I got like, a 19? I think? (I was in like, the top percent for the Duke TIP program though) I don't even remember, because I am indeed taking it again this year. I believe I can do better, this past year was more of a practice test to see exactly what the ACT was like. I am only taking it one more time most likely, then I'm going to be taking several AP's, the SAT, PSAT etc.Smeagol said:From what I've seen in the past, most homeschooled kids are very bright. Not necessarily over-achievers, yet still very bright.
Here's another plus for being a homeschooled kid...
One doesn't necessarily have to be the smartest kid! One can get into *college without turning in a "high school transcript" (meaning they don't have to have a "4.0").
Myself, on the other hand, must get a 4.0 (with AP classes) to get into an excellent college. I don't have room to "mess up". Plus, since I am caucasian, I have many to compete with (which isn't fair, but that's life).
The point of the matter is that homeschooled kids don't have to be fully developed socially, nor academically, in order to get into college. They aren't going to have transcripts that say "doesn't work well with others", or lack of a better descriptive phrase.
Homeshooled kids don't have to be an all-A student in order to get into an excellent college, in my honest oppinion. For them, it is all about the ACT, SAT, and PSAT.
*= An Ivy League school, for example
Back to back posts merged. The following information has been added:
Good for you...what did you get? My bet is that since you took it so early, you will probably be taking it 2-4 more times, based on my knowledge.
Talk with a majority of teachers...they will tell you to hold off on taking the ACT until you have been through the appropriate classes. And, from what you've said, you haven't taken any AP classes as of yet, therefore you *most likely weren't prepared to score a 30+ on the respective test.
*= key word
Exactly. I fully agree.CleffaGirl said:I got like, a 19? I think? (I was in like, the top percent for the Duke TIP program though) I don't even remember, because I am indeed taking it again this year. I believe I can do better, this past year was more of a practice test to see exactly what the ACT was like. I am only taking it one more time most likely, then I'm going to be taking several AP's, the SAT, PSAT etc.
Of course I wasn't ready to get a 30+. I'm 13, sheesh. It's supposed to be for 17 year olds.
My point wasn't really what I got, my point was that homeschoolers DO have the opportunity to take such tests.
BROCKS TWIN said:Hard times in private school!!:lolon't make me laugh. Mommy and Daddy's (money) will take care of any problems. Hitmonchan says that the private school teachers actually care about the students, oh yeah, thats because the students parents are writing the teachers checks. I had a teacher at my public high school that taught at a private high school and said "All the kids have their parents take care of all their problems no matter what. I wonder what they are going to do when they have to sustain themselves in the real world."
TheLegendKiller said:Kempley since when did you go to Harrow i dont recollect seeing you around school??? Unless your there now,lol..... Results dont really matter,lol. Its evident as an individual as you dont show your whole schools results do you??? And its the name of the institution that carries you....... I know people that have got 5 C`s at GCSE at Harrow and gone off to Oxford or Cambridge.....
You can be rich and still a total idiot. :/Marril said:I'm surprised nobody's made this point about public schooling yet. In public schools, you get to interact with some real idiots, which prepares you for interacting with the idiots you meet out in the real world.
bass_forte said:You can be rich and still a total idiot. :/
Actually, we used several books and strategies from 3rd grade (when I started) until my senior year. Some subjects, like Spanish, my parents (since both are fluent) would divide the work between each other, and have basically their own curriculum. As for subjects they didn't feel as comferatable teaching, they would use a more typical curriculum purchased through various companies they had looked at, or I might enroll in some class. Of course, not all homeschoolers use this sort of method, I was just trying to answer your question.Moss Factor said:Carlos: does your mom teach you based on her own curriculum, or do you use a program to guide the process? The problem I can see with home schooling is that it appears that it would be difficult for a son or daughter to become significantly more educated than the parent teaching them. This is of course the case with any teacher-student relationship, however in private or public schools, the teacher is more specialized. I would be afraid that a parent could be a "jack of all trades, ace of none."
Yeah, that can be argued. I am pretty sure somone would be completely fine if the only subjects they studied from K-12 were English and math; they could simply read the Princeton Review during highschool and surely ace the ACT. However, I feel that learning many different things during those years is crucial to development, and would never actually back something like that.Moss Factor said:However, you could argue that K-12 schooling is essentially just a survey of the various subjects and that the real, specialized learning happens in postsecondary education.
Wow, I did not know that. I wasn't really claiming any of those as points for my own arguements though, I was really just showing how boring this discussion usually turns out to be if people keep repeating themselves. Thanks for the info:thumb:Spotter said:Actually, and this may come as a shock. . .
Private school teachers are typically paid LESS than public school. The draw, however, is that they are freed from the bureaucratic nonsense that has infected the public schools all the way down from the federal (*cough*unconstitutional*cough*) level. They are free to focus on what they are really interested in, which is teaching. True, the standards they are held to are higher, but on the flip side of that, they typically have more support from the (much smaller) bureaucracy associated with the private school AS WELL AS the parentage that sends their kids there. They know that if they call some kid out for behavior, the administators, and probably the parents, are going to back their call.
I went through public schools, and I think I got a pretty good education in spite of all of the roadblocks the federal (*cough*unconstitutional*cough*) and Texas government tried to put in they way of my teachers. I also know that was almost 20 years ago, and that much has changed in that time. When my son was born, we specifically moved to get into the district where my wife had taught, because she knew and trusted it. When it was time for him to go to school, however, the district had changed so much that we no longer trusted it. So off to private school it was!
Public school districts no longer have accountability to the right people - the families being served. Instead, they are beholden to the state and the federal government which, as I think I have pointed out, is beyond unconstitutional. The federal government needs to get out of the education business, and the state governments need to lighten up and return control to the local school districts so that the folks "in the trenches" can identify and address the current problems.
S.
TheLegendKiller said:Only unsociable people get bullied..........
Moss Factor said:Pack some HEAT