Under DCI/WOTC we had Rule Enforcement Levels (RELs).
http://www.mtghome.co.za/Rules/PG00_01.htm
The higher the REL the more stringent the enforcement of the rules. For example, drawing an extra card in an REL 1 event would be just a warning while doing so in an REL 3 event would cost you the game.
Under these rules I think that Pokemon was always REL 1 anyway.
Should we have RELs in Pokemon?
For example, a regular weekly tournament should be REL 1.
The City Championships REL 2.
States REL 3.
And so on?
If not, then how can we ensure consistency? I believe that the floor rules we have now leave everything up to the head judge’s discretion.
http://www.mtghome.co.za/Rules/PG00_01.htm
The higher the REL the more stringent the enforcement of the rules. For example, drawing an extra card in an REL 1 event would be just a warning while doing so in an REL 3 event would cost you the game.
Under these rules I think that Pokemon was always REL 1 anyway.
Should we have RELs in Pokemon?
For example, a regular weekly tournament should be REL 1.
The City Championships REL 2.
States REL 3.
And so on?
If not, then how can we ensure consistency? I believe that the floor rules we have now leave everything up to the head judge’s discretion.