/way to drive up attendance, or have LO's been told this explicitly?
League Challenges are Premiere Events in that they give out CP. The circuit has about $15,000 more in travel stipends than last season for Masters. I assumed that's what the increased prize support was about. Any more would be nice but I think the Top 100 in CP getting travel stipends + an additional 4 for Worlds is pretty good already.
 
Also, there's been rumors that LO's have been telling their members yesterday and today that only players that (semi)-regularly attend league can compete in the League Challenge events. Is this just an assumption/way to drive up attendance, or have LO's been told this explicitly?
League leaders were not told to only allow league players to play in LCs. They could do it but it doesn't sound like TPCi wants to see that happen. It is instead suggested that league leaders offer benefits to regular league players, such as priority seating, as an incentive for players who are there for the tournament to attend league regularly.
 
So how many points do you need to get stuff from Play?

Just curious if I will even get anything.

Anyhow, as for the changes:

As a more casual player (who is Master age) I really can't see the new entry fee thing helping the game.
Since League is usually practice for upcoming tournaments, that means I might start having to face rather nasty decks.

This is quickly turning into a similar situation (IMO) to the time during the end of Platinum where those "donk" decks were so popular (at least it seemed that way).
I almost quit the game because of those (seriously what was fun about playing those decks if you won in like 5 minutes & had to sit around for the rest of the round?)

Not really sure yet, but kinda considering not bothering after the next set is out.
Though I was kinda interested in the Worlds location next year (Haven't been to DC in a long time).
However with the possible rather hostile environment to try to get there, not sure if I want to bother.

I predict there will be even more net decking, possible cheating, and just general bad experiences.
Plus lots of people who can't afford the "best" cards will get shafted.
Thus making "Mr. Suitcase" even more likely to win.
 
Back
Top