At many tournaments this year, and especially at the recent City Championship marathons, Masters' attendance has been *much* higher than Juniors' and Seniors'. That has meant that Juniors & Seniors are typically done hours before the Masters. It also means that Juniors & Seniors have fewer opportunities (relative to Masters) to play games that count towards their ratings at these tourneys. The Juniors & Seniors I've spoken with have fun afterwards anyway, playing pickup games and trading. But it might be nice to give them the opportunity to play more games that "count".
How do you all--players and TO's--feel about this? Do TO's currently have the option of running more Swiss rounds than are needed to determine an undefeated winner? If they don't, should they? If they do, should they add rounds? Would it be unfair to other Junior and Senior players that have TO's that don't follow this practice?
How do you all--players and TO's--feel about this? Do TO's currently have the option of running more Swiss rounds than are needed to determine an undefeated winner? If they don't, should they? If they do, should they add rounds? Would it be unfair to other Junior and Senior players that have TO's that don't follow this practice?