Pokémon TCG: Sword and Shield—Brilliant Stars

BRs - No top cut - how do we feel now?

Status
Not open for further replies.
So with the tourneys getting so big now do you think Cities will also have the winner determined by swiss play?

No.

Stop fearmongering, pleeeease. -_-

Also, not having top cut at BRs along with the deeper CP distribution = awesome. I have no gripes whatsoever. A quick splash of 5 rounds of Pokemon is exactly enough for me right now.
 
The only real issue I have with it now is that losing in the first two rounds ruins your chances of a top ranking completely.

Saturday at Winter Park FL I went 5-1, losing only the first round, and finished 6th.
 
No top cut is bad. It adds variance, which is never good for the game. Playing 6 games without getting a bad hand is unlucky. So basically, you have to get lucky to win a battle road

I got news for you. You have to get lucky to win any tournament and always have.

No top cut was expected to shorten the events so that it would wrap up at a reasonable time, not to reduce attendance. This goal was certainly achieved.

As far as not being important, BRs with a BFL of 6 can potentially account for 22.5% of the target, so they are a big deal in aggregate. This is about the same as last year, so the importance of the events has been unchanged, roughly.
 
The only real issue I have with it now is that losing in the first two rounds ruins your chances of a top ranking completely.

Saturday at Winter Park FL I went 5-1, losing only the first round, and finished 6th.

Wait what division were you? I got 6th place at winterpark florida also. Im in seniors
 
Why not drop the top cut from cities? They're about the same size, and held at most of the same locations - so the time constraints are the same. If it's good enough for BRs, why not Cities?
 
To my memory, CCs are generally quite a bit larger than BRs (though we have had very large BRs so far this season). Some are at different venues as well.

The deeper CP cut and greater competitive significance is all the evidence I really need though.
 
To my memory, CCs are generally quite a bit larger than BRs (though we have had very large BRs so far this season). Some are at different venues as well.

The deeper CP cut and greater competitive significance is all the evidence I really need though.

I'm not sure I understand what you mean by the second part, but wouldn't the increased attendance put even more of a time constraint on venues?
 
We had 35 masters for Edmonton's first Battle Road.

Ended up with five players sitting with a 5-1 record.
 
Why not drop the top cut from cities? They're about the same size, and held at most of the same locations - so the time constraints are the same. If it's good enough for BRs, why not Cities?

Considering that cities are worth more points than BRs then if one of them were to drop top cuts then I'd rather them drop them from BRs than cities. More points means that there is more on the line, so I'm sure a lot more players would appreciate top cuts at city championships, myself included.
 
I'm not sure I understand what you mean by the second part, but wouldn't the increased attendance put even more of a time constraint on venues?

Probably yes. No disagreement there.

The second part of my statement, rephrased: because they are offering more CP at City Championships, and because of the greater accomplishment and importance that they represent, it's likely that they will remain significant enough to warrant a top cut. Since the minimum cut size used to large enough to actually noticeably change the results of Swiss (where BRs often ended up being rematches from Swiss in the finals anyway), it's been more respected and a 'bigger deal'.

...I dunno where I'm going with it anymore. Hopefully it made some sense.
 
Why not drop the top cut from cities? They're about the same size, and held at most of the same locations - so the time constraints are the same. If it's good enough for BRs, why not Cities?

Aren't TOs compensated more for Cities, which makes it worth holding a tournament of this size? BRs were not this large until last year.
 
No.

Stop fearmongering, pleeeease. -_-

Also, not having top cut at BRs along with the deeper CP distribution = awesome. I have no gripes whatsoever. A quick splash of 5 rounds of Pokemon is exactly enough for me right now.

I am not fear mongering. I am just saying of no top cut is proving to be very successful at Battle Roads then why would it not be expanded latter It seems that Pokemon is getting too popular now and venues are not able to hold enough space for all of the players that want to play. We had a BR in the Seattle Area that had 72 players for a Battle Road and others even more. The venues that hold BR's are for the most part the same that hold Cities and face the same Challenges. It is the States and regionals facilities that can truely accomodate enough players for a top cut. From all I have heard the no top Cut battle Roads were all huge successes and I have no reason to to believe that. I am not wishing for Cities to loose top cuts but the growth of the game my be forcing that issue latter. I can see the day where Top Cuts will only be held at top level events like States and regionals. I thought getting rid of top cuts would hurt attendance at Battle Roads but I was clearly mistaken. So I do not thing there being gone is such a bad thing after all. I am not afraid to admit when I was wrong and I was wrong about Top Cuts elimination being bad for the game. You cant argue so with the attendance numbers that were experianced this past weekend.


I will say that not a Top cut is definalty better then the alternative of sudden death where you loose and you are done playing for the day like the Last Chance Qualifiers is run. I hope Pokememon never has to adopt that as Yu-gi-oh has.
 
Last edited:
I think since the CP points for 1st - 4th are good people may be happy now.
Anyway it still seems like the same old, you have to do x-1 to make t4 anyway, and you can easily miss it with a percentage.
 
Last edited:
I think no top cut is working fine. 1st gets 15 points and 4th gets 10, that's not much difference in points. Why spend 2-3 hours just to juggle the standings a little? At the battle roads I went to last weekend there were five players at 5-1. Last year the unlucky player to get 5th would have walked away with nothing while the other players get a chance to play top cut. This year he still gets 6 CP.

Also I think it was nice being done around 5pm instead of having to play until 8 or 9 for a measly 4 packs and 15cp. The prizes for battle roads are small and don't warrant a long, grueling day.
 
Last edited:
Here in Watervilet, NY we had our largest attendance yet for an event 58 players for Battle Roads. Was the larger turnout because of no Top Cut? Only time will tell. But it appears this game is the biggest I have seen in years and that is a good thing!!
 
Here in Watervilet, NY we had our largest attendance yet for an event 58 players for Battle Roads. Was the larger turnout because of no Top Cut? Only time will tell. But it appears this game is the biggest I have seen in years and that is a good thing!!

Yes I will have to agree the new Pokemon Season has started out with a bang. I am very glad both of our events are doubled up at the same time as annother battle road in the area, otherwise I do not know if my venues could hold everyone and I hate having to turn players away,
 
Here in Watervilet, NY we had our largest attendance yet for an event 58 players for Battle Roads. Was the larger turnout because of no Top Cut? Only time will tell. But it appears this game is the biggest I have seen in years and that is a good thing!!

Your larger attendance was due to the large roll CPs play in invites....I promise you no top cut did not encourage people to come to your events.
 
There was one with 108 Masters.

108 Masters.

Holy McGyver. There were American SPTs with less TOTAL attendance than that.

I played in this BR. After 7 rounds of swiss, you're pretty much done with pokemon for the day considering the differences in 1st and 4th place is only 5 points (what equates to about half a point in the old system).

In addition, With the new point system in play I'm 100% okay with having no top cuts at BRs, especially since you can even earn points when you place outside of top 4, which is very nice. Last year, if you bubbled at 5th, you would be walking away with nothing. You still need the necessary records to make top cut LAST year, so removing top cut makes zero difference on the type of record you need to have to earn points at a BR. If anything, there's more incentive now than ever to stay in with an x-2 record at BRs, since there's still a good chance you can earn points for your performance.
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheRolesWePlay
@Psychup
We get it you're upset. Now please just let the topic end. We have the information, and the powers that be have apologized for it taking so long, so stop beating the proverbial dead horse.



I will remind everyone that that reasoning came from someone quoting the Pokemon website's blurb on BRs in general.

I don't personally see them removing top cut from Cities however since there is more on the line as opposed to a 5 CP difference, 2 packs, and a gimmicky card.


Be honest, Before the announcement came about this seasons Battle roads did you ever imagine for a second that they would remove top cuts from a Premiere Event?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top