I had a thought, as a result of getting a couple of questions wrong on the Professor Test. When I saw which questions I got wrong I kicked myself because I felt pretty strongly that if I was actually looking at the card, which would be the case in a real judging situation, I would have got the question right.
So my thought was - what if there were card scans, or at least links to the card scans, embedded in the professor test? I think the test would better represent an actual judging situation. What do others think?
Yes I know that I could skip back and forth between the test and the researching tower looking at the cards, but that adds extra time in a timed test. I also know that the relevant text is provided in the test. I guess the main point is that in a real situation you have the whole card there. For me, that provides more and better "information" than just reading the text.
This is not sour grapes, merely an idea about how the test might be made better.
So my thought was - what if there were card scans, or at least links to the card scans, embedded in the professor test? I think the test would better represent an actual judging situation. What do others think?
Yes I know that I could skip back and forth between the test and the researching tower looking at the cards, but that adds extra time in a timed test. I also know that the relevant text is provided in the test. I guess the main point is that in a real situation you have the whole card there. For me, that provides more and better "information" than just reading the text.
This is not sour grapes, merely an idea about how the test might be made better.
Last edited: