Please bear in mind I am not trying to be cruel in any way with what I'm posting here. I'm just being 100% honest.
This article shouldn't be on the front page.
Your deck list
This is a poorly constructed deck list. 3-2 Donphan Prime? Sudowoodo? 4 Expert Belt? 4 Prof. Elm's and no Bebe's/Poke Comm./Lux Ball? PokeRadar?
16 fighting energy?
Your deck list needs tightening up - at the moment it's clunky and not consistent. And some of the card choices are just mediocre. Why would you possibly play Prof. Elm when you can run Bebe's which can also net you a basic? You miss out basic things like Bebe's, Lux Ball, Poke Comm., Rare Candy, Palmer's (you run NO recovery) etc. Why do you need 4 Expert Belt? Why run Radar when you can run more effective search?
Poke-Radar-Legends Awakened
This card is mostly a filler but it can be useful because you can look at the top 5 cards of your deck and choose any pokemon you find there and put them into your hand.
You should not be running any "filler" cards. Every card in your deck should have a purpose.
Sudowoodo-Unleashed
This card is in this deck because not only is it brutal because of its push over, that does 20x tthe number of energy attached to it, but also since it has 90 HP, it's a great card for taking hits on your bench, without it being knocked out so easily.
I don't see your reasoning for Sudowoodo. It has 90 HP? Great. Now watch me 1-shot it with a Dragon Rush + Flash Bite. "...it's a great card for taking hits on your bench, without it being knocked out so easily.". I don't see your reasoning here at all.
Phanpy-HGSS:
This phanpy is very useful not only for the fact that it evolves into Donphan Prime, but its flail is extremely fun when you have an expert belt attached to it and have damage counters on it. With flail and having an expert belt on it you can do up to 100 damage . . . with a phanpy!
How often are you going to use Flail? What is the use of saying that? If your opponent sees a Phanpy with an Expert Belt attached, they're most likely just going to 1-shot it and grab 2 prizes very easily (only 90 damage needed for 2 prizes?)
Expert Belt(=D)-Arceus
This is one of the mmooossstttt important cards in this deck out of all the T:S:S! This card allows you to do 20 more damage and get +20 HP to your pokemon that you attach it to. Now, this only disadvantage to this card is that when that pokemon is knocked out, your opponent takes one more prize card. this card works with every pokemon in this deck so well.
Explain why you run 4. It's not that important that you need to waste 4 deck spaces + a DSG. It's not like you're going to be using Belt to donk.
There are a lot of other things I could pick out in the decklist, but the biggest one has to be the 16 fighting energy.
16 fighting energy?
...
Explain exactly why you need 16 fighting energy.
Matchups
Biggest 3 decks atm:
- LuxChomp
- VileGar
- Gyarados
...so why aren't these listed in the matchup section? Ok, you have GyaraPlume (which seems like a very much inferior version of SpeedDos, PloxDos, straight dos or dos w/DGX - how are you planning on playing any of the trainers which are crucial in Gyara (Junk Arm, Pokemon Rescue etc.).
Charizard Deck:
This match is quite interesting. When I was battling this deck, it really depends on the set-up that your opponent gets, and also what you get. Like, an example would be that when I was playing this deck, the person playing the charizard deck got a really good hand, but only a vulpix as his basic. Now on my side, I was able to phanpy-Broken Time Space-donphan-e-belt- energy all in one tur and donk him. But, another game with him, he pulled a great set-up and was able to donk me even when I got a really good hand. So, against a charizard deck, it really depends on the set-up on each side.
Okay, so you've explained that in the Charizard matchup it depends on the set-up on each side but you haven't gone into any detail about how to win the matchup? The only way to win you've described here is a straight donk. And he donked you straight back. You've given us virtually no information on how to play the matchup. And also, Charizard is barely played any more because of Gyarados.
GyraPlume:
This deck. . .oh this deck. When I was playing against this deck, it was brutal. I got an amazing set-up and everything. But, this deck just kept on swiping my pokemon! I couldn't belt at all because of the Plume, he got out the Plume super fast using a spiritomb, and did up to 90 damage every turn with his gyrados. So, in the end, against this deck. . . you would need a REALLY good set-up and them a bad set-up in order to win.
I've already talked about this.
KingGatr:
This is a deck that my mom made herself(yes my mom plays pokemon) and so against this deck, I would say I won brutally. I always got fantastic set-ups, she would take a few prizes here andd there, but mostly it was an utter donk.
What kind of experience does your mum have with playing the game? Is she a competent player? Has she top cut in a tournament before? Have YOU top cut in a tournament before? I don't like basing things on credentials, but from what I can see based on this deck list you aren't a competent player and should not be posting a front page article. If a new player comes on here, he/she expects to see front page articles with quality lists, written by quality players, with quality explanations and quality matchups. So far you've provided none of that. And you do know what "donk" means don't you?
Punch, Kick, Knock-out
Fighting deck)
So, about a month or two ago, I got my best friend into pokemon and this was the second deck he made, and if I do say so myself, it is pretty awesome. He went away 2-3 at cities, which is pretty awesome for a dude only playing for 2 months or so. This deck against that deck, I would say same outcome like KingGatr. He would get out awesome cards, but that donphan and Machamp would just knock em' down.
What the hell is "Punch, Kick, Knock-out
Fighting deck)"? Is that even a deck? A deck that your beginner friend came up with and placed 2-3 with at a CC should NOT be listed under matchups. We don't even know what's in the deck, for Christ sake.
CurseGar:
This one s a real toughy. CurseGar being an all deck and your Machamps being X2 weak makes it extremely difficult. Since I was playing my CurseGar against this deck, I could tell that they can mostly just snipe your pixies and everything for easy knock-outs. So I would say this could be a little un-favorable.
Why do you have CurseGar but not VileGar (which atm is the superior deck?) And you playtested against YOURSELF? You mean you haven't even playtested against someone else with this deck, you've just played solitaire?
I think I've said most of what I wanted to say. I'm not trying to offend the writer, but I really agree with Jason - this should definitely not be on the front page. I hope I've managed to convey the feelings I and probably a lot of others have towards the article.
Thanks,
LL