Discussion on new Undaunted set
I posted a comment in another thread a few days ago about my disappointment with Undaunted and I felt like it was poor placement for such a comment. So, I decided I'd make a new thread in an area where the topic could be properly discussed.
My message discussed my disappointment with the mixing of promo cards with cards from other sets to produce a brand new set and how moving of cards between sets can have a negative effect on the overall integrity of the sets and on the actual game.
For all those who don't know, Unleashed is made up of cards from three japanese products: Expert Deck - Metagross vs. Leafeon, Battle Starter Decks, and 23 cards from Revived Legends. Because close to 1/4 of Revived Legends was removed in order to make Unleashed, when Undaunted came around (the set based on Revived Legends), there was a hole that had to be filled. There were only 79 cards that could be printed from Revived Legends, so to create Undaunted, 2 Legends were pulled over from the next japanese set, Clash at the Summit, and a few promos that had been given out through tournaments and promotions in japan were added to the set to finish the set at 90 cards total, which is the smallest Pokemon set since Neo Revelation which was released in October, 2001.
Undaunted is looking like a very poor set, and I think that is because almost all the good cards were pulled out of it and put in Unleashed. Those cards are:
I'd rather they just translate the cards, manufacture them, and try to stay as closely to how japan packages the products as they can. Instead of combining 2 collections together with a bunch of cards from the next set, just release those 2 collections in english and let the next set be exactly what it is in japan.
What do you think?
I posted a comment in another thread a few days ago about my disappointment with Undaunted and I felt like it was poor placement for such a comment. So, I decided I'd make a new thread in an area where the topic could be properly discussed.
My message discussed my disappointment with the mixing of promo cards with cards from other sets to produce a brand new set and how moving of cards between sets can have a negative effect on the overall integrity of the sets and on the actual game.
For all those who don't know, Unleashed is made up of cards from three japanese products: Expert Deck - Metagross vs. Leafeon, Battle Starter Decks, and 23 cards from Revived Legends. Because close to 1/4 of Revived Legends was removed in order to make Unleashed, when Undaunted came around (the set based on Revived Legends), there was a hole that had to be filled. There were only 79 cards that could be printed from Revived Legends, so to create Undaunted, 2 Legends were pulled over from the next japanese set, Clash at the Summit, and a few promos that had been given out through tournaments and promotions in japan were added to the set to finish the set at 90 cards total, which is the smallest Pokemon set since Neo Revelation which was released in October, 2001.
Undaunted is looking like a very poor set, and I think that is because almost all the good cards were pulled out of it and put in Unleashed. Those cards are:
- Kingdra Prime
- Lanturn Prime
- Tyranitar Prime
- Steelix Prime
- Entei / Raikou Legend
- Entei / Suicune Legend
- Suicune / Raikou Legend
Moving of cards from the original set to another and having to fill in the 'hole' with promos and such...I really wish TPCi would just print the japanese sets exactly how they are. No moving of cards, no breaking of sets into smaller ones. Japan releases a set, 3-6 months later, TPCi releases the same set in english.
Because Nintendo needed to come up with a 4th set to meet their yearly quota, they had to create one out of thin air by mixing a bunch of products together and in return totally gimping the next set, Undaunted.... can have negative ramifications on the game; Competitive players have a lesser urge to buy packs because they don't want most of the cards. They have less fun at Pre-Releases because even more of the cards they pull are not the 'few' they really want. The value of the set plummets, hurting both the collectors and the sellers.
I'd rather they just translate the cards, manufacture them, and try to stay as closely to how japan packages the products as they can. Instead of combining 2 collections together with a bunch of cards from the next set, just release those 2 collections in english and let the next set be exactly what it is in japan.
...the integrity of the sets and the wellness of the organized play in order to do it.Smaller sets, less sets in a year; either of these ideas would be acceptable if the sets we received were of higher quality. It's not about quantity, it's about quality, and Nintendo shouldn't strive to fit a minimum number of cards (edit: or sets) and toss away...
What do you think?
Last edited: