GrandmaJoner
Active Member
Ok, so I think this situation can arise at any point when a player has a Sableye and another basic in their opening hand, but in order to accentuate my point I will describe an extreme circumstance.
Suppose I am going into my swiss round match playing an opponent I know is using Kingdra or Machamp or something that has severe t1 knockout potential.
At the beginning of the game I open with a hand that includes Sableye, Baltoy, and Special Darkness Energy.
Might be an obvious choice to put Sableye first, however knowing my opponents strong t1 potential I think twice about it.
NOW, here is the problem:
If he only puts down ONE basic, I would likely want to put up Sableye to get the chance of FTKOing him and winning the game.
If he puts down TWO basics, I might reconsider and put up Baltoy to start, hope to lose the roll and go second, essentially eliminating his potential for a turn 1 KO.
WHO PUTS DOWN THE BASICS FIRST?????
I don't see how it could be fair for anyone to put down basics first in this situation. The only solution I see here (if there isn't one already) is both players writing down somewhere how many basics they are going to put down and showing it to their opponent at the same time.
This is obviously a silly and extreme solution but I don't really see what else can be done. Complications could arise if players Mulligan, etc.
Now in this I explained the most obvious situation, but there might be other times if you open with Sableye and another basic that you would like to know how many basics your opponent is opening with.
Any help would be appreciated, and if there already is a rule in place please inform me of it. Please ask me if you would like me to clarify anything. Thanks!
Suppose I am going into my swiss round match playing an opponent I know is using Kingdra or Machamp or something that has severe t1 knockout potential.
At the beginning of the game I open with a hand that includes Sableye, Baltoy, and Special Darkness Energy.
Might be an obvious choice to put Sableye first, however knowing my opponents strong t1 potential I think twice about it.
NOW, here is the problem:
If he only puts down ONE basic, I would likely want to put up Sableye to get the chance of FTKOing him and winning the game.
If he puts down TWO basics, I might reconsider and put up Baltoy to start, hope to lose the roll and go second, essentially eliminating his potential for a turn 1 KO.
WHO PUTS DOWN THE BASICS FIRST?????
I don't see how it could be fair for anyone to put down basics first in this situation. The only solution I see here (if there isn't one already) is both players writing down somewhere how many basics they are going to put down and showing it to their opponent at the same time.
This is obviously a silly and extreme solution but I don't really see what else can be done. Complications could arise if players Mulligan, etc.
Now in this I explained the most obvious situation, but there might be other times if you open with Sableye and another basic that you would like to know how many basics your opponent is opening with.
Any help would be appreciated, and if there already is a rule in place please inform me of it. Please ask me if you would like me to clarify anything. Thanks!