Pokémon TCG: Sword and Shield—Brilliant Stars

Iron Chef 2011 Top 16 Standings!!!

Status
Not open for further replies.
V

Vegeta ss4

Iron Chef Leader
Welcome to the Top 16
Here is the Top 16 Iron Chef bracket

Cyrus
vs.
Redwater


SceptileKing
vs.
Rainbowgym


Magnechu
vs.
KingPiplup


goldedda
vs.
Gowk


cabd
vs.
Bullados


GoldenSwablu
vs.
ericknance


Machampion12
vs.
BrightRush


waynegg
vs.
DragonClyne725

I am not sure if the challenge will be up by today, tomorrow, or Monday. Leaning on Monday to be honest guys, I am swamped. This is the Top 16 of Iron Chef 2011. Few surprises in the top 16, some not so surprising. What I do know about this next challenge, is to expect a blast from the past with a sideboard:thumb:
 
i bet u did not think i would make

i did not think i make top 16

and 95% sure im not making top 8 cause i playing the guy who made this game ....
gl anyways
 
Last edited:
redwater: I'm not the game maker; just the game codifier (a user by the name of HYPER EEVEE made it).

...And he's 100% right: I "could" slip. However, rather than letting that happen, I'll just promise the best match I can give you, and hope you do the same for me. :cool:

(BTW, you accidentally linked us to your bracket maker account, VSS4!)
 
Cyrus said:
redwater: I'm not the game maker; just the game codifier (a user by the name of HYPER EEVEE made it).

...And he's 100% right: I "could" slip. However, rather than letting that happen, I'll just promise the best match I can give you, and hope you do the same for me. :cool:

(BTW, you accidentally linked us to your bracket maker account, VSS4!)
Click to expand...

ok i was wrong but i know i have a changh not a good one but it could happen and gl cyrus let the best deck win
 
Seriously, what? I read the topic execting to be int his, and i go back to read you're terribely short winner switch. Honestly, i wasn't even expectign to move on, i expected to get swept away by bullados. But when i saw i'd won by a point, i didnt dwell on it and looked forward to the next round.

So why was there so much "special attention' put into my match when we have one of the shortest write ups? There was an additional 5 days added to the round and the only thign to show for it is "oh i feel bad bullados didnt make it so now he did". I'd like to think more went into it, but you didn't really give anythign to as why my score didnt deserve a tweak as well. Why does bullados magically gain 2 points to beat me? How is his consistancy 9/10? He has to set up 3 stage 2s. He runs only a handful of cards different to me in trainer line. WHere is this sudden new gap in our points comign from?

I feel if i'm getting jilted off a round i already one i deserve to be acknowledged. Seriously, if bullados had just won, or tied and won based off 1 higher score, I would have been fine. But I felt satisfied that i deserved the win based off our lists, and i dont see why this has become such a huge issue.
 
It isn't a huge issue to me, you are making this a huge issue. If I'm not mistaken you say you would of been fine if I changed who won. The point is, he deserved a better score, so I recalculated it to all extents. Every entry was recalculated, and only your matchup was different. His list earned a 9 because it was uber consistant. I feel the right list can setup 3 Stage 2's. He won with a better list, if you're not wanting this to be a big issue, then don't let it be a big issue.
-Nathan
Posted with Mobile style...
 
Shino: I said this on the other thread, and I'll say it here again. If he would have given me 7/4/4 and you an 8/4/4, I would have been fine with it, congratulated you, and went on my way. It's that he gave me a 8/3/4 and you and 8/4/4 when our lists are essentially the exact same idea. I didn't feel, and still don't feel, that your deck is more creative than mine. They are essentially the exact same deck, just with different Healers, and slightly different Trainer counts. Yes, 3 stage 2s can be inconsistent. But it has worked in the past. And with effective locking like Vileplume, along with sufficient Consistency Supporters, it can be effective again.

As far as the point of the competition, to try and create a tank, I'm not sure whose deck is better. Yours will perform better in the metagame as far as winning games, I absolutely concede the point there. I don't know which one would last longer as a Tank style deck. Yours is faster, but should tend to drop out of the tanking after 10-12 turns. Mine might take a little bit longer to set up, but I think it'll hold the Tank for much longer.
 
I really have to agree with Shino. While I know it wasn't simply "too bad bullados didn't win. Now he did!" it's still extremely wack and I think you award him the win he initially earned. If you slipped up and missed tha bullados's deck was better, thats your fault and he should not be punished for it.
 
^. At this point i wouldnt accept my spot back. I just hope to make it so no future rounds deal with anything of the same nature. I had looked forward to joining you, but i wish all participants good luck.
 
So Chase, what you are saying is if I make a wrong judgement, as the head judge I cannot fix my mistake by letting the person who deservd to win, win?
Interesting concept?
Posted with Mobile style...
 
Vegeta ss4 said:
So Chase, what you are saying is if I make a wrong judgement, as the head judge I cannot fix my mistake by letting the person who deservd to win, win?
Interesting concept?
Posted with Mobile style...
Click to expand...

[DEL]I find this pretty funny.[/DEL]

Good luck to everyone, wish I was still involved in this.
 
Vegeta ss4 said:
So Chase, what you are saying is if I make a wrong judgement, as the head judge I cannot fix my mistake by letting the person who deservd to win, win?
Interesting concept?
Posted with Mobile style...
Click to expand...

That's not what I'm saying at all. You should have reviewed each score and changed any before posting them or even within the first few hours of them being up, not 6 days later.

The way I see it, and clearly you feel differently, is that the posted results are the final results, as you would have had as much time as you'd like to review them beforehand, which apparently you didn't. And like I said before, Shino should not be punished for your mistake. While I'm aware bullados would suffer from the original score, losing is not nearly as bad as winning, then being told you actually lost.

Of course none of this actually matters as Shino doesn't want back in and this isn't a serious, competitive contest. So best of luck to those still in it.
 
No, posted results are NOT final results. I said that they are unofficial. I had the same thing happen to me in Iron Chef competition. I won in TOP 32 then lost rightfully.
Posted with Mobile style...
 
Vegeta, I don't think that's a perfect comparison to make. The system for that year you lost was "voter input," where I had a formally carved-out period of time to get feedback from users on my opinion. While you mention the possibility to change decisions, it is reasonable to say that in one instance (this), the winner was changed, but in the other (yours/Wooper's), the winner was never decided in the first place.

Either way, the best submission should win. Both entries looked good, though!
 
Thanks for your input Cyrus, the comparison isn't the same, but the idea of being "crushed" is the same. Point is guys, Shino didn't have as goood of an entry after further review. Bullados was the reverse of that. I think it sucks to have to eliminate anyone, especially the Gowk Darkwalker matchup. Darkwalker's deck list in terms of points was on of the best. Challenge up by tonight, hopefully players/spectators enjoy it.
Posted with Mobile style...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top