Pokémon TCG: Sword and Shield—Brilliant Stars

Boring is Better Volume 2

Status
Not open for further replies.

ChaosJim

Member
I think that Chuck's thread about a year ago, titled "Boring is Better" is still very relevant.

For those of you who don't know what I'm talking about, see this thread:
http://pokegym.net/forums/showthread.php?t=106460

Boring is still better. Using the consistent attackers are really important. Turning your Blissey dark with Weavile so your Darkrai X can double the damage he deals isn't cutting it. Scizor Cherrim wasn't good. Dialga X (not Dialga G X) with double-poison wasn't good. Deafen is good. Flash Impact is good. Shadow Skip is good. Darkness Grace is good.

Kibbles: SP doesn't kill this theory because it plays techs (like Crobat or Lucario). They're just a means to an end. Kingdra played other cards that let it achieve its core competency in specific situations that it otherwise might not be able to.

I'll quote the original post:
It's been a while since I've posted a strategy article on the Gym, but you guys have tilted me enough with all the overzealous (Machamp!) comments on every single Level X posted on the main page where I feel like speaking up. So here we go. For all you youngins looking to win your first Battleroad next year, here are 4 words of advice:

BORING CAN BE BETTER

That's right folks. A lot of the best cards in the GAME are boring. Uxie? Only 20 damage? BORING, but it goes in every deck. Claydol? No way, he only does 40 and makes me get rid of cards, that's horrible, but it's also one of the most amazing cards every printed. Most of those awesome shiny Lv. Xs you pull from your Pokemon packs are useless. Sure, If I have a hot date I'll bust out the Charizard x/Heatran x/Mesprit x massive damage deck to impress her enough where she'll give me the good night kiss, but if I'm playing a real game in a real tournament, I'm going to be playing the same old boring solid consistent thing I've played all year.

Let's look at this year for example. I top cutted States, Regionals, and Nationals on my way to 9th in Masters using 1 attack every game: Kingdra's Dragon Pump. That's IT. No tech level x's, no big 700 damage Legendary Pokemon, just one stupid boring 60/20 attack every turn, every game. Why you ask? Because it wins! Sure, it's not pretty, but it puts food on the table for the Mrs. and keeps the kids in school and out of trouble. Where are the cool kids with the massive over 9000! damage combo decks? Probably dead or in jail.

How about last year? Anyone here remember how last years Worlds top cut games went? Let me refresh your memory:

Psylock
Psylock
Psylock
Psylock
Psylock
Psylock

Lame old Gardy using his dumb 60 damage attack, over and over and over.

The best Pokemon are the Pokemon with the most efficient attacks. It seems simple, but a lot of people miss this concept. Kingdra's ability to do 80 damage every turn for 1 Energy has never been seen before, and is almost impossible to keep pace with. Gardy's ability to shut off Pokemon Powers every turn devastates almost every deck out there, stopping them from setting up completely. The massive damage discard attacks really don't do much other than get a few knockouts and then lose to the solid, consistent attacks. Remember, your big level X has to knock out SIX things, not one. Are you really going to be able to use that 5 energy attack SIX times in a game? Probably not.

At this point Little Timmy might be saying to himself, "You're stupid Chuck! My deck has 1 of EVERY level x, and it hasn't lost a single game to my buddy Jimmy this year". Sorry Timmy, but the fact of the matter is Jimmy's a moron and probably smells a little too. If you base your results off of the local neighborhood competition, you're going to be HEARTBROKEN when you finally hop into a real tournament and get your you-know-what handed to you-know-who.

We're going to flash back to a TRUE story about yours truly about 10 years ago. I just started getting into the Pokemon TCG with my brother and my neighbor Tony. My brother had a Venusaur/Beedrill deck, Tony had a Poliwrath/Magneton deck, and I had a Machamp/Ninetales/Starmie deck. Whenever we played, I would always use my clever tactics to get out all my mega damage Pokemon before they did and pound them into submission. After enough victories I decided I was going to play a tournament at my local comic book shop. I double checked to make sure I had at least 10 holo's in my deck (holos are the best, they have to be, that's why they're so hard to get), bought some new sleeves, and bam, I was good to go.

Round 1 I played against some kid by the name of Jason Klaczynski. Jason had very feminine features and a somewhat stupid looking hat on. He also walked really goofy and his eyes were really close together. Noting all these things, I thought I had this game in the bag. So we flip over our Pokemon. I have a Machop and a Staryu, he has a Hitmonchan. He procedes to play all these boring trainers like Oak, Energy Removal and Computer Search and beats me pretty quickly using only jab. My first thought was "whatever he wont live past 20". My 2nd thought was "hmm, those trainer cards are really good, maybe I should play those too".

Eventually I got to talking strategy with Jason. He told me about how his first deck was some Venusaur/Gyarados thing, but he learned pretty quickly that the "fun" cards didn't cut it in real games. 10 years later his eyes are further apart, he walks slightly more normal, and he's 2 time World Champion, all because he went with boring.

In conclusion, I ask that every time a new level x is shown on the main page, please don't just go nuts and say the card is the future of Pokemon and your combo deck is going to be unstopable. Sit back, take a breath, put on some music, take a nap, eat a bagel, do some situps, and then REALLY look at the card. Try to figure out if it's actually good, or just another big bright sparkly Benedict Arnold trying to lead you right where the Redcoats want you. The inverse applys too! If you see some stupid non-foil Pokemon you hate, don't just dismiss it as plain and uninteresting. It could be something really good, like Claydol or Uxie. Boring can be Better!

-BigChuck01

Thanks to Kibbles and Bits for bringing it back:
Hey Chuck i have a question, how does boring can be better fit into todays format? Now people are winning with complicated SP decks like Luxchomp, and Luxape. None of them are boring or simple like kingdra, so less than a year later has "Boring Can Be Better" been killed by SP decks?
 
Cursegar is pretty simple - Use its attack, doing 60 or 80 with an expert belt, and switch it back to the bench for a Spiritomb or something. Simple yet probably one of the top 2-3 decks out there right now.
 
This will always apply to the top tier decks. Anything that a lot of people play is going to have consistent, reliable damage that is easy to accomplish. That's what wins consistently. Any old rogue can pull of a neat combo against a consistent damage deck, but it's not going to be able to do it for 8 games in a row. If it does, don't tell anyone your deck and go win worlds.
 
it says boring can be better, not must be better. or that better must be boring. even if SP isnt seen as "boring", it doesn't hurt the original argument.
 
hmm. i could throw HoPe into this argument xD. but yes USUALLY simple is better. but i thnk complex is in general more fun, even if you have to have a lot more skill (IMO) to play it right.
 
hmm. i could throw HoPe into this argument xD. but yes USUALLY simple is better. but i thnk complex is in general more fun, even if you have to have a lot more skill (IMO) to play it right.

lulz, the point of that article is not "hey guiz lets play boring decks" it "hey guiz play what win even if you find it boring" its clear that you guys were just quick to suck up to chuck, and completly ingoned the point.(most of you)
 
Actually, Cursegar is more complex than the decks we saw in the last years. Yea, it has a low damage output, but it can move damage counters around and has a lot of other tricks. I don't think that's "boring".

For SP decks, I don't like them because they break the game concept of the Pokémon TCG. However, they have a lot of strategy involved. Again, low damage output, but not "boring" in the way of using only one attack.

So let's see what other decks we have in the metagame. Flygon? A simple mainhitter, but the decks lives because of its techs. Gardevoir? Yea, a match can go with Plox, Plox, Plox, but it doesn't have to go that way. Gardevoir also has a lot of techs and other tricks.

For the really boring decks... Gyarados - that's indeed one of the most simple things, yet a good deck, however not the best. In this case maybe Chuck's thread still applies. Donphan - this is even more simple and has autowin to SP/Luxchomp it isn't even funny any more (yea I was shocked yesterday when I saw how the matchup really is), but it loses to probably everthing else in the format. Jumpluff - looks nice, but didn't see much play for this in masters, probably because Gyarados is just more effective.

Personally, I don't like "boring" decks and still won big tournaments every year. However, sometimes you really can't play what you want to. Back in 2008, I got my Togechomp deck, and my friend complained about how stupid this is because its only beatdown. I told him, this is the only decks besides Gardevoir and Magmortar that can win. I could either play meta or this one. Sadly, that was the truth, there weren't many options back in those days. But as long as I have the option, I choose the decks that make me think and therefor are more fun to play for me. As long as they have a decent chance at tournaments, I'll prefer them before stuff like Gyarados or Kingdra at any time.
 
I'm not going to claim I know everything or anything because I still have a lot to learn but it seems 'Boring is Better' is only partially true.

I'm not going to argue "OH THIS DECK IS NOT BORING! LOOK I HAVE A POKE-POWER I USE IT IS A STRATEGY HAHA I AM SO CLEVER" or anything, because that's still the kind of deck [both of] the OP are talking about. Ask yourself; is this deck consistent? Does this deck set up and pull off a reasonable and powerful strategy? If so, that is what we are considering a 'boring deck'.

I think the only thing I would like to say is that you have to BUILD on the boringness. You have to add something to seperate you from all the other decks doing the exact same thing. This is the example always cited, but I am lazy, so I will cite it again anyways. Speedrill was a popular deck; very consistent, 'boring'. The build that won worlds however included Luxray GL Lv. X which wasn't exactly the norm for the build at the time. It's not a groundbreaking addition; people knew Luxray GL Lv. X was a great card, but it was unconventional.

So I agree with this advice but also add that you have to be willing to think outside the box. Don't JUST use the boring deck, use it with your own flavor.

EDIT: Looking at that thread, it's kind of funny what people say about Uxie; that it's 'overpowered'. Not so overpowered when everyone gets one free from league, right? Haha.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top