King Piplup
Active Member
SS7 set it up IIRC.So who set up TGDI? Was it SS7? And was I mentioned? xD
You'll have to talk to those authorized to share about your second question :lol:
SS7 set it up IIRC.So who set up TGDI? Was it SS7? And was I mentioned? xD
Well, to make it even worse to the situation of SS7's statement on me being new, I might never be able to improve. I'll still be able to play WWXVII but I might not play as well as most people would hope.
kirbyking ~ I am thrilled that you've become interested in WW.
Ikrit will be hosting the next WW game sometime after Worlds (mid-August), and will reveal more information about the game as it gets closer to when Sign-ups will occur. Whether it is here or in a new thread you will definitely see when the next game is announced. Stay tuned!
@Pikamaster: How is it that I "maybe" played horrible? I will admit to not being skilled in a game like this. I personally do like "mental warfare" games, such as chess. I take a game for what it is intended to do, and play with in the rules. I may not play the game like everyone else, nor did I choose to use tactics that go without results. I do not think the same as what is considered normal. I do not take things for face value, and I am a heavy analyzer. I did gain a great amount of information in the game, but died to soon to fully show my intentions of what it was I was aiming to do.
I also feel that no one really considered anything I said. I played 1 game prior to this. I was a wolf in that last game. I also came into that game late as a replacement. I learned a great amount of information to use to inn-act for the next game.
Second game, I was a townie. I did not want to role reveal, nor give out to much info about my own role. I needed a certain item to become a better use for the town. I was not positive as to how I should approach this without getting lynched. And yes, I also felt the "Oh, he is a noob and so just ignore anything since it does not make sense and his play is confusing"- sort of attitude.
If I had lived longer, I already knew way before hand the PMF5 was a wolf, and I was uncertain about as to Ikrit and AT.
One of my problems in the game is getting WIFOM figured out as to how my brain translates my thoughts as supporting evidence vs fallacy. Either way, I played how I played in order to achieve the goal of improving while developing skills to better understand how the game works and create my own style.
2 games I have been in, and I at least have seen two of the major sides of the game and trying to figure out great tactics and keep being supportive to the other players on what side I was on.
I do not mind criticism at all. It is a game. I do not take offence quickly. I do know that the game is designed to be a mental challenge, and that not every game should be a reflection of how the last games went.
So, how is it that I played so horrible? Is it because I played in an unconventional manner?
Second game, I was a townie. I did not want to role reveal, nor give out to much info about my own role. I needed a certain item to become a better use for the town. I was not positive as to how I should approach this without getting lynched. And yes, I also felt the "Oh, he is a noob and so just ignore anything since it does not make sense and his play is confusing"- sort of attitude.
@wolves from the last game: I don't understand what point you are trying to make by saying that you ignored vet reverence / reputation. If you guys had won, I'd think you'd have a great point: "We ignored past play and were successful in the game because of it." would be a really compelling argument - one that I'd actually buy. That doesn't seem to be the case here.
^ I think if I left the post with just that, I'd get a lot of "We lost because of power roles, not because of who we killed" - which I think is mostly true. I'm not saying that your play was correct/incorrect. I'm saying that we don't know either way. If the wolves had gone after vets, would they have been more or less successful? We don't know. Maybe I'm just missing the point.
But there's no way of knowing if your choices in the game were good or not. Yeah, you chose not to target vets, but was that the best choice? I don't see a compelling reason to think so. If you guys had won, or had even been close, it would make a good argument, but as is, I don't really see it as convincing.
Maybe (big maybe) targeting vets would have been a better play.
Vet Reference
But there's no way of knowing if your choices in the game were good or not. Yeah, you chose not to target vets, but was that the best choice? I don't see a compelling reason to think so. If you guys had won, or had even been close, it would make a good argument, but as is, I don't really see it as convincing.
Maybe (big maybe) targeting vets would have been a better play.
@wolves from the last game: I don't understand what point you are trying to make by saying that you ignored vet reverence / reputation. If you guys had won, I'd think you'd have a great point: "We ignored past play and were successful in the game because of it." would be a really compelling argument - one that I'd actually buy. That doesn't seem to be the case here.
^ I think if I left the post with just that, I'd get a lot of "We lost because of power roles, not because of who we killed" - which I think is mostly true. I'm not saying that your play was correct/incorrect. I'm saying that we don't know either way. If the wolves had gone after vets, would they have been more or less successful? We don't know. Maybe I'm just missing the point.
@Pikamaster: How is it that I "maybe" played horrible? I will admit to not being skilled in a game like this. I personally do like "mental warfare" games, such as chess. I take a game for what it is intended to do, and play with in the rules. I may not play the game like everyone else, nor did I choose to use tactics that go without results. I do not think the same as what is considered normal. I do not take things for face value, and I am a heavy analyzer. I did gain a great amount of information in the game, but died to soon to fully show my intentions of what it was I was aiming to do.
I also feel that no one really considered anything I said. I played 1 game prior to this. I was a wolf in that last game. I also came into that game late as a replacement. I learned a great amount of information to use to inn-act for the next game.
Second game, I was a townie. I did not want to role reveal, nor give out to much info about my own role. I needed a certain item to become a better use for the town. I was not positive as to how I should approach this without getting lynched. And yes, I also felt the "Oh, he is a noob and so just ignore anything since it does not make sense and his play is confusing"- sort of attitude.
If I had lived longer, I already knew way before hand the PMF5 was a wolf, and I was uncertain about as to Ikrit and AT.
One of my problems in the game is getting WIFOM figured out as to how my brain translates my thoughts as supporting evidence vs fallacy. Either way, I played how I played in order to achieve the goal of improving while developing skills to better understand how the game works and create my own style.
2 games I have been in, and I at least have seen two of the major sides of the game and trying to figure out great tactics and keep being supportive to the other players on what side I was on.
I do not mind criticism at all. It is a game. I do not take offence quickly. I do know that the game is designed to be a mental challenge, and that not every game should be a reflection of how the last games went.
So, how is it that I played so horrible? Is it because I played in an unconventional manner?